Obama's idea to attack Al-Quaeda within Pakistan nets Senior Al-Qaeda leader

Damocles said:
You gave a future tense plan of McCain's that supposedly is to take over another nation. I want a link to that plan. If you can't provide one, it is because you are making crap up.
Click to expand...

I'd like a link to where I said, McCain wants to "take over" another nation.
 
the war mongering Bush/McCain plan which entails going to a country that previously had no al queda members, destabalizing it and making a terror haven while bombing the $hit out of country side and destroying the infrastructure?
Click to expand...

I'm not providing a link to the thread we are already in. However the quote above is either written incorrectly or clearly denotes a current and future plan that "entails" <-current "taking over"<-future tense.

Now, if you mean Iraq, past tense would have been better. McCain's plan entails what he believes will improve security for the people in Iraq, not an invasion. Somebody else already got that idiocy done.
 
Of Course. Pakistan is our ally. They always have been and always will be. The Ministry Of Truth says so.
 
Damocles said:
I'm not providing a link to the thread we are already in. However the quote above is either written incorrectly or clearly denotes a current and future plan that "entails" <-current "taking over"<-future tense.

Now, if you mean Iraq, past tense would have been better. McCain's plan entails what he believes will improve security for the people in Iraq, not an invasion. Somebody else already got that idiocy done.
Click to expand...

hahahah!!!!!!!

So you're that desperate to defend the Bushies that you're harping on a percieved typo. well, yes I am referring to Iraq. Has a cease fire been declared? Are we not dropping bombs on Iraq going foward? We are AT THIS time still going ahead in full force with the Busn/McCain plan in Iraq. As of right now this very instant is still BAU bush style.

Wow Damo, you're apologetic stance is turning you into a whiny beyotch.

wahhhh........"past tense would have been better"........
 
Blackflag said:
Dems and Repubs blasted him for it including our local WRLtard, yet the CIA seemed to agree with Obama.

The strike killed Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior al-Qaeda commander.

President Bush said it was stupid and John McCainn dishonestly twisted Obama's words.

Obama was right.
Click to expand...



LOL
 
Damocles said:
You sure did. But you are looking in a mirror. The thread is about this, therefore I put in my $0.02. I notice all you've brought so far is nada.

In our thread earlier I promoted that this is a good idea, I even said I agreed with Obama. Therefore "insufferable" isn't really all that apt. In that previous thread I pointed out how disingenuous it was to take that idiotic song McCain sang as a policy statement when it directly was in opposition to the actual policy position he expounded directly after singing that idiocy. Then noted that McCain and all the other candidates stated they'd do this as well.
Click to expand...

My 2 cents ..

I'm one of those, if not the only one here who calls McCain a warmonger and I point out the idiocy of someone running to be the president singing a song about bombing Iran at the same time of tremendous loss of American power, influence, respect, and stature all over the world because we are viewed as a dangerous nation of warmongers .. AND at the same time we've foolishly engaged in the uber-stupidy of the war on Iraq.

If you have difficulty seeing the idiocy of that .. then that's why you're a republican and I'm not.

If you have difficulty understanding why suggesting that we may have to remain in Iraq for 100 years is about as dumb as it gets in this political environment today, then I can't help you.

Obama proves again that "experience" don't mean shit .. and guess what?

All that bullshit about "we can't speak to people we don't like and Obama is nave for suggesting it" .. that bullshit is also going to be proven to be just as stupid as the rest of the non-sensical cowboy foreign policy truly is.

The opportunities for Obama to prove that abounds everywhere .. and he can start with Cuba.

Morning in America.
 
LadyT said:
This is the last front for Bush/McCain apologists. They have to start to pick apart grammer.
Click to expand...

And a successful, surgical strike on an awowed terrorist enemy of the United States, is tantamout to invading or "bombing" the nation of pakistan.

The closet doors are open, and the bush apologists are flooding out.
 
Cypress said:
And a successful, surgical strike on an awowed terrorist enemy of the United States, is tantamout to invading or "bombing" the nation of pakistan.
The closet doors are open, and the bush apologists are flooding out.
Click to expand...


Had you used the past tense, Cypress that would have made sense but since you just used the current tense I don't get it.
 
Again, I was asking for clarity on what made a person who wants more security for, and thus a quicker exit from Iraq, a "war monger". So far I haven't gotten any.
 
Damocles said:
Again, I was asking for clarity on what made a person who wants more security for, and thus a quicker exit from Iraq, a "war monger". So far I haven't gotten any.
Click to expand...

It's simple: you remove troops from Iraq, they don't die there.

You send more troops to iraq, they continue to die there.
 
Why does McCain want to give veto power to Pakistan over Us security? And if the gates of hell are in Pakistan apparently bin Laden is pretty safe.
 
LMAO.............

Dungheap said:
Why does McCain want to give veto power to Pakistan over Us security? And if the gates of hell are in Pakistan apparently bin Laden is pretty safe.
Click to expand...


John is much smarter than y'all give him credit for...he baited Obama with the bombing of Pakistan comment...Obama is a al Qaeda sleeper.....a fraud,liar and all around sharia law kinda guy! Michelle Obama betta wake up before she is circumsized..............
:shock:
 
DigitalDave said:
LOL, but Damo, it was fairly obvious what she was talking about. Disingenious much? ;)
Click to expand...
One more time, regardless what I asked for was clarification. So far, I got a bumpersticker with something ridiculous that didn't prove "war mongering".

It's okay. I see that it was politicking.

As for my post, I did mention: Either you got tense wrong and were speaking of something else, or you think he has a new country to invade. The only one any person says he "wants" to invade is Iran because of that idiotic song.
 
Dungheap said:
Why does McCain want to give veto power to Pakistan over Us security? And if the gates of hell are in Pakistan apparently bin Laden is pretty safe.
Click to expand...
He said that we should choose our words more carefully when speaking of it, but did not disagree.

Calling somebody inexperienced because they said something that they would have been careful to outright state is not the same thing as what you attribute.
 
Damocles said:
He said that we should choose our words more carefully when speaking of it, but did not disagree.

Calling somebody inexperienced because they said something that they would have been careful to outright state is not the same thing as what you attribute.
Click to expand...


Like not singing songs about bombing Iran? That kind of choosing words more carefully?

Gotcha.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top