Physical materialism

Although I agree with Scientism...it's mainly a matter of having the instruments of measurement, I disagree with both Materialism and Physicalism since it limits us to the Natural Universe.
do you agree with making the scientists the leaders of society, ignoring morality and spirituality?

what do mean by natural universe?

sounds vague and dumb?

'you cannot go against nature, because when you do, that's part of nature too' -- Love and Rockets.
 
I think scientism, defined as empirical investigation, limits us to mechanistic knowledge of natural processes involving matter and energy. It's still one of our most powerful systems of knowledge.

OTOH, we couldn't use scientism to establish geometric truths, or knowledge of abstract properties like liberty, natural rights, equality, etc.
empirical investigation is regular science, not scientism.

scientism means making scientists the leader of everything.

:truestory:
 
To me, it's self-evident that there is an immaterial reality that transcends the human brain. The mathematical laws of the universe and the laws of logic were discovered by humans because, uniquely among animals, out minds have the ability of abstract thought and the potential to transcend itself and transcend the plane of physical matter.
that's just called abstract thinking.

you're continuing to have no point.
 
that's just called abstract thinking!
Right, because Planck's constant, the uncertainty principle, and pi never existed until humans 'thought' them up, LOL
you're continuing to have no point.
It speaks volumes that posters of the quality of Freddy Figbottom, Into The Nightgown, and Gmark/Perry PhD are constantly hollering about how wrong I supposedly am.
🤣
 
It speaks volumes that posters of the quality of Freddy Figbottom, Into The Nightgown, and Gmark/Perry PhD are constantly hollering about how wrong I supposedly am.
🤣
When all the crazies line up against you, then you must be doing something right. :)
 
Right, because Planck's constant, the uncertainty principle, and pi never existed until humans thought them up, LOL

they did exist, in that the relationship they describe existed. we just didn't know it yet.

that doesn't prove god.
It speaks volumes that posters of the quality of Freddy Figbottom, Into The Nightgown, and Gmark/Perry PhD are constantly hollering about how wrong I supposedly am.
🤣
you're a fucking idiot who misses the whole point of religious teachings.
 
To me, it's self-evident that there is an immaterial reality that transcends the human brain.

You are free to. The big question is: why can't you allow anyone to be atheist? Why do you think we have to give a flying fuck about what you "think" if you don't allow others to have a differing view without losing your shit and insulting all the time?

Hey everybody! Look at what Cypress thinks! It's the bestest thinking in the world! Applaud him!
 
"Reaction score"? I couldn't care less about my "ratings". God you are SO MUCH like Trump it's not even funny:

1. You are inherently dishonest
2. You are obsessed with "ratings"
3. Every accusation is a confession.
You're reaction score is a remarkably low 314.

That means most posters don't read your posts, or don't put much stock in them.
 
why can't you allow anyone to be atheist?!! :cuss:
I don't care if you're an atheist. But you should be able to defend your belief system, as much as Bible thumpers should have to defend theirs.

Your get extremely sensitive whenever questions are asked about the atheist worldview. Is there a part of your intuition telling you it's difficult to defend?
 
"Reaction score"? I couldn't care less about my "ratings".
Clearly another bald-faced lie coming from Perry PhD, one of JPP's biggest liars. LOL

Sooo, Perry, care to make a wager that you never, ever complained about negative reaction scores? That you are not lying about being Perry Phd?

a5at0u.jpg
 
Clearly another bald-faced lie coming from Perry PhD, one of JPP's biggest liars. LOL

Sooo, Perry, care to make a wager that you never, ever complained about negative reaction scores? That you are not lying about being Perry Phd?

a5at0u.jpg
Oh yeah, I forgot Daylight was one of his many sock puppets!

There's a few posters here with negative reaction scores, but Perry PhD's reaction score is so low, he's basically swirling the bottom of the toilet bowl with them
 
Oh yeah, I forgot Daylight was one of his many sock puppets!

There's a few posters here with negative reaction scores, but Perry PhD's reaction score is so low, he's basically swirling the bottom of the toilet bowl with them
Daylight was a name change from Perry Penis-lover, to Kafka and a few others. Gmark is a sock.
 
So now you're back tracking and agreeing with me that there are immaterial properties of the universe that exist independent of matter and energy, and independent of the human brain, since they predate humans.
no.

math is an asbract system we developed to describe and predict phenomenon we have observed regarding matter and energy.

tardo says, " I can count, therefore I proved god".

:tardthoughts:
 
Yes

Makes sense. All the atheist intellectuals subscribed to some form of materialism; Marx, Sigmund Freud, Vladimir Lenin, Jean Paul Sartre, Richard Dawkins.
 
Back
Top