Racists always lie to themselves; how else could they be racists? It's like the way the scumbag leadership liked to pretend they were Mediaeval aristocrats - total bullshit.
That's not debatable either. The Democrats will always act like Democrats.
Racists always lie to themselves; how else could they be racists? It's like the way the scumbag leadership liked to pretend they were Mediaeval aristocrats - total bullshit.
Throughout history the southern poor were regarded as idle and ignorant, as you know, by all the bosses, Southern and Northern. They didn't respect hard work, because 'blacks' did it. It's the same reason as that which kept classical Greek science purely theoretical: slaves use their hands!
That's not debatable either. The Democrats will always act like Democrats.
Again, it is not debatable that the minority slaveholders had no respect for labor. I should call you Don Quixote.
Well no, I meant I knew he was a lib pretending to be a "racist conservative".
and they attacked because the Union refused to honor the secession and leave territory that was no longer considered American. you are trying so hard to try to make this not about secession, but are completely failing.
Most poor whites respected hard word and had no intention of forcing someone else to do theirs. They fought for freedom, and now you believe that they wanted to usurp the freedom of others.
You just said that the CSA wanted America to abandon its own territory. That isn't secession—that is called theft!
OIC, sorry. Well, Jack aka Katrina/Skip/Jasper/Winston Smith/Hairy Harry/etc etc etc is no more a liberal than I am a NASA astronaut. He just plays the part of one for his own amusement. As you can see, he also plays the part of a racist conservative. Mostly, he just plays ppl.
Repubs and rightys are able to convince themselves of what they want to believe. That is what made trump possible.
semantics is a shitty form of debate. If that is all you wish to engage in, fuck off
Oh, is the fact of your own property belonging to you merely semantics?
without property rights - my fist and your face can occupy the same place - and I will admit a lack of property rights seems rather appealing right now
U mad, bro?
No - like Conservatives, 'Communists', 'Liberals' or whatever they will inevitably change out of all recognition under different leaderships and different intellectual pressures, as have in fact the Democrats and Republicans, depending on whether they represent the South or not.
If you know how to pronounce it. We won't go into what I'll call you! It is really a question of what the 'white' cannon-fodder thought of themselves that matters, and the answer seems to be, 'not much'.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/12/civil-war-still-divides-americans/
Next time conservatives want to pretend that the Civil War wasn't over slavery -- they better travel back in time and tell all of those southern states to stop telling everyone it was over slavery
For many saying it was "not over slavery" meant the war was not fought about whether to keep or end slavery.