Planned Parenthood 1952: Abortion 'kills the life of a baby'

Cadillac Man said:
You really think kids aren't being adopted because the waiting lists are TOO LONG?
Click to expand...

??????.....no you idiot......I said that the only kids who aren't being adopted are those who haven't been released for adoption.......you know, the ones who've been taken way from their parents for a variety of reasons including neglect and abuse, who's parents say they WANT them......
 
Of course abortion is murder. Only a sick fuck would claim it isn't. There is only one person who is not pro life whose position I at least respect for its honesty and consistency and that is Grind. While he is staunchly pro abortion he doesn't try to insult people's intelligence by pretending it isn't murder. He readily admits that it is. While I think his is a horrible position it is at least honest.
 
Granule said:
lol at your lol. Are you trying to say that WND is wrong about 1952 Planned Parenthood?

Answers:

1. I'd rather keep it illegal and let the woman's shitty judgment hang over her head. Unlike you, I'm not into enabling wrong behaviors.

2. Tired question: I'd ask the doctor to do everything he could to save both lives. That way I'm not left with a decision that you murderers seem to make so easily.

3. Calculate how many married couples there are in this country and we'll happily take our fair share.

Next question...
Click to expand...

It's always the woman's shitty judgment for people like you, granuloma. Why didn't the man have the good judgment to wear a condom?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
??????.....no you idiot......I said that the only kids who aren't being adopted are those who haven't been released for adoption.......you know, the ones who've been taken way from their parents for a variety of reasons including neglect and abuse, who's parents say they WANT them......
Click to expand...

Many people want to adopt infants only.
 
Explain this, granuloma.

DENVER -- A study is exploring evidence suggesting more men are practicing a dangerous sex trend called stealthing. The disturbing practice increases the risk of pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases...

The Columbia Journal of Gender and Law has found online groups of men encouraging other men to take off condoms during sex.

“I think it’s very common," said Amy Pohl of the Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence. "It’s much more common than people would think.”

While the trend might be picking up in popularity, it is something Pohl's organization has seen for years, called reproductive coercion.

http://kdvr.com/2017/04/26/stealthing-trend-men-encourage-men-to-take-off-condoms-during-sex/
 
christiefan915 said:
It's always the woman's shitty judgment for people like you, granuloma. Why didn't the man have the good judgment to wear a condom?
Click to expand...

Why didn't the woman have the good judgement to make him or not fuck him.

Simple really

I guess this is how it goes down in KKKhristiefans world

Woman: I want to fuck you. Wear a condom

Man: I don't want to

Woman: I want you to. I don't want to get pregnant

Man: I don't like wearing them

Woman: but I want you to wear one

Man: nope

Woman: well if you refuse to wear a condom I will fuck you anyway

Make abortion illegal tomorrow and the last statement would be this

Woman: well I ain't fuckin ya without a condom

KKKhristiefan doesn't realize how weak and whorish she makes women seem when she throws out the "well what about the guy wearing a condom". The dumb twat thinks she is shifting blame to the guy but what she is doing is showing that the woman is such a whore she will let a guy fuck her without a condom even though the woman has more at stake.
 
christiefan915 said:
It's always the woman's shitty judgment for people like you, granuloma. Why didn't the man have the good judgment to wear a condom?
Click to expand...

You'd have to ask the woman that spread her legs for him. Why didn't the woman have the good judgment to keep her legs closed unless the man put one on?
 
I Love America said:
Why didn't the woman have the good judgement to make him or not fuck him.

Simple really

I guess this is how it goes down in KKKhristiefans world

Woman: I want to fuck you. Wear a condom

Man: I don't want to

Woman: I want you to. I don't want to get pregnant

Man: I don't like wearing them

Woman: but I want you to wear one

Man: nope

Woman: well if you refuse to wear a condom I will fuck you anyway

Make abortion illegal tomorrow and the last statement would be this

Woman: well I ain't fuckin ya without a condom

KKKhristiefan doesn't realize how weak and whorish she makes women seem when she throws out the "well what about the guy wearing a condom". The dumb twat thinks she is shifting blame to the guy but what she is doing is showing that the woman is such a whore she will let a guy fuck her without a condom even though the woman has more at stake.
Click to expand...

Your "reasoning" is incredibly stupid and if true, does not paint any man in a good light. Any man who doesn't have enough respect for the woman or himself to use protection shouldn't be having sex.

