no one wants to take your guns liars

This describes him very well...

small-minds-have-always-lashed-out-at-what-they-dont-understand-quote-1.jpg

It describes his ideology very well.
 
This describes him very well...

small-minds-have-always-lashed-out-at-what-they-dont-understand-quote-1.jpg

Ricky Gervais summed up what you said about common sense and having to deal with idiots like domer that don't have it and are simple minded stupid people

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful & difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid."

Those of us that aren't stupid have to deal with those that are so stupid (i.e. - domer) that they don't realize how stupid they are. He's the kind that if breathing wasn't an automatic function, he'd die from lack of oxygen because he's too lazy and too stupid to do it on his own.
 
Neither is stupidity. Homes are more dangerous with guns than without. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/160/10/929/140858 Not an NRA site, but an Oxford Univ. study.

https://www.ochd.org/News/Article/50

I don't see guns on that list. You're welcome to check reports from other years. You might see the factors listed in a different order but guns aren't there.

What makes the Oxford study you cited accurate. Is it because you agree with it? Yeah, that's it.
 
You’ve done their homework for them. They’ll deny the truth of it anyway. I’ve been down this road with them before. Watch them start to cherry-pick.

Yet neither one of you have accepted the challenge to come and try to take from me what you say I shouldn't have. Damn, boy, you've even posted pictures claiming it was me and where I lived yet still won't show.
 
Stupidity? So you're saying that millions of responsible gun owners who've never had any accidents or unlawful uses of their firearms are stupid?
Who's the stupid one here?

More people die from accidental falls than they do accidental shootings. All that despite the claims that more guns make houses more unsafe.
 
Stupidity? So you're saying that millions of responsible gun owners who've never had any accidents or unlawful uses of their firearms are stupid?
Who's the stupid one here?

You. Guns make your home less safe. Deal with it. No Abombs have been used since we did in Japan. Therefore give them to all countries. You are not familiar with logic.
 
More people die from accidental falls than they do accidental shootings. All that despite the claims that more guns make houses more unsafe.

So? That means only deal with the cause of the most deaths. Ignore the others, because they are not the biggest. It that logic in your bunker? So we only try and stop heart disease. The other causes do not matter. We should not care about them.
 
You. Guns make your home less safe. Deal with it. No Abombs have been used since we did in Japan. Therefore give them to all countries. You are not familiar with logic.

Why am I the stupid one? I've owned guns since I was 12 yrs. old and have never had an accident or used one in commission of any crime. My home is no less safe than yours.
And, what the hell does "Abombs" have to do with anything on this topic? If anyone is stupid, it is you!
 
You’ve done their homework for them. They’ll deny the truth of it anyway. I’ve been down this road with them before. Watch them start to cherry-pick.

Nobody denies the truth, but the same thing applies to drugs, alcohol, knives, poison. The question is whether people should have the freedom to possess a gun or the government should play big brother and make those decisions for us.

It is also true that people are more likely to survive home invasions and robbery attempts if they have a gun in the home (unless they come when you are not home and then they steal your guns).
 
Nobody denies the truth, but the same thing applies to drugs, alcohol, knives, poison. The question is whether people should have the freedom to possess a gun or the government should play big brother and make those decisions for us.

It is also true that people are more likely to survive home invasions and robbery attempts if they have a gun in the home (unless they come when you are not home and then they steal your guns).

Nobody denies the truth? Where have you been? Certainly not paying attention to the gun nuts on this forum.

Your second statement is not defendable. The first truth still stands.
 
Nobody denies the truth? Where have you been? Certainly not paying attention to the gun nuts on this forum.

Your second statement is not defendable. The first truth still stands.

It is not defensible that people with guns in the home are more likely to successfully defend themselves in home invasions?

What do you suggest? That government prohibit the possession of guns in the home? If not, what do you recommend?

If your point is simply that guns in the home are more likely to lead to accidents then it doesn't really matter whether that statement is true or not unless it leads to policy changes. Some will believe it, some will not--but it doesn't matter.
 
It is not defensible that people with guns in the home are more likely to successfully defend themselves in home invasions?

What do you suggest? That government prohibit the possession of guns in the home? If not, what do you recommend?

If your point is simply that guns in the home are more likely to lead to accidents then it doesn't really matter whether that statement is true or not unless it leads to policy changes. Some will believe it, some will not--but it doesn't matter.

Better do some homework about the risk of having firearms in the home.

SCOTUS has already ruled on firearms in the home.

Be very clear on this issue and on my point. I'm merely rebutting the position that the gun nuts on this forum take. That possession of guns in their home makes them safer. That's a myth.

Clear?
 
Back
Top