Cancel 1 2023
Verified User
Disagreed. OTOH, if you left, there’d be one less turd in the swimming pool.
Thanks. I always know your posts will be kind and make me smile. You're a good person.
Disagreed. OTOH, if you left, there’d be one less turd in the swimming pool.
Translation: I can’t quote what doesn’t exist.
Agreed on non-existence, Jank. Thanks for the laziness confession. We’re agreed on that point.
Especially angry atheists like Jank. He’s the type to attack a Sunday school class demanding that they prove to him God exists. Same for classes at a Synagogue or Madrassa, but like most violent atheists, he mostly attacks Christians or anyone who is lenient toward Christians like Cypress and myself.I guess no one likes their sacred cows made into steaks. lol
Agreed.Hilarious, the holy rollers and the militant atheists are all over the map and cannot agree whether I am a bible thumper, or a piece of shit atheist-->
The only ones trying to turn my science thread into a thread about religion are the hardcore atheists and their holy roller pals.
Hol' up, Playa. Where's the proof of this microbe living 4 billion years ago? Post that; TIA. Until you do, that's the shaky foundation this entire rabbit hole is built on, and it's collapsing.
These are the people doing these studies:
"This “two-domain tree” was first hypothesized by evolutionary biologist Jim Lake at UCLA in 1984, but only got a foothold in the last decade, in particular due to the work of evolutionary molecular biologist Martin Embley and his lab at the University of Newcastle, UK, as well as evolutionary biologist William Martin at the Heinrich Heine University in Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bill Martin and six of his Düsseldorf colleagues (Madeline Weiss, Filipa Sousa, Natalia Mrnjavac, Sinje Neukirchen, Mayo Roettger and Shijulal Nelson-Sathi) published a 2016 paper in the journal Nature Microbiology describing this new perspective on LUCA and the two-domain tree with phylogenetics."
That kind of "Biology" is biased from the foundation up. They're not looking for facts, they're looking to prove the Theory of Evolution.
They may hypothesize, but there's no repeatable experiments that prove their assertions. In fact, stuff like this is constantly proven wrong by real life.
A blind guess is the discredited KRAKEN conspiracy theory.
LUCA is a solid scientific inference based on three decades of phylogenetic analysis.
Especially angry atheists like Jank. He’s the type to attack a Sunday school class demanding that they prove to him God exists. Same for classes at a Synagogue or Madrassa, but like most violent atheists, he mostly attacks Christians or anyone who is lenient toward Christians like Cypress and myself.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for Jank to cite a quote or provide context.
He’s pissed at me for exposing his bullshit and now he’s pissed at Cypress for not buying Jank’s bullshit.
Since astronomers have identified over 5000 exoplanets, it seems there’s plenty of heavier elements floating around.The key might be to be in a part of the galaxy that has a large variety of gas giants and super gas giants. My recollection is that certain kinds of supernovae only produce heavy elements up to iron, and others are capable of fusing heavy elements heavier than iron.
I think the Magellanic clouds are ancient and contain very few gas giants at this time
I thought you were both rather harsh, it’s why I left the conversation, and have only commented on the matter now.
Perry PhD/Jank has been pissed off at me ever since I questioned his veracity about earning a PhD based upon his personality and maturity.I thought you were both rather harsh, it’s why I left the conversation, and have only commented on the matter now.
Didn't ever claim there was ironclad proof -->
Since astronomers have identified over 5000 exoplanets, it seems there’s plenty of heavier elements floating around.
So much for the science of your "science" thread, aye?
While I slightly disagree on Netanyahu, I don’t consider you disagreeing with his politics to be antisemitic.Again, I missed most of that exchange between you, Cypress, and Novo so have no comment on that. I will point out, otoh, that I have been told that I "hate all Christians" because sometimes I point out that *some* -- particularly Xtian leaders -- are hypocrites and/or downright evil. I also think that Netanyahu is a rightwing fascist authoritarian. Does that make me an Antisemite too? lol
Most of them are gas giants though. But we're starting to find more terrestrial rocky planets.
I agree that after 13 billion years, heavy elements should be relatively ubiquitous in the universe. I would be surprised though if they are uniformly distributed in nebulae and interstellar gasses.
You said “we may not be able to communicate with life forms almost exactly like our own”. I disagree since Pi remains Pi along with the standard laws of the Universe.So you are disagreeing with "But...we may not be able to communicate with life forms almost exactly like our own.
Okay.
My understanding is that the gas giants have a rocky core. When the Sun becomes a Red Giant, Jupiter and the rest will have their gas blown off. Point being, as you stated, that heavy elements are ubiquitous in the Universe. This tells me that enough stars previously existed to fuse hydrogen into heavier elements.
A hypothesis, inference, and logical induction are part and parcel of the scientific method
Don’t hold your breath waiting for Jank to cite a quote or provide context.
He’s pissed at me for exposing his bullshit and now he’s pissed at Cypress for not buying Jank’s bullshit.
Okay, lay out the ways this hypothesis is true using logical induction.