You should hide your face after that blunder.
ROFLMAO.. Way to prove you have no clue what a false dichotomy argument is as you disagree with my 2 examples of what they are.
Adjusting percentages doesn't stop viruses either
If something stops 99% of viruses then it does stop viruses. It just doesn't stop all the viruses. So clearly masks stop viruses.
You are arguing that if a team scores 5 touchdowns and then fail to score on the 6th attempt then they didn't score while the score board says they have 35 points.
INT/IBDa/gfm/etc isn't very bright. He's not stupid but he's certainly nuts. Look at his manifesto and faux forum: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/59/nights-numbered-mantra-list
You should hide your face after that blunder.
A mantra list is not a manifesto... It is not a faux forum; the forum exists.
It is not a faux forum; the forum is very real.Disagreed. Faux in that it's a sock puppet forum.
It is not a faux forum; the forum is very real.
That's the whole point of the OP.I do not recall arguing that masks don't work if they don't stop 100%. Too much info missing from that argument, too general.
Demonstrating only that you don't care how many people you infect and that you have no understanding of what masks do.I don't wear masks anywhere (except to keep my job and to be able to see the doctor/dentist). But out in public, inside grocery stores and etc, I do not wear one (even though King Evers has mandated mask wearing). The way the mandate is written, it is not enforceable in any practical way, and various police departments across the State have said that they will not physically respond to any calls regarding mask wearing.
Not what is being argued.
No, it just shows that seatbelts are not capable of saving all lives in all situations.
No, it just shows that not all three year olds that have ever touched a gun end up shooting themselves with it.
Masks do not stop nor prevent the spread of viruses. Viruses go right through the mask pores, you see... It is like trying to stop or prevent the spread of water by using a spaghetti strainer.
Is this the one that I stumbled into a few days ago that carries IBDaWoMann as a moderator? If so, it must be a complete joke.LOL Dude, it's virtual and filled with sock puppets.
Be honest, how many real members do you have? Three? One?
How long does a coronavirus by itself last in air?
You should start a thread about that. This thread is about an article that you do not dispute. The article that you can't dispute is about how masks don't prevent the transmission of viruses. Thank you for your default endorsement of the article.
Still with your nonsense. Of course, your entire methodology is to insist that you're right until all the intelligent people give up and move on.You should start a thread about that. This thread is about an article that you do not dispute. The article that you can't dispute is about how masks don't prevent the transmission of viruses. Thank you for your default endorsement of the article.
Is this the one that I stumbled into a few days ago that carries IBDaWoMann as a moderator? If so, it must be a complete joke.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
439 posts so far, and lefties aren't disputing the content of the article that the thread is about. Lots of dodge, deflect, invert, convert, divert, redefine, or otherwise evade, but lefties simply cannot quote anything from the article and describe how it is inaccurate. The lefty responses to this thread support the claim in the title of the article about masks not preventing spread of viruses. Thanks lefties for that endorsement.