It is based on the rule of which Dixie uses himself.
But not the one I use...!
It is based on the rule of which Dixie uses himself.
And yours is absolute to Dixie?But not the one I use...!
Also, you had a lot of ifs in there. "If I could keep it from my child." "If I could forgive her."
So far, we have little information on which to judge Dixie even by these standards. Do we know why he divorced? I don't think he has ever brought forward that information for us to use to decide his morality or not. Also, can somebody not do an immoral act then later change? So, even if they learn from their mistakes one cannot speak on a subject in which they have made a mistake?
There are simply too many unanswered questions to simply judge Dixie without regard to the answers. Plus, I have no intention of asking for the answers to most of them. I prefer to allow a person to give me their opinion on a subject and to argue the opinion rather than to attempt to judge them on morality then choose to listen or not.
Is it better for kids to grow in a family based on a bad marriage ?
I was not decrying modern life, there are many things about modern life I like. I was decrying modern liberal immorality and spiraling modern decadence and perversion in our society. This didn't include divorce, people have been getting divorced for years.
I've highligted a crucial part of what I said, I want you to read it over and over and over again, then I want you to read it over one more time, and see if you can't find some fucking inking of a suggestion, that I might just have given a caviat to my statement. I think most sane rational people can see this, and understand it fully. The example you pulled, was not me decrying anything, it was pointing out an observation I had made, and illustrated the changing time which I was discussing. I was not using that example to blame anyone for anything, or as an issue, or to make any sole determination on the ills of society whatsoever, and to continue to categorize my comments that way, is dishonest, disingenuous, and unethical... of course, you're all about that, aren't you scumbag?This didn't include divorce, people have been getting divorced for years. It's sad, and it probably has contributed to many of the other problems, but it wasn't really a part of this discussion, or what I was decrying.
I am not judging him morally. Thats his place to judge for himself, in my opinion. I was just pointing out how he was decrying modern life, including the increased divorce rate, and he himself is divorced.
I was not calling him immoral.
so...you are willing to admit that your divorce and prolonged absence from your parenting role has allowed you to contribute, in your own unique way, to many of the other problems facing America?
Why do you feel so compelled to bring my personal life into this? Do you just lack any moral decency whatsoever? Is this how you think it's best to articulate your points, by chastising someone personally, and casting judgements on them? Even a crack-smoking low-life piece of trash, has more human dignity and ethics than you... that's sad. Argue on point, and stay out of my personal life, or things are going to get ugly real fast here.
THe point is that while many conservatives are out there attacking "society" and pointing to divorce as a cause for society's ills.... they are worshiping Ronald Reagan who sunck out of the house he shared with Jane Whyneman (his ex-wife) and his son! He was just gone the next day! Shortly thereaftrer he married Nancy Reagan!