Yeah the earth is 3/4 water but well over 98% of that is poison to plants and animals.
By whom? C'mon, so far you're leaving all the work on the shoulders and inspiration of other people! If you don't understand what is required to do this, why are you so adamant that it's easy or even possible on the scale that would be required?
The real point is that in order to survive at any standard that we would deem acceptable, (or at all) we need the biological diversity that we have. That diversity requires that a balance be maintained, and too much stress or consumption of one resource at the expense of another will disrupt that balance and have far-reaching consequences. That means that we simply cannot afford for the human population to continue growing at its present rate. Education and increasing the standard of living worldwide are related ways to encourage the growth reduction rate voluntarily.
The fact that we're overdue for a major meteor strike, might just take care of this problem.
The problem of humanity? When did humans become a problem?
Thorn's idiotic talk about balance and diversity is just not compelling.
We've become to complacent, we rely on to many others, to many don't know what to do when they lose their jobs.
Just think what the majority would do, if they had to rely on themselves or a small grouip.
I don't believe that humans were meant to be herd minded.
WTF does that have to do with overpopulation?
I think it tends to have people to have larger families; because they feel that they've got enough safety nets to help them, no matter what.
This is what our best minds do with their time.
This reveals the true agenda of the elites.
That's not the emphasis. The emphasis is on reducing human biomass with an array of anti-human brainwash regimes, and a real reduction in access to resources.
check this out
You still don't get it. We need fossil fuels to plant, grow, harvest, transport, store and distribute that food. People power is not the limiting resource, neither is land. Fossil fuels and their availability are the limiting factor here.We have people power. People can grow food themselves. The centralization/specialization of food prodution is perhaps not the best idea.
Exactly!Much of FL has been overpopulated for years.
The proof is in the water restrictions that have been in place for more than 10 years in many places.
Are you beginning to see why we insist that Asshat eat pudding with a plastic spoon?OK, you know that nobody is talking about murdering anybody. I haven't seen anything by anyone about "culling the herd" so to speak. The emphasis is on voluntarily keeping family size down, and that's perfectly easy and simple to do.
Are you beginning to see why we insist that Asshat eat pudding with a plastic spoon?
Of course, because ad hominem attacks are all you have against my intellectual onslaught.
O-o-oka-a-ay ...
You still don't get it. We need fossil fuels to plant, grow, harvest, transport, store and distribute that food. People power is not the limiting resource, neither is land. Fossil fuels and their availability are the limiting factor here.