Pre-emptive gun law argument.

Actually, the M-1 Garands I bought from the Army are registered, but I have only one handgun I bought from a dealer back in the late 70's. I doubt those records still exist.

We don't have to register rifles in Massachusetts, which is considered a tough gun law state.
To me, that makes sense for deer rifles and target rifles, but not for AR-15s.

I have a concealed carry permit, which we do require, and which I do renew, but even with it, I don't "walk around heavy."
It spoils the line of my suits, for one thing,
and for another, where am I going to go at my age where I might need it?

My daughter is a BPD lieutenant detective, and I don't even know when she's heavy or not.
Really not that much gunplay in Boston.

Even my grandfather didn't carry when he was my age.
 
What would be amusing if it weren't so pathetic is how MAGA mooks with delusions of intelligence love to treat their mental myopia as the WHOLE truth.

Read the following carefully and comprehensively:


PolitiFact Sheet: 3 things to know about the 'gun show loophole'


https://www.politifact.com/article/2...gun-show-loop/

You give new meaning to smarmy dumbass. You're making an argument that is false and then attack others trying to educate you as MAGA mooks? Dumb.
 
Licensed firearms dealers should be the only people selling firearms.

Really? Why? As a free citizen, why can't I sell my weapon to another private citizen without government interference? Is there some data I am unaware of that suggests criminals buy their gins from private citizens? LINK?

Once a regular citizen purchases one, it should remain his/her property until it passes on to his/her heirs.

What the fuck is a "regular" citizen? Are there irregular citizens? Dumb.

I believe in the private ownership of firearms, but not in the private sale of firearms.

You cannot believe in private ownership then claim one cannot sell their weapon to another private owner.

Buy one and you must keep it until you die.

Another inane statement. You seem to be quite full of them. :palm:

That's what I've done with mine which I have not fired in decades.

Typical Fascist argument, I do it, so must you. Dumb.

People who are hellbent on divesting themselves of their firearms can always surrender them to the police, but they won't be compensated.

Another asinine statement. Yep, sorry bud, but if you don't want to own that $2,000 AR15, you'll just have to suck it up and hand it over. Dumb.

You give new meaning for DUMB with every post.
 
You misread the 2nd amendment because you want a gun. You can not win through discussions.

2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States said:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Section 24 of the Constitution of the State of Washington said:
The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

The right of the people (not the militia) to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
The right of the States to organize a militia to defend themselves shall not be infringed.
 
For YEARS I've proposed that gun sales should be treated as automobile sales with licensing and registration. That way, you can individually sell your weapon so long as you have a proper transference of papers regarding ownership that the State & Federal gov't can recognize.

Do you honestly believe that criminals will care about such a law? That they'll suddenly say, "well darn it, they want me to register it so I'll just have to pass!" How naive and dumb does one have to be to have such beliefs?

For some reason, this proposal drives "gunners" absolutely nuts

That's because people with brains know that it's an absurd and asinine proposal that will do NOTHING to stop gun crimes. Do you actually believe that laws stop crime? DUMB!

....and the counter "reasons" they have againsts such a proposal are some intellectually limited and flawed it's almost comical.

They are intellectually above your low IQ comprehension level. You actually believe that laws prevent crime. Really DUMB
 
translation: another intellectually impotent/cowardly/dishonest MAGA mook who can't concede a FACT, so he blathers "psychobabble" as if that solves everything. How much do you want to bet that this Resident Bonehead didn't even read the content of the link? It's not unusual for the MAGA mooks to proudly display willful ignorance. Not unlike the other MAGA moron who spews silly catch phrases and words at every turn.

Carry on.

Pratt

There were ZERO facts that support your claim of this "gun show loophole." It doesn't exist. It is a media fabrication. :palm:
 
Given how you MAGA morons keep voting against your interest and seem cool with mass shootings and such, I dare say you may be right. But as I said, you don't have a logical reason for your stance or be against what I state here and what is in the OP.

Tell me something, toodles...how does it feel to be a sucker for a gun lobby that puts profit over people?

There you go with the moronic lies and dumb strawmen. So, you think people are okay with mass shootings? That's not merely stupid, but a dumb lie.

What does the gun lobby have to do with criminal behavior? Again, guns are not the problem. But, leftist socialist policies are.
 
:palm: God, you truly are fucking stupid.

