LINCOLN, the CIVIL WAR and SLAVERY

The matter of slavery is a state's right matter. Always was.
Now about "honest" Abe....
Twice violated his agreement regarding what was being sent to SC.

No, the matter of slavery was not a matter of state's rights, because that is not a real thing. Re-read the 10th Amendment, and tell me where the term "state's rights" appears.

Between Buchanan and Lincoln, talks over the fort basically amounted to the CSA demanding that America hand the fort over. Even Buchanan refused to do this. Lincoln didn't make any promises to your side for him to have broken anything. It's just your usual Confederate way of telling lies and misinformation as a means to "debate."
 
Obsession by Dutch

What, exactly, are you claiming I'm obsessing about?

While you formulate a reply, did I tell you about my time with Mason's mom? She was great. Certainly better than her weak and stupid son. She once whispered into my ear, "I like to be pampered." I nuzzled her and said, "Sorry honey, I'm not into diaper fetishes."
 
What, exactly, are you claiming I'm obsessing about?

While you formulate a reply, did I tell you about my time with Mason's mom? She was great. Certainly better than her weak and stupid son. She once whispered into my ear, "I like to be pampered." I nuzzled her and said, "Sorry honey, I'm not into diaper fetishes."

Obsessed with Trump.
 
No, the matter of slavery was not a matter of state's rights, because that is not a real thing. Re-read the 10th Amendment, and tell me where the term "state's rights" appears.

Between Buchanan and Lincoln, talks over the fort basically amounted to the CSA demanding that America hand the fort over. Even Buchanan refused to do this. Lincoln didn't make any promises to your side for him to have broken anything. It's just your usual Confederate way of telling lies and misinformation as a means to "debate."

Why would a President surrender a fort to criminals?
 
Slavery one facet of the general issue of states rights.
Not the only one.

Agreed. The specific issue the CSA states seceded over was slavery; but the general issue was for each state to have more autonomy. Before the Civil War, that was a common opinion. It was only after that the United States was thought of as one entity. As historian Shelby Foote once noted: "Before the war, it was said "the United States are." Grammatically, it was spoken that way and thought of as a collection of independent states. And after the war, it was always "the United States is," as we say to day without being self-conscious at all. And that's sums up what the war accomplished."
 
Why would a President surrender a fort to criminals?

The same reason a President kills 2% of his population. The same reasons sock puppeteers are lying scumbags.

Some time ago Mason's mom and I were resting in bed. She says "Give me twelves inches and make it hurt" so I pumped my dick into her twice and slapped her.
 
The same reason a President kills 2% of his population. The same reasons sock puppeteers are lying scumbags.

Some time ago Mason's mom and I were resting in bed. She says "Give me twelves inches and make it hurt" so I pumped my dick into her twice and slapped her.

So you're a anti-American pervert
 
Whether it was legal or not.

Please do explain, rather than just claiming he broke the law. It's refreshing to see someone rooting so hard against America. I'm glad you weren't there to defend the Axis Powers during WWII. Maybe if FDR had surrendered Pearl Harbor to Japan, things would have worked out.
 
Boston us a far more racist region.
Southern California too just different sorts.

yeah, you're just pulling that outta your ass.

Let me know when MA or CA invents the idea of in-person voter fraud and implements voter ID purely to suppress minority votes. Or when they lynch blacks on the regular, or when they deny felons' voting rights or continue marijuana prohibition (all essentially modern Jim Crow policies that disproportionately affect blacks).
 
Last edited:
Was saving the union a good idea in the long run?
Kentucky did not join the confederacy.
It stayed with the union throughout, despite sympathizing with the confederacy.

Even still, if the seceding states remained partitioned, do you think that Kentucky's Mitch McConnell could possibly be the majority leader in the US Senate?
Do you think that his colleague Rand Paul could even walk about in public safely?

An America almost completely free of Red States would be the closest thing to paradise ever existent on this earth.
 
Lncoln sent the military to Ft Sumpter, thats aggression.
The CSA did nothing to the union but leave it.

lol, you're so fucking brainwashed.

Did your textbooks actually have a stars and bars on them? The federal government was occupying the fort (because the fort was federal property) well before any articles of secession, and SC had no legal authority to order them to leave. To believe otherwise is to deny gravity. Once they started the bombing, they started the war.
 
Back
Top