Obama's idea to attack Al-Quaeda within Pakistan nets Senior Al-Qaeda leader

One more time, regardless what I asked for was clarification. So far, I got a bumpersticker with something ridiculous that didn't prove "war mongering".

It's okay. I see that it was politicking.

As for my post, I did mention: Either you got tense wrong and were speaking of something else, or you think he has a new country to invade. The only one any person says he "wants" to invade is Iran because of that idiotic song.

Are you trying to be obtuse today? Or is it your time of the month?
 
Are you going to answer the question? Apparently you cannot.

You've answered repeatedly by many posters. Just because you put your fingers to your eyes/ears and fail to acknowledge it, doesn't mean it wasn't answered. Continually escalating the Iraq war and calling for more troops definitely qualifies one as a war monger. I don't give a flying fuck if he does it under the pretense of trying to promote peace. the fact is that he's escalating the war and more of our soldiers are going to be in harms way. WAR MONGER.
 
You've answered repeatedly by many posters. Just because you put your fingers to your eyes/ears and fail to acknowledge it, doesn't mean it wasn't answered. Continually escalating the Iraq war and calling for more troops definitely qualifies one as a war monger. I don't give a flying fuck if he does it under the pretense of trying to promote peace. the fact is that he's escalating the war and more of our soldiers are going to be in harms way. WAR MONGER.
No, just because people repeat what you say doesn't mean that any of what he said promotes being a "war monger".

What is especially annoying is that I don't really support the guy at all, I just want a real quote of him:

1. Actually saying he wanted to or does want to bomb Iran.

2. Saying he wanted to escalate fighting in Iraq rather than saying he wanted to increase security to speed up the too slow process that is currently being done.

So far you have given me nothing.

So I will ask again. One quote to support your ideas? Just one? Not, Cypress says so too so it must be true! But an actual quote of him wishing to kill more people in a war. Evidence that increasing troops increases deaths in Iraq will be hard to come by.
 
Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is.

You have to show evidence that McCain wants to bomb Iran other than him singing "bomb Iran" and you have to show evidence that McCain wants to escalate fighting in Iraq other than McCain's statements that he wants to sustained surge of troops there, presumably to stand around and pick their asses.
 
Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is.

You have to show evidence that McCain wants to bomb Iran other than him singing "bomb Iran" and you have to show evidence that McCain wants to escalate fighting in Iraq other than McCain's statements that he wants to sustained surge of troops there, presumably to stand around and pick their asses.


that's okay. Bush, and those who voted for him, told me in 2002 that Bush didn't really want war with Iraq. That he wanted a peaceful resolution.

I wasn't fooled then either.
 
Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is.

You have to show evidence that McCain wants to bomb Iran other than him singing "bomb Iran" and you have to show evidence that McCain wants to escalate fighting in Iraq other than McCain's statements that he wants to sustained surge of troops there, presumably to stand around and pick their asses.
Of course, because those are what he said. The evidence of "war mongering" seems to be lacking.

It would be difficult to take a plan to calm down a region to mean that it was a plan to increase violence. It would be difficult to take his actual remarks rather than that stupid joke and say he was planning to, or wanted to, bomb Iran.

However, were he really a warmonger there would be plenty of evidence of his plans to bomb and kill people in places elsewhere. If those are the only two things you have, you have nothing.

At least you admit that you have nothing when you take away the spin points and seek deeper for actual evidence.
 
that's okay. Bush, and those who voted for him, told me in 2002 that Bush didn't really want war with Iraq. That he wanted a peaceful resolution.

I wasn't fooled then either.
Actually I wasn't either. It was difficult to believe the troop buildup was a runup to walking away. Apparently only Democratic Senators who were there to vote and are currently or in the past have run for President were that stupid.
 
There was plenty of evidence that Bush wanted to go after Iraq. Shoot during his 2000 campaign he spoke of how he thought that the 1998 vote to push for regime change should be escalated a bit.
 
John is much smarter than y'all give him credit for...he baited Obama with the bombing of Pakistan comment...Obama is a al Qaeda sleeper.....a fraud,liar and all around sharia law kinda guy! Michelle Obama betta wake up before she is circumsized..............
:shock:

YOu are either the worst troll ever OR you are JPP's resident paint huffer!:stup2:
 
I'll tell you, it must suck to be a "Senior al-Qaeda Leader".

Those guys get killed by the boatload.

Helpful Tip: If you're in al-Qaeda and you're offered a promotion that includes "Senior" in your new job title....

REFUSE
 
I'll tell you, it must suck to be a "Senior al-Qaeda Leader".

Those guys get killed by the boatload.

Helpful Tip: If you're in al-Qaeda and you're offered a promotion that includes "Senior" in your new job title....

REFUSE

See that was the problem. When you get promoted to "Senior al-Qaeda Leader" they put a name plate outside your cave and we can see it using Keyhole technology (did you know that when I was in the army you could get in trouble using that term?) and then we send bombs to your office. The upside is you get access to the executive washroom.
 
See that was the problem. When you get promoted to "Senior al-Qaeda Leader" they put a name plate outside your cave and we can see it using Keyhole technology (did you know that when I was in the army you could get in trouble using that term?) and then we send bombs to your office. The upside is you get access to the executive washroom.


Actually, the generic "senior al Qaeda leader" isn't all that bad. However, getting promoted to "number three" is a death sentence.
 
No, just because people repeat what you say doesn't mean that any of what he said promotes being a "war monger".

What is especially annoying is that I don't really support the guy at all, I just want a real quote of him:

1. Actually saying he wanted to or does want to bomb Iran.

2. Saying he wanted to escalate fighting in Iraq rather than saying he wanted to increase security to speed up the too slow process that is currently being done.

So far you have given me nothing.

So I will ask again. One quote to support your ideas? Just one? Not, Cypress says so too so it must be true! But an actual quote of him wishing to kill more people in a war. Evidence that increasing troops increases deaths in Iraq will be hard to come by.

I can't believe how intentionally obtuse your being. First you start picking apart grammer and now you've just ourightly refused to acknowledge evidence when presented with. Like Dungheap said "Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is."

As a republican apologist, this has to be your lowest moment yet as a
 
I'll tell you, it must suck to be a "Senior al-Qaeda Leader".

Those guys get killed by the boatload.

Helpful Tip: If you're in al-Qaeda and you're offered a promotion that includes "Senior" in your new job title....

REFUSE
LOL. True. Too bad they didn't get Osama, again...
 
I can't believe how intentionally obtuse your being. First you start picking apart grammer and now you've just ourightly refused to acknowledge evidence when presented with. Like Dungheap said "Basically Damocles has decided to define things such that you cannot meet his definitions, which is fine, so long as he realizes what a stupid game it is."

As a republican apologist, this has to be your lowest moment yet as a
Once again, nobody has given me evidence. I have pointed out why your "evidence" was lacking and asked for deeper evidence. One link.

So far you have produced nothing. Zero, a big zilch. Your "evidence" is "Cypress said it too!" That is totally zero, a nada, a big zippo.

I have repeatedly asked for evidence that actually showed him being the "war monger" you pretend to believe he is and all you can give me is a stupid joke and a plan to increase security in an already occupied land.

If anything, you have done much to assuage my worry about him rather than to convince me of war mongering. The funniest part was when you repeated the "many people have said it on this thread". But none have produced one quote to back it up. Not one link.
 
Back
Top