The best that can be said about Obama winning this award under these circumstances is this, the Nobel committee is making a political statement. We didn't like the last guy. And this is not what the Nobel is for. The politicizing of the Nobel Prize does nothing but detract from the significance of the award. The committee's decision to honor Al Gore in 2007 rather than Irene Sendler was the beginning of the end to the award's meaning and relevance, today's announcement simply completes the journey. For anyone to defend the President's winning this award for any reason other than his accomplishments is asinine. But, because there are no accomplishments worthy of a Nobel under Obama's belt, you have no choice. Much like the Nobel committee, you do nothing but demean the prize and it's original intent.
According to Alfred Nobel's will, the Peace Prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."
I'm not sure that the speeches our President has given over the last nine months are worthy of the award, but I suppose that they technically qualify him to be in the running. Except for one thing: He was nominated during his first two weeks in office, no one had any way of knowing what he would be saying over the coming months!
Even President Obama says he is undeserving of the award. Sadly, however, his hubris will not allow him to do the right thing and refuse the award. That in and of itself is a gross embarrassment.
Is it a great honor to recieve the Nobel Peace Prize? It used to be. When the recipient had actually accomplished something.
Nowadays, I'm not so sure.
Anyone who believes that our President has done anything worthy of this once great honor, well, you're sadly mistaken.
In the end, all I can say is, congratulations Mr. President. Now maybe you can make a decision about your war in Afghanistan.