I hold women responsible for using birth control too. But your example of what happens is ridiculous.
 
christiefan915 said:
Your "reasoning" is incredibly stupid and if true, does not paint any man in a good light. Any man who doesn't have enough respect for the woman or himself to use protection shouldn't be having sex.

I hold women responsible for using birth control too. But your example of what happens is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Any woman willing to spread her legs before assuring the man is using protection isn't putting herself in a good light nor does she have respect for herself. Unless it's rape on his part, the only way he can do what he does is if the woman WILLINGLY spreads her legs.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
??????.....no you idiot......I said that the only kids who aren't being adopted are those who haven't been released for adoption.......you know, the ones who've been taken way from their parents for a variety of reasons including neglect and abuse, who's parents say they WANT them......
Click to expand...

No. You said..

the waiting list is long, if an infant can be adopted they will be........

Next question. Why haven't those kids "been released for adoption"?

Added: If you want to discuss this issue like an adult, lay off the childish insults.
 
christiefan915 said:
It's always the woman's shitty judgment for people like you, granuloma. Why didn't the man have the good judgment to wear a condom?
Click to expand...
Oh shit! You got me, communist #915!

Look, stupid. I'm fully aware of the male component in this pro-abortion bullshit, so by all means! Let's hang this on the impregnator's head too! Nothing would please me more than to hold two shitbags accountable for one abortion. Hell, let's throw in the abortion clinic, while we're at it! ;)
 
christiefan915 said:
Explain this, granuloma.

DENVER -- A study is exploring evidence suggesting more men are practicing a dangerous sex trend called stealthing. The disturbing practice increases the risk of pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases...

The Columbia Journal of Gender and Law has found online groups of men encouraging other men to take off condoms during sex.

“I think it’s very common," said Amy Pohl of the Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence. "It’s much more common than people would think.”

While the trend might be picking up in popularity, it is something Pohl's organization has seen for years, called reproductive coercion.

http://kdvr.com/2017/04/26/stealthing-trend-men-encourage-men-to-take-off-condoms-during-sex/
Click to expand...
Yeah, burn the "stealthers" asses to the ground. I'm totally down for that.

But that still doesn't absolve the female, as she clearly made stupid decisions to get into that kind of predicament in the first place.

Fry them together if an abortion is the result.
 
Cadillac Man said:
No. You said..

the waiting list is long, if an infant can be adopted they will be........

Next question. Why haven't those kids "been released for adoption"?
Click to expand...

what I said was correct.....they haven't been released for adoption because they have been taken away from their children by Child Services for neglect or abuse.........but because the parents have not released rights, because they "want" their child, the courts have to decide if rights should be severed......that takes years......I know a couple from Illinois that were foster parents......they were finally able to adopt a child born to a heroin addict that the courts kept giving back to the mother every couple of years, then taking away again.....the last time when she was 8, mom tried to sell her to her dealer for sex in exchange for a fix.....that's when the state finally decided to sever rights.......my friends adopted her and now she's a nurse in Chicago with kids of her own.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
what I said was correct.....they haven't been released for adoption because they have been taken away from their children by Child Services for neglect or abuse.........but because the parents have not released rights, because they "want" their child, the courts have to decide if rights should be severed......that takes years......I know a couple from Illinois that were foster parents......they were finally able to adopt a child born to a heroin addict that the courts kept giving back to the mother every couple of years, then taking away again.....the last time when she was 8, mom tried to sell her to her dealer for sex in exchange for a fix.....that's when the state finally decided to sever rights.......my friends adopted her and now she's a nurse in Chicago with kids of her own.......
Click to expand...

That's one example. How about the hundreds of thousands of others?

This should be simple even for you.
 
It's only became even more obvious with the advancements in technology. We now have 4D ultrasounds which can show the baby in amazing detail. There's no way anyone can rationally justify it's not a human life.
 
Cadillac Man said:
That's one example. How about the hundreds of thousands of others?

This should be simple even for you.
Click to expand...

????.....I have to give you hundreds of thousands of examples?.......I think it must be you who is simple......how many people do you know who have adopted children........I know quite a few......I go to a church of about 150 families......over ten percent of them have adopted children, one couple has six.......do you know more people who have killed their children or who have adopted them.........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top