Blackflag
Junior Member
Like not singing songs about bombing Iran? That kind of choosing words more carefully?
Gotcha.
LOL Touche
Like not singing songs about bombing Iran? That kind of choosing words more carefully?
Gotcha.
Right. And I agree. How many times have I said that was stupid too?Like not singing songs about bombing Iran? That kind of choosing words more carefully?
Gotcha.
Right. And I agree. How many times have I said that was stupid too?
One more time, regardless what I asked for was clarification. So far, I got a bumpersticker with something ridiculous that didn't prove "war mongering".
It's okay. I see that it was politicking.
As for my post, I did mention: Either you got tense wrong and were speaking of something else, or you think he has a new country to invade. The only one any person says he "wants" to invade is Iran because of that idiotic song.
Are you going to answer the question? Apparently you cannot.Are you trying to be obtuse today? Or is it your time of the month?
Are you going to answer the question? Apparently you cannot.
No, just because people repeat what you say doesn't mean that any of what he said promotes being a "war monger".You've answered repeatedly by many posters. Just because you put your fingers to your eyes/ears and fail to acknowledge it, doesn't mean it wasn't answered. Continually escalating the Iraq war and calling for more troops definitely qualifies one as a war monger. I don't give a flying fuck if he does it under the pretense of trying to promote peace. the fact is that he's escalating the war and more of our soldiers are going to be in harms way. WAR MONGER.
Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is.
You have to show evidence that McCain wants to bomb Iran other than him singing "bomb Iran" and you have to show evidence that McCain wants to escalate fighting in Iraq other than McCain's statements that he wants to sustained surge of troops there, presumably to stand around and pick their asses.
Of course, because those are what he said. The evidence of "war mongering" seems to be lacking.Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is.
You have to show evidence that McCain wants to bomb Iran other than him singing "bomb Iran" and you have to show evidence that McCain wants to escalate fighting in Iraq other than McCain's statements that he wants to sustained surge of troops there, presumably to stand around and pick their asses.
Actually I wasn't either. It was difficult to believe the troop buildup was a runup to walking away. Apparently only Democratic Senators who were there to vote and are currently or in the past have run for President were that stupid.that's okay. Bush, and those who voted for him, told me in 2002 that Bush didn't really want war with Iraq. That he wanted a peaceful resolution.
I wasn't fooled then either.
John is much smarter than y'all give him credit for...he baited Obama with the bombing of Pakistan comment...Obama is a al Qaeda sleeper.....a fraud,liar and all around sharia law kinda guy! Michelle Obama betta wake up before she is circumsized..............
I'll tell you, it must suck to be a "Senior al-Qaeda Leader".
Those guys get killed by the boatload.
Helpful Tip: If you're in al-Qaeda and you're offered a promotion that includes "Senior" in your new job title....
REFUSE
See that was the problem. When you get promoted to "Senior al-Qaeda Leader" they put a name plate outside your cave and we can see it using Keyhole technology (did you know that when I was in the army you could get in trouble using that term?) and then we send bombs to your office. The upside is you get access to the executive washroom.
Actually, the generic "senior al Qaeda leader" isn't all that bad. However, getting promoted to "number three" is a death sentence.
No, just because people repeat what you say doesn't mean that any of what he said promotes being a "war monger".
What is especially annoying is that I don't really support the guy at all, I just want a real quote of him:
1. Actually saying he wanted to or does want to bomb Iran.
2. Saying he wanted to escalate fighting in Iraq rather than saying he wanted to increase security to speed up the too slow process that is currently being done.
So far you have given me nothing.
So I will ask again. One quote to support your ideas? Just one? Not, Cypress says so too so it must be true! But an actual quote of him wishing to kill more people in a war. Evidence that increasing troops increases deaths in Iraq will be hard to come by.
LOL. True. Too bad they didn't get Osama, again...I'll tell you, it must suck to be a "Senior al-Qaeda Leader".
Those guys get killed by the boatload.
Helpful Tip: If you're in al-Qaeda and you're offered a promotion that includes "Senior" in your new job title....
REFUSE
Once again, nobody has given me evidence. I have pointed out why your "evidence" was lacking and asked for deeper evidence. One link.I can't believe how intentionally obtuse your being. First you start picking apart grammer and now you've just ourightly refused to acknowledge evidence when presented with. Like Dungheap said "Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is."
As a republican apologist, this has to be your lowest moment yet as a