Low IQ on display

guno said:
They sure do have your kinds number
Click to expand...

Actually the SPLC has been thoroughly discredited as a reliable source. You'd get better information from InfoWars, The Young Turks, or Alternet.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has lost all credibility
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ab7d60-756d-11e8-9780-b1dd6a09b549_story.html

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...aw-center-hate-groups-scam-column/2022301001/

The SPLC’s No Good, Very Bad Day
https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-splcs-no-good-very-bad-day/

The SPLC has been repeatedly sued for libel by people and groups they've smeared and lost every time. They have proven themselves an unreliable source.
 
Into the Night said:
Could very well be. This is just rash of these particular trains derailing is more than just coincidence.

I make explosives too, but I don't use them to blow up people or trains. I make them for entertainment purposes and public shows.
I know how to derail trains too. I used to be a switchman and rear brakemen on a railroad.

But I don't go around derailing trains.
Click to expand...

Not a coincidence at all. Just a question of probability and time. The tracks are all being neglected and regulations are being shredded. This is a result.
 
Nordberg said:
Not a coincidence at all. Just a question of probability and time. The tracks are all being neglected and regulations are being shredded. This is a result.
Click to expand...

Math errors: Failure to declare boundary. Failure to declare randX.
Logic errors: Compositional error fallacy. Void argument fallacy. Attempted proof by void.

No argument presented.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Actually the SPLC has been thoroughly discredited as a reliable source. You'd get better information from InfoWars, The Young Turks, or Alternet.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has lost all credibility
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ab7d60-756d-11e8-9780-b1dd6a09b549_story.html

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...aw-center-hate-groups-scam-column/2022301001/

The SPLC’s No Good, Very Bad Day
https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-splcs-no-good-very-bad-day/

The SPLC has been repeatedly sued for libel by people and groups they've smeared and lost every time. They have proven themselves an unreliable source.
Click to expand...

FYI for the reading audience:

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/capital-research-center-media-bias


https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Capital_Research_Center
 
Taichiliberal said:
FYI for the reading audience:

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/capital-research-center-media-bias

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Capital_Research_Center
Click to expand...

This is an irrelevant Appeal to Authority used as an ad hominem. That is, rather than refuting what was presented, you give us two sites whose OPINIONS are that the site you list is unreliable. That won't fly. Refute the evidence, not the source.

Worse, you imply that because one source I listed is by your standards unreliable, that all of the sources I used are. That won't fly either. If one source was wrong, but all the others are correct and supported, then you have nothing for a rebuttal.
 
The Sage of Main Street said:
The Silenced Majority

The Ohio National Guard did that at Kent State, but there were no other patriots around to follow its example.
Click to expand...

Pssst....just to let you know, McNamara in the documentary "The Fog of War" confessed that our involvement in Vietnam was based on a LIE. Is that the type of patriot you're talking about?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
FYI for the reading audience:

https://www.allsides.com/news-source...ter-media-bias

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.ph...esearch_Center
Click to expand...



This is an irrelevant Appeal to Authority used as an ad hominem. That is, rather than refuting what was presented, you give us two sites whose OPINIONS are that the site you list is unreliable. That won't fly. Refute the evidence, not the source.

Worse, you imply that because one source I listed is by your standards unreliable, that all of the sources I used are. That won't fly either. If one source was wrong, but all the others are correct and supported, then you have nothing for a rebuttal.
Click to expand...

So let me get this straight.....bias by SPLC is wrong, but bias by a wonk like Ludwig is okay?

Not my standards bunky....by review of others who have no problem listing left wing/leaning bias when appropriate. As to OPINIONS, doesn't at least two of your links show EXACTLY THAT? Hell, it's listed as such. My link All Sides is not an "opinion".

So again, your moronic crowing of hypocrisy just makes you more the MAGA mook. Carry on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
So let me get this straight.....bias by SPLC is wrong, but bias by a wonk like Ludwig is okay?

