Predictions?

I'm not "supporting" him, I am suggesting that the RR may not be as strong as you think. I am suggesting that specifically much of this is known already about Rudy and still he lingers as the "front-runner". (BTW - Early front-running almost always is an indicator that they will not be the nominee...)

What I am "suggesting" is that you may have to face somebody who is a fiscal conservative and not necessarily in bed with religion. That the R Party may just surprise itself.

Damo, you don't have to be on the relgious right to be freaked out by those pics. At least 80 percent if not more of hetero men of all parties and ideologies are going to do a double take there.
 
wow now your talking for hetero men, hope your right and he loses.
But get a grip, ever seen the lady hogs at a redskins game?
 
Damo, you don't have to be on the relgious right to be freaked out by those pics. At least 80 percent if not more of hetero men of all parties and ideologies are going to do a double take there.
Once again, many people already know about the pics. You act as if they are in a vacuum. Regardless he seems to still be the front-runner.

Cypress' point was the RR would run from him. They already have, yet he still is the current front-runner. It seems that the nomination may not necessarily be religious right. I think that Bush may have seriously curtailed that particular group for some time.

You keep attempting to suggest that I want him to win, I don't. I only point out that, even with most of this known, Rudy is front-running at the moment, this suggests that the RR may not be picking this next candidate.
 
most men don't think of gags dressing at parties as homo at all!!!
Republicans are retarded and behind the curve on everything but business, the only ones likely to be gay are the bible thumpers chasing the alter boys.
 
most men don't think of gags dressing at parties as homo at all!!!
Republicans are retarded and behind the curve on everything but business, the only ones likely to be gay are the bible thumpers chasing the alter boys.

One time is a gag, three times that are known, is a problem.
 
Duhla I'm guessing your under 35, I'm 47 I really don't get the comedy either but these 60 somethings have this fantasy that they are in one of thes old dean martin movies when they do this shit, it's high brow to them it's ewwwh ikky to anyone under 57ish.
 
Once again, many people already know about the pics. You act as if they are in a vacuum. Regardless he seems to still be the front-runner.

Cypress' point was the RR would run from him. They already have, yet he still is the current front-runner. It seems that the nomination may not necessarily be religious right. I think that Bush may have seriously curtailed that particular group for some time.

You keep attempting to suggest that I want him to win, I don't. I only point out that, even with most of this known, Rudy is front-running at the moment, this suggests that the RR may not be picking this next candidate.

BULLSHIT. What many "people know" is exactly what you tried to pass off on this thread. That he did it once as an SNL gag.

"Many people" have not seen these pictures.

Your second paragraph might be true, but I've seen no figures saying so. I don't think you want him to win, I don't even think you think he's going to win, I think you are arguing with me for the same reason you usually do; just for the heck of arguing with me.
 
Hmm and I thought the acceptance of homosexuality was becoming stronger because of the under 60 crowd...silly me...
 
Duhla I'm guessing your under 35, I'm 47 I really don't get the comedy either but these 60 somethings have this fantasy that they are in one of thes old dean martin movies when they do this shit, it's high brow to them it's ewwwh ikky to anyone under 57ish.

Maybe Top, but I have my doubts about this theory. We should ask Battlebourne, as the resident old fart he might be able to say for certain.

Battlebourne do men in your age group dress up as women because they think that they're in a Dean Martin movie? Do you do it?
 
you are really stupid USC, again go to school
this wasn't about homosexuality.
You are in the age group that likes this shit, but your class level is much more the toothless trailor trash.
This shit was done at fundraisers, people like Duhla come off looking like Shyrll Crow and the false outragers.
 
Damo check this out:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has opened up a 12 point lead in Iowa, according to a Des Moines Register poll released Monday.

Romney is the first choice of 30 percent of likely Republican Iowa caucus goers, while Arizona Sen. John McCain and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani are locked in a virtual tie for second place, 18 percent to 17 percent respectively. The remaining GOP candidates were in single digits.

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/
 
I've seen them on the news more than once.
I didn't think they were funny but I was inteligent enough to know that's was the goal.
 
Say what???

Maybe Top, but I have my doubts about this theory. We should ask Battlebourne, as the resident old fart he might be able to say for certain.

Battlebourne do men in your age group dress up as women because they think that they're in a Dean Martin movie? Do you do it?



Uhhh...No!...albeit I did like Dean Martin...and by the way he did have a bevy of foxes in tow...Me I just love to wear cut -offs,'T' shirts and flip flops...goes well at the lake,beer,bbq and boating ...would fly but had to give it up as the cost was prohibited on a fixed retirement income!
:tongout:
 
Uhhh...No!...albeit I did like Dean Martin...and by the way he did have a bevy of foxes in tow...Me I just love to wear cut -offs,'T' shirts and flip flops...goes well at the lake,beer,bbq and boating ...would fly but had to give it up as the cost was prohibited on a fixed retirement income!
:tongout:

I see. Apparently Top, men older than you or I, also do not dress up as women and believe they are in a Dean Martin flick.

Try again?
 
Bloomberg runs as an Independent with Hagel as his VP.

1) They are both moderates, not afraid to actually work with the opposing parties.

2) Bloomberg can afford to self finance and make it a point that he is not beholden to any individual, group or corporation.

3) They would crush any combo the Reps could come up with.

4) They would crush any combo the Dems could come up with.

5) They win.... Reps and Dems cry about how unfair it is not to have a two party system any more.
 
Bloomberg runs as an Independent with Hagel as his VP.

1) They are both moderates, not afraid to actually work with the opposing parties.

2) Bloomberg can afford to self finance and make it a point that he is not beholden to any individual, group or corporation.

3) They would crush any combo the Reps could come up with.

4) They would crush any combo the Dems could come up with.

5) They win.... Reps and Dems cry about how unfair it is not to have a two party system any more.

Gee, I'm so surprised that you are pushing an "Independent" ticket comprised of two Republicans.

When is it that you guys think we fell off the boat?
 
Bloomberg runs as an Independent with Hagel as his VP.

1) They are both moderates, not afraid to actually work with the opposing parties.

2) Bloomberg can afford to self finance and make it a point that he is not beholden to any individual, group or corporation.

3) They would crush any combo the Reps could come up with.

4) They would crush any combo the Dems could come up with.

5) They win.... Reps and Dems cry about how unfair it is not to have a two party system any more.

LOL, I doubt it. They are about as independent as Lieberman.
Or O'Liely.
 
Back
Top