Just a reminder that if you took away just 2.8 million votes in California

CFM said:
Show where the rigging took place. Trump won by the rules of the game and Democrats like you can't accept that you lost.
Click to expand...

Trump got less votes, but still won. The electoral college rigs the election for the Republican.
And I'm not a Democrat. I oppose Capitalism and Globalism, which both parties advocate.
 
StoneByStone said:
That was out of the electoral college, though. He got less votes from the American people. Basically, he lost the election, but was still given the presidency because the system is rigged by the elites.
Click to expand...

Since the election is based on the electoral votes, that's all that matters.

You can't lose something when what YOU're claiming isn't what is used to determine the winner.

I don't see anything in the Constitution saying popular votes for President matter. Do you?
 
Never forget Christchurch said:
Hillary Clinton would have still won anyway. Pretty impressive right, that she could lose that much a margin in the state with the most Americans and still come out in top.

Also if you subtracted 2.8 million votes from Trump, he would have lost by 6 million instead of 3 million. Just to be fair, since we're apparently playing this weird game of subtracting Californian votes from politicians, I don't see why it should go just one way.
Click to expand...

NOW HERE THIS!

The Democrats will not even bother to legislate to end the ELECTORAL COLLEGE!

No, they won't have to, because the first time a Repubiclan loses an election because of it, they will shart their britches and legislate to end it!

Problem solved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BLAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
CFM said:
Since the election is based on the electoral votes, that's all that matters.
Click to expand...

Well it depends. If you're a Fascist, all that matters is who is in power. If you believe in democratic elections, what matters is one person = one vote.

I think you're kind of a pussy for not just admitting that you're a Fascist. I have no problem saying I'm an Ethnic Nationalist, even though it's controversial. I'm also a girl, which is probably extra embarrassing for you.
 
StoneByStone said:
Well it depends. If you're a Fascist, all that matters is who is in power. If you believe in democratic elections, what matters is one person = one vote.

I think you're kind of a pussy for not just admitting that you're a Fascist. I have no problem saying I'm an Ethnic Nationalist, even though it's controversial. I'm also a girl, which is probably extra embarrassing for you.
Click to expand...

It matters what the Constitution says. You're opposed to the rules set forth in it when you lose.

Embarrassed by an inferior? Why would you think so. You should be embarrassed to believe that supporting the Constitution means Fascism.

Why don't you get in the kitchen or pick up a dust rag and do what you were created to do.
 
CFM said:
Embarrassed by an inferior? Why would you think so. You should be embarrassed to believe that supporting the Constitution means Fascism.
Click to expand...

But an inferior has the courage to be honest about what she's about. While you're too much of a pussy to do the same. That's so sad. :(
 
StoneByStone said:
But an inferior has the courage to be honest about what she's about. While you're too much of a pussy to do the same. That's so sad. :(
Click to expand...

You don't, though, which is why you're inferior.

I stated that I support the Constitution and what it says about the electoral college. You oppose it.
 
CFM said:
You don't, though, which is why you're inferior.

I stated that I support the Constitution and what it says about the electoral college. You oppose it.
Click to expand...

You support that part because you don't believe in democracy.

And I am honest. I have no problem saying I'm an Ethnic Nationalist.
 
StoneByStone said:
You support that part because you don't believe in democracy.

And I am honest. I have no problem saying I'm an Ethnic Nationalist.
Click to expand...

I support the Constitution. You don't. It's that simple.

I support the Republic that the Constitution created. If you think it created a Democracy, you keep proving you're inferior.
 
StoneByStone said:
Nice try, but I didn't say they did that. The current electoral college system highly benefits Republicans. How we ended up with it or who started it is besides the point.
Click to expand...

What do you mean "current" electoral college system?? It has ALWAYS been the system, numb nuts...
 
StoneByStone said:
Trump got less votes,
Click to expand...
No, he didn't. He got over 300 votes. He only needed 270 to win.

StoneByStone said:
but still won.
Click to expand...
Yup. because he had more votes.

StoneByStone said:
The electoral college rigs the election for the Republican.
Click to expand...
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

StoneByStone said:
And I'm not a Democrat.
Click to expand...
I don't believe you.

StoneByStone said:
I oppose Capitalism
Click to expand...
Damn near everything you own and damn near every perk you enjoy is a direct result of Capitalism...

StoneByStone said:
and Globalism,
Click to expand...
I don't believe you.

StoneByStone said:
which both parties advocate.
Click to expand...
Support/rejection of those two things are pretty well split between party lines...
 
Never forget Christchurch said:
Hillary Clinton would have still won anyway. Pretty impressive right, that she could lose that much a margin in the state with the most Americans and still come out in top.

Also if you subtracted 2.8 million votes from Trump, he would have lost by 6 million instead of 3 million. Just to be fair, since we're apparently playing this weird game of subtracting Californian votes from politicians, I don't see why it should go just one way.
Click to expand...

This is all you need to know dumbass:

583c8f6bba6eb67d058b66d9-1136-568.png
 
Never forget Christchurch said:
Just imagine a world where 2/3 of the west coast isn't mandated to be voiceless just because it was organized as an atypically large subnational unit. If only there were a way that people could vote as individuals, then they could organize themselves into whatever size subnational government units they feel best fits their needs in their part of the country and it wouldn't mean a loss of political power, because the two would no longer be idiotically tied together because of the stupidity of the drafters of some ancient feudal treaty and their inability to perceive of a day when they're just all be equal and free citizens of one nation.

Oh well at can dream can't we.
Click to expand...

Just imagine you having a brain and education!

583c8f6bba6eb67d058b66d9-1136-568.png
 
StoneByStone said:
That was out of the electoral college, though.
Click to expand...
Yes, and that is who elects Presidents.

StoneByStone said:
He got less votes from the American people.
Click to expand...
The American people did not vote for President. The Electoral College did. The American people voted for particular Electoral College members.

StoneByStone said:
Basically, he lost the election,
Click to expand...
No, he won over 300 votes. He only needed 270 votes.

StoneByStone said:
but was still given the presidency
Click to expand...
He won the Presidency.

StoneByStone said:
because the system is rigged by the elites.
Click to expand...
Nothing is "rigged"... Stop your bitching and whining. Learn that other States DO exist besides Kaliphornia, of which I don't even consider to be a State at this point. They are effectively their own Oligarchy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top