Not my standards bunky....by review of others who have no problem listing left wing/leaning bias when appropriate. As to OPINIONS, doesn't at least two of your links show EXACTLY THAT? Hell, it's listed as such. My link All Sides is not an "opinion".

So again, your moronic crowing of hypocrisy just makes you more the MAGA mook. Carry on.
Click to expand...

No, the SPLC is biased and biased to the point of lying. I put up sources that show that, and your response is to attack the sources not refute the evidence.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
So let me get this straight.....bias by SPLC is wrong, but bias by a wonk like Ludwig is okay?

Not my standards bunky....by review of others who have no problem listing left wing/leaning bias when appropriate. As to OPINIONS, doesn't at least two of your links show EXACTLY THAT? Hell, it's listed as such. My link All Sides is not an "opinion".

So again, your moronic crowing of hypocrisy just makes you more the MAGA mook. Carry on.
Click to expand...


No, the SPLC is biased and biased to the point of lying. I put up sources that show that, and your response is to attack the sources not refute the evidence.
Click to expand...

Didn't I acknowledge bias, you simp? Jeezus, come back when you're sober or had a good night's sleep. I'll catch you then.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Disagreed on prevention. There's inspection, investment in better materials, more frequent replacement, etc. The problem is that most of those things cost more money and corporations are all about profit.

In this case, who is really paying here besides the citizens of East Palestine? Aren't the railroads insured?
Click to expand...

My quote mentioned nothing about prevention. NO braking system would have prevented this accident.
 
RB 60 said:
My quote mentioned nothing about prevention. NO braking system would have prevented this accident.
Click to expand...

Prevention is how we prevent accidents. If no brakes would have prevented this accident, then the railroad is at fault for overloading the train beyond the capacity to brake.
 
guno said:
Are we under attack?' Trump Jr. loses it over train derailments

Trump Jr. has also claimed that the Biden administration is ignoring the derailments because it has impacted predominantly white communities.
Click to expand...

It isn't just the train derailments that show America is being attacked by the biden administration. While it is true that not one biden official like trans secretary buttijug showed up until about a month after the event, and biden himself has not showed up at all is because biden doesn't give a sweet f**k about the average American. While he certainly doesn't care about mostly white people for many reasons--like those living in Palestine, Ohio, he also hasn't shown up there because that community overwhelmingly voted for Trump, which would give biden another such reason to give that community the middle finger. Biden also doesn't care about the many tragedies he he himself created at our southern border that affect and or killed thousands of people (including American citizens). So Trump Jr. was right on mark with his statement.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Pssst....just to let you know, McNamara in the documentary "The Fog of War" confessed that our involvement in Vietnam was based on a LIE. Is that the type of patriot you're talking about?
Click to expand...
Well ... we're waiting for you to post that clip lest we presume you are lying.
 
christiefan915 said:
[tweet removed]
Click to expand...
Trump Jr. asked two questions:
1. Are we under attack?
2. Has anyone looked into it?

He did not suggest that we were under attack. The results of the "looking into it" would do the suggesting or not. If the answer is that we were not attacked then that is the answer. If, however, the "looking into it" reveals that we were attacked, then it's a very good thing that he asked the question.

Trump Jr. cited circumstances that should be "looked into.". He never wrote "I think we're under attack" or "I submit that we have been attacked" or anything along the lines of suggesting that we were attacked. If anything, he suggested it be "looked into."

Read it again.
 
IBDaMann said:
Trump Jr. asked two questions:
1. Are we under attack?
2. Has anyone looked into it?

He did not suggest that we were under attack. The results of the "looking into it" would do the suggesting or not. If the answer is that we were not attacked then that is the answer. If, however, the "looking into it" reveals that we were attacked, then it's a very good thing that he asked the question.

Trump Jr. cited circumstances that should be "looked into.". He never wrote "I think we're under attack" or "I submit that we have been attacked" or anything along the lines of suggesting that we were attacked. If anything, he suggested it be "looked into."

Read it again.
Click to expand...

Yes he did. The question was rhetorical. Of course, Don Jr. is a coke addled moron, but that's beside the point
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top