Lets start small, evidence?

[PostmodernProphet]

Burisma.......the withholding of US aid for firing a prosecutor.......

 

[Into the Night]

Then Trump's lawyers should present that evidence in court. That is why many of his lawsuits were dismissed. You can't present a case without evidence.

What court? No court has authority to certify an election.
Democrats ARE getting charged for some of their election fraud though.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, personal crimes. There has not been one example of bribery involving China or other country and what was supposdly done for that money.

Blatant lie.

 

[domer76]

No need. Joe himself said Ukraine wasnt getting the funds they were allocated until they did what he wanted. Stfu

That’s true. Nothing about a bribe though.

Next

 

[domer76]

Sure go look it up.

I have. No bribes.

 

[domer76]

You stupid, fucking idiot. You post silliass bullshit every day, STOP

let me guess,,,the damning video must be a ":cheap fake".

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Biden-Firing-Ukraine-Prosecutor-Clip.mp4?_=2

Biden Firing Ukraine Prosecutor Clip - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Biden-Firing-Ukraine-Prosecutor-Clip.mp4

oversight.house.gov

Yep. They got the Ukraine prosecutor dumped. No bribes though.

Next

 

[Into the Night]

Quit telling others what they can or can't post.

Mindlessly repeating your question accomplishes nothing, Dimbulb. RQAA.

You keep repeating the same lies again and again

No, that's YOU. You cannot blame anyone else for your problem.

(there is no president,

There currently is no President of the United States.

there was no 2020 election,

There was no 2020 election. That election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

courts can't interpret the Constitution,

No court has authority over the Constitution. They cannot interpret it or change it in any way.

the 1st amenment does not apply to the states.

The 1st amendment does not apply to the States. It says so right in the 1st amendment.

And, your endlessly repeated lie--RQAA-

RQAA is not a lie. You are mindless repeating your questions, even though they've already been answered. This is YOUR problem. You cannot blame YOUR problem on me or anybody else.

-when you have never presented any evidence to support your lies.

Blatant lie. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

And, of course, your stupid fallacies.

They are YOUR fallacies, Dimbulb. YOU made them. You have only YOURSELF to blame. You cannot blame your problems on me or anybody else.

So, just post what you want and I'll post what I want. You don't get give me orders.

You aren't posting anything. You are just mindlessly repeating questions that have already been answered and whining.

 

[Into the Night]

Then give us an example. Who got a bribe and what did they do in return?

RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

I have. No bribes.

Blatant lie. That won't work, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep. They got the Ukraine prosecutor dumped. No bribes though.

Next

Paradox. You cannot both sides of a paradox, Sybil. It's irrational.

 

[domer76]

Burisma.......the withholding of US aid for firing a prosecutor.......

No bribe.

Next

 

[T. A. Gardner]

No bribe.

Next

Given who replaced the guy Biden wanted gone... Utterly and completely a bribe.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

No bribe.

Next

the witnesses at the congressional hearings said otherwise......

 

[domer76]

Given who replaced the guy Biden wanted gone... Utterly and completely a bribe.

Joe was there at the behest of the International Monetary Fund, European diplomats, and the Obama administration.

But, of course, you knew that, didn’t you liar, because you’ve been told that multiple times before.

 

[TOP]

Given who replaced the guy Biden wanted gone... Utterly and completely a bribe.

Absolutely...

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Joe was there at the behest of the International Monetary Fund, European diplomats, and the Obama administration.

But, of course, you knew that, didn’t you liar, because you’ve been told that multiple times before.

Doesn't matter who sent him, he offered Ukraine a bribe to remove a prosecutor that was inconvenient to the corrupt powers that be. Ukraine took the offer and replaced a reasonably competent prosecutor with one that was totally unqualified, incompetent, and corrupt, but would work with the rest of the corrupt leadership.

 

[domer76]

the witnesses at the congressional hearings said otherwise......

Who were they?

Doesn't matter who sent him, he offered Ukraine a bribe to remove a prosecutor that was inconvenient to the corrupt powers that be. Ukraine took the offer and replaced a reasonably competent prosecutor with one that was totally unqualified, incompetent, and corrupt, but would work with the rest of the corrupt leadership.

He didn’t, nor was involved, in the replacement. The old prosecutor was the incompetent one, not doing his job.

 

[christiefan915]

Given who replaced the guy Biden wanted gone... Utterly and completely a bribe.

You mean the guy Obama wanted gone.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Who were they?

He didn’t, nor was involved, in the replacement. The old prosecutor was the incompetent one, not doing his job.

Wrong. He was doing his job. The guy that replaced him couldn't do the job. Quite literally couldn't. In fact, the Ukrainian legislature had to pass a new law negating current law to allow him to serve at all.

 

[domer76]

Wrong. He was doing his job. The guy that replaced him couldn't do the job. Quite literally couldn't. In fact, the Ukrainian legislature had to pass a new law negating current law to allow him to serve at all.

You can keep telling yourself the same lie. There’s not a fucking thing anyone telling you the truth will change that. That’s the common denominator among you Trumpers