Lorca
Don't fence me in
Missing the point, STY. It wasn't coincidental that the gun group just showed up to get their pictures taken. Why would they demonstrate at a membership meeting if not to intimidate?
"The women were having a membership meeting, for a state chapter of the ironically-named Moms Demand Action for “Gun Sense” in America (MDA)... [so]an open carry advocacy group from Open Carry Texas (OCT) decided to hold a counter-rally outside of the restaurant where the "moms" were hoping to acquire new funds and membership...
...During the counter-rally, OCT members were photographed discussing their actions with patrons and bystanders with loaded rifles strapped around their shoulders. Actions that are legal in most states in the union. On at least one occasion they also posed as a group for the camera and were pictured as a group from multiple angles."
Sorry, you are not proving intimidation at all.
If they were protesting the women's meeting in that restaurant...how would demonstrating *somewhere else* have done anything?
No...because those women were a specific group opposing them. So they chose to demonstrate to THEM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>