Planned Parenthood 1952: Abortion 'kills the life of a baby'

{O said:
you sound like a little bitch that presumably has left your balls in another women's purse. You absolutely have a right to tell her what to do. We live in this thing called a democracy, in which we collectively vote on and make decisions. If a woman can vote to take my money away, I can vote to control when she is allowed to kill her baby. That is how society functions. Furthermore, planned parenthood is in part funded by taxpayers ... which again.. it's your money, and thus you absolutely have a right to say where it goes. If women don't like it, they can get the money for their abortion somewhere else
Click to expand...

I've read some lame analogies but this takes the cake. You have zero right to tell a woman what to do with her own body. Women may vote on taxes but they aren't pulling those taxes out of your nether regions. The day you can tell women they can't have an abortion is the day women can tell you that you must have a vasectomy.
 
evince said:
you are alive because of a cunt
heres how its made fair
you have no rights to decide what a woman does with her womb
Your rights include using or not using your injection mechanism
Click to expand...

IHA is posting a fantasy from his favorite porn movie and pretending it's how real women think.

I bet they both got someone other than a wife pregnant and were on the hook for child support, so now they're bitter.

These two are exactly like radical conservative mullahs, with their views of women's sexuality.
 
christiefan915 said:
I've read some lame analogies but this takes the cake. You have zero right to tell a woman what to do with her own body. Women may vote on taxes but they aren't pulling those taxes out of your nether regions. The day you can tell women they can't have an abortion is the day women can tell you that you must have a vasectomy.
Click to expand...

ok....listen...you need to come back to reality. You can't just say "you have no right" and hope that makes it a reality. The bottom line is, yes, I do have a right, and I have the full capacity to vote about how to legislate your womb. For example, partial birth abortions are typically illegal. This was determined by congress and the voters. Your womb comes under my jurisdiction.

And yes, you voting to take my money is the exact same thing.
 
christiefan915 said:
IHA is posting a fantasy from his favorite porn movie and pretending it's how real women think.

I bet they both got someone other than a wife pregnant and were on the hook for child support, so now they're bitter.

These two are exactly like radical conservative mullahs, with their views of women's sexuality.
Click to expand...

You just admitted that women can't control their sexuality. If a guy refuses to use a condom you will have sex with anyway. Given that level of irresponsibility you aren't capable of making that decision.

I don't want a DUI or kill someone, so I don't drink and drive

If you are a woman and do not want to get pregnant what is the most effective way to accomplish that goal?

I know you won't have the ovaries to answer because your entire world would come crashing down.

The bottom line is you want the freedom to be as sexually irresponsible as men. Just admit it. Everything else you say is deflection.

The other funny thing is that Grind is pro abortion but unlike you isn't a coward and doesn't hide behind euphemisms and platitudes.

And yes, some decisions are zero sum games. Sorry if you don't like reality precious.
 
{O said:
ok....listen...you need to come back to reality. You can't just say "you have no right" and hope that makes it a reality. The bottom line is, yes, I do have a right, and I have the full capacity to vote about how to legislate your womb. For example, partial birth abortions are typically illegal. This was determined by congress and the voters. Your womb comes under my jurisdiction.

And yes, you voting to take my money is the exact same thing.
Click to expand...

Listen carefully. Your body is not directly affected by taxes. A woman's body is directly affected by pregnancy. Are we clear now?
 
christiefan915 said:
Listen carefully. Your body is not directly affected by taxes. A woman's body is directly affected by pregnancy. Are we clear now?
Click to expand...


Listen carefully. If the bitch makes a choice with her body she can't afford, let her do without. It's not anyone else's responsibility to offset the cost of a personal choice of another person for which they were told to butt out. Are we clear now?
 
I Love America said:
You just admitted that women can't control their sexuality. If a guy refuses to use a condom you will have sex with anyway. Given that level of irresponsibility you aren't capable of making that decision.

I don't want a DUI or kill someone, so I don't drink and drive

If you are a woman and do not want to get pregnant what is the most effective way to accomplish that goal?

I know you won't have the ovaries to answer because your entire world would come crashing down.

The bottom line is you want the freedom to be as sexually irresponsible as men. Just admit it. Everything else you say is deflection.

The other funny thing is that Grind is pro abortion but unlike you isn't a coward and doesn't hide behind euphemisms and platitudes.