THAT'S the point, you ignoramus! Clowns like you can go can literally sell your weapons anywhere to anyone without any type of registered legal transfer. So if you sell to someone you trust or access is trustworthy, then they in turn can do the same....problem is that the weapon can end up in the hands of criminals or nut cases, and how it got there is untraceable by cops. That's because a guy with no criminal record can buy this weapon for his criminal associates. He can also do this from a reputable licensed gun dealership. This contributes to an "iron pipeline", where criminals in a tough gun law state obtain the weapons purchased in the aforementioned way.

The OP and my oft repeated suggestion makes sure the original owner isn't guilty of a crime should the weapon be traced back to him....and the straw man purchaser for the criminal element can be identified.

Got it now, bunky? Or are you going to ignore everything and just parrot the SOS?

Again, a national registration system of ownership will do NOTHING to prevent a criminal from ..... wait for it....breaking laws. Historically, national gun registration systems have been useful to tyrannical governments in confiscating their citizens guns that might prevent them from ruling over the rubes.
 
Do you honestly believe that criminals will care about such a law? That they'll suddenly say, "well darn it, they want me to register it so I'll just have to pass!" How naive and dumb does one have to be to have such beliefs?



That's because people with brains know that it's an absurd and asinine proposal that will do NOTHING to stop gun crimes. Do you actually believe that laws stop crime? DUMB!



They are intellectually above your low IQ comprehension level. You actually believe that laws prevent crime. Really DUMB

And you're too stupid to realize that I'm not an anti-firearms zealot.
I just have reservations about para-military weapons.

I include none of those among my own nine firearms because I'm not an idiot, seditionist cracker.
 
Yeah, remember when that was the battle cry for our retarded resident MAGA mooks? I guess after 30 years of crying wolf, they're beginning to feel stupid saying that crap out loud.

Ironic in that the only ones constantly crying out wolf are the same dunces shrieking "BUT TRUMP." You don't have any self-awareness, do you halfwit? :palm:
 
Yep, just as I thought....our cowardly little former Oather/Threeper doesn't (or won't) get it, so he's parroting the SOS. Not unexpected.

What doesn't he get that you think you get? Do you actually believe that more laws will stop criminals? Is there any data to support that laughably naive and stupid nonsense?
 
Really? Why? As a free citizen, why can't I sell my weapon to another private citizen without government interference? Is there some data I am unaware of that suggests criminals buy their gins from private citizens? LINK?



What the fuck is a "regular" citizen? Are there irregular citizens? Dumb.



You cannot believe in private ownership then claim one cannot sell their weapon to another private owner.



Another inane statement. You seem to be quite full of them. :palm:



Typical Fascist argument, I do it, so must you. Dumb.



Another asinine statement. Yep, sorry bud, but if you don't want to own that $2,000 AR15, you'll just have to suck it up and hand it over. Dumb.

You give new meaning for DUMB with every post.

You're nowhere near qualified to walk around freely among civilized people,
never mind dealing in firearms.

Your status as free individual is an indictment of American justice and mental health care alike,
but it's only a matter of time before you fuck up and go down. I'm pretty confident of that.
 
And you're too stupid to realize that I'm not an anti-firearms zealot.

You post like one. However, due to your low IQ level, you don't comprehend that much.

I just have reservations about para-military weapons.

Which one of these is a paramilitary weapon snowflake?

th


m4-carbine-on-white-background.jpg


I include none of those among my own nine firearms because I'm not an idiot, seditionist cracker.

There you go with the anecdotal bullshit again. Only an idiot thinks that his uneducated point of view makes everyone else a seditionist cracker.

I own what is considered an M4. Am I a seditionist? A cracker? If you answer yes to either, you're a dishonest presumptuous moron on steroids.
 
You post like one. However, due to your low IQ level, you don't comprehend that much.



Which one of these is a paramilitary weapon snowflake?

th


m4-carbine-on-white-background.jpg




.

The bottom weapon, even though it may be a civilian version without the three-shot automatic burst,
has no business being in the hands of civilians, and certainly not in the hands of an idiot like yourelf.

The picture is small, but the top one looks like a Garrand-type rifle without a fore stock.

That would be an antiquated military-style weapon, and while ugly as shit compared to a true sporting arm, it's suitable for civilian ownership.
It is top loading if it works like a Garrand, which is a super pain in the ass and not too fast to do, and it doesn't hold an excessive number of rounds.
 
Back
Top