Irish Exit
Verified User
Hello Kacper,
It would only be hubris if I thought they would vote that way because I thought I was always right. That's not the case. I can make mistakes. I understand I am human, that humans make mistakes. Shoot. I used to engage with trolls. Yes, I can make mistakes alright. I also think that since I know and admit that, and live with it, that I have benefited from learning from my mistakes. I've gotten wiser in my years. It's OK to make a mistake if you are honest with yourself about it and you try to learn a lesson from it.
As for the implications of the 2016 election? Spot on comment in the OP.
I think that if more Americans really understood the importance of voting (and obviously they didn't,) they would have voted against Trump.
Look at it this way. Trump and his followers spent all the money they could amass to get him elected. Anybody who might have been drawn to support him already was. He has not won over many people since. But a lot of people who did not vote, do not approve of what is going on. And Trump's job approval ratings have been consistently below his support level on election day. That means he has not only not gained more followers, he has lost some of the ones he had on election day. His support is less than half the nation. That means most of the nation does not support him or what he is doing. That is why it is accurate to say if more Americans truly understood the implications of that election, and they decided to vote, they would vote against, and not for, Donald Trump.
Again with the hubris. Your priorities are not always their priorities. You might think they should have voted for Clinton because they could benefit from free healthcare. They might think that Trump was the better choice because their uncle works in a coal mine or because they are a farmer who is tired of having to deal with regulatory strangleholds over water use or because there is a wet weather spring on their property or their farm has a waterway through it.