And yes, some decisions are zero sum games. Sorry if you don't like reality precious.
Click to expand...

You are the one who created the scenario that a woman is powerless to say no when she see's a man's junk, not me. You are the one who said a woman would demand to have sex anyway even if a man refused to use a condom, not me. You think I can't see that you're trying to put your words in my mouth, but you're wrong.

I already posted earlier in this thread that I hold a woman just as responsible as a man regarding birth control. You, on the other hand, hold the woman more responsible. You are no different from religious fundamentalists who view women's sexuality as a threat.

Grind's no more pro-abortion than you are. He's just as much a misogynist also.
 
christiefan915 said:
You are the one who created the scenario that a woman is powerless to say no when she see's a man's junk, not me. You are the one who said a woman would demand to have sex anyway even if a man refused to use a condom, not me. You think I can't see that you're trying to put your words in my mouth, but you're wrong.

I already posted earlier in this thread that I hold a woman just as responsible as a man regarding birth control. You, on the other hand, hold the woman more responsible. You are no different from religious fundamentalists who view women's sexuality as a threat.

Grind's no more pro-abortion than you are. He's just as much a misogynist also.
Click to expand...

I doubt it's word that people are putting into your mouth.
 
christiefan915 said:
You are the one who created the scenario that a woman is powerless to say no when she see's a man's junk, not me. You are the one who said a woman would demand to have sex anyway even if a man refused to use a condom, not me. You think I can't see that you're trying to put your words in my mouth, but you're wrong.

I already posted earlier in this thread that I hold a woman just as responsible as a man regarding birth control. You, on the other hand, hold the woman more responsible. You are no different from religious fundamentalists who view women's sexuality as a threat.

Grind's no more pro-abortion than you are. He's just as much a misogynist also.
Click to expand...

You fucking illiterate twat. You didn't even understand what I wrote.

Let me make it really simple for you. Just answer this question.

Man and woman get ready to jump in the sack. She isn't on the pill and he refuses to wear a condom but wants to have sex anyway. Should the woman

A) say thanks but no thanks
B) have sex anyway and hope for the best

Two choices. You get to pick only one. Simple question. No tricks. If you refuse to answer we go back to old times.
 
I Love America said:
You fucking illiterate twat. You didn't even understand what I wrote.

Let me make it really simple for you. Just answer this question.

Man and woman get ready to jump in the sack. She isn't on the pill and he refuses to wear a condom but wants to have sex anyway. Should the woman

A) say thanks but no thanks
B) have sex anyway and hope for the best

Two choices. You get to pick only one. Simple question. No tricks. If you refuse to answer we go back to old times.
Click to expand...

While both are equally responsible for the results, what christie doesn't seem to get is the woman holds the power, so to speak, in that situation.
 
CFM said:
While both are equally responsible for the results, what christie doesn't seem to get is the woman holds the power, so to speak, in that situation.
Click to expand...

That is what is crazy. My scenario actually is pro woman and makes her the ultimate power broker. The woman ultimately decides.

But I suspect KKKhristiefan is afraid to have that much responsibility? Or she wants freedom from responsibility?
 
I Love America said:
That is what is crazy. My scenario actually is pro woman and makes her the ultimate power broker. The woman ultimately decides.

But I suspect KKKhristiefan is afraid to have that much responsibility? Or she wants freedom from responsibility?
Click to expand...

She's the typical Liberal. Wants to make the choice then expect someone else to take the responsibility when the results of the choice go south.

It's how lefties are on many things. They want the woman to have the choice of what she does with her body but when she can't afford the results, she believe those of us told to butt out of the choice should be responsible for it.
 
christiefan915 said:
The rationalization... it's painful.
Click to expand...
No, not really. Because there is no rationalization.

But what IS painful is watching a lying whore like you try and connect Conservatives with some of the biggest shitbags in the world.

No, princess, I'm not into raping women and sentencing them to the nearest misogynist.

YOU, on the other hand, care about one thing, and one thing only. The destruction of Christian Conservatives. Everything else is just a means to help you make your point.

It's why the only time you bring up something like these "stealthers" is when you're arguing in a thread like this.
 
Maybe my analogy was too difficult for KKKhristiefan to comprehend. So let me try it this way

Dear KKKhristiefan,

Do you think it is wise for a woman to have unprotected sex?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top