Question for dipshit 3rd Party voters

What particular take are you talking about? Be specific. This is just generalized bullshit.

You don't seem to know anything about Nikki Haley.

Then ignore me, dear. It's not one thing, it's just a general sense of a feminine personality.

...but I'd vote for her anyway. :tongout:
 
No Flash, YOU don't understand how it works.

Voting 3P for POTUS doesn't magically qualify 3P candidates downballot.

And it's the downballot races you need to win in order to do any of what you want.

You focus solely on the executive because you want an authoritarian to force both sides to compromise on something neither wants because you can't pass any of it legislatively due to the fact that the 3P is a grift and your ideas are stupid.

You're just as authoritarian as anyone; you want an authoritarian to force an abstract compromise between two ideologically divided sides.

You have no clue about how the system works and I said nothing about the executive branch. Libertarians don't favor large oppressive government and would have no desire to rule by executive order like current 2 party system.

How do you think current systems work with multi-party systems? Do some research.
 
Say I get elected as a Libertarian, and I want a budget that I can sign that doesn't overspend like we're pretending that monetary policy doesn't have an effect on inflation. Now I can compromise and work out a solution with the two parties in congress, I'd begin by working with the one that holds majority personally regardless of whether they see everything my way. I'd begin with the reality, folks elected me for a reason, and it wasn't to cave to your every demand, so we need to get together and make a compromise... and we'd go from ther

MORE folks elected Biden for a reason in 2020, and unlike this hypothetical, Biden has allies in Congress to introduce and vote for his legislation.

The legislative process requires all bills to be submitted for a vote, starting in committee. If the 3P POTUS has no allies in Congress, and thus no members in the committees to introduce legislation, then who introduces their legislation and who votes for it?


You continue to pretend that everybody in congress is just never going to speak to someone that isn't in their party, or that someone not in their party cannot align with one of the two major parties, it happens all the time with Independents elected to Congress, or do you not realize that Bernie Sanders only becomes a Democrat when he wants to run for President?

It's not pretend, it's reality.

The reality is that there are two divided sides, with one that has given up on democracy and considers its opponents illegitimate.

So I'm not sure how a 3P POTUS uses the Force to convince both sides to do what they want.

Especially after you spent an entire campaign denigrating the very same people you now expect to do your heavy lifting for you.

Why the fuck would they? You have no leverage over them because you didn't bother to run enough candidates downballot to make threats like this.

So your entire strategy is to bully D's and R's into doing your legislative work for you after you just got done denigrating them and calling them "the duopoly" or whatever.
 
and you can find evidence of me supporting this retardo?

Open the link, loser.

Idaho becomes one of the most extreme anti-abortion states with law restricting travel for abortions
A bill that prohibits people in Idaho from helping pregnant minors leave the state to obtain abortions became law on Wednesday.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/wome...abortion-state-law-restricts-travel-rcna78225

Here's the legislation, shithead: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2023/legislation/H0242.pdf

Now go back to being a worthless board troll with no friends.
 
Open the link, loser.

Idaho becomes one of the most extreme anti-abortion states with law restricting travel for abortions
A bill that prohibits people in Idaho from helping pregnant minors leave the state to obtain abortions became law on Wednesday.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/wome...abortion-state-law-restricts-travel-rcna78225

Here's the legislation, shithead: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2023/legislation/H0242.pdf

Now go back to being a worthless board troll with no friends.

I didn't author that link dipshit. Did you get dropped on your head as a baby? nobody can be this stupid without something going wrong
 
biggest retard on these forums said:
Aren't you the ones who want to force women to take pregnancy tests before they cross state borders?

retard continues to post things I have never said, thought, or supported
:laugh:
derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp
 
Again, you fail to understand how the system works.

No, Flash, you don't understand how it works.

When you sign petitions to get certain people on the ballot, you're not signing a petition for the party to reserve slots in every single race that appears on that ballot.

You are only signing a petition for that SINGULAR candidate to appear in that SINGULAR race.

You have to do that process for every single race downballot.

That's what you don't seem to understand, either because you're a fascist or you're just a fucking idiot.


If the Libertarian Party (or any party) gets the required percentage of votes in 2024 then all candidates nominated by that party qualify to appear on the 2026 general election ballot.

Simply incorrect. You're completely wrong here. When you vote Libertarian for POTUS, you aren't qualifying Libertarian candidates downballot in future elections, you are only qualifying them for THAT specific election.

That's the process, not this thing you're improvising on the spot.


3rd parties typically nominate candidates by state convention rather than direct primary.

Doesn't make a fucking difference if they didn't attain enough signatures for each race to appear on the ballot.

That's why you hardly see any 3P's running downballot, even after what - 40 years of 3P candidates?

So you mean to tell me that for the last 40 years, 3P's have had the ability to run candidates in every single race, they have just chosen not to?
 
Nobody wants to give you any specific information because you always turn it into personal insults unrelated to the political debate and often based on false assumptions and poor memory. This post is a perfect example.

Then why did you open your big, fat, stupid fucking mouth about it, Flash?

You KNOW that I don't trust anything you say. You KNOW that I ask follow up questions. You KNOW these things about me yet you continue to play the victim.

The only thing you are a victim of is your big, fat, stupid fucking mouth that you just don't seem to be able to control.
 
Then ignore me, dear. It's not one thing, it's just a general sense of a feminine personality.

...but I'd vote for her anyway. :tongout:

So when prompted to say something, ANYTHING about your candidate, you deflect and get defensive.

So you don't really know anything about Haley, do you?
 
You have no clue about how the system works and I said nothing about the executive branch.

You're talking about voting for a 3P for POTUS, Flash...POTUS.

That is the Executive Branch, dipshit.

That is what we've been talking about this entire time; the fact that your 3P POTUS could only govern through fascist executive authority because they have zero allies in Congress or the courts to introduce, pass, and rule on the Constitutionality of the legislation their allies introduced in committee first.

You want to skip all that and just let your 3P rule by authority because your policies, platforms, and ideas are so terrible you can't even find the requisite number of candidates to appear downballot in order to even introduce that 3P legislation.

You are a narcissist because you vote D's and R's all the time...you said so yourself. So it's not about "the duopoly" or "both sides are the same" with you, it's about your fucking narcissism...which is what I've been saying this entire time.


Libertarians don't favor large oppressive government and would have no desire to rule by executive order like current 2 party system.

Of course they favor large oppressive government, that's the only way they would be able to govern.

You said yourself that the way a 3P POTUS reaches compromise is to be a bully.

Not that anyone would even want to reach compromise on 3P's terms since the 3P couldn't be bothered to run enough candidates downballot as leverage.
 
I didn't author that link dipshit. Did you get dropped on your head as a baby? nobody can be this stupid without something going wrong

You asked for evidence so I reposted the link AND the link to the legislation.

I can't help it that you have no balls and are a coward.
 
retard continues to post things I have never said, thought, or supported
:laugh:
derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp

Oh, so then I suppose you are pro-choice and think abortion is no one's business except for the woman and her doctor?
 
Oh, so then I suppose you are pro-choice and think abortion is no one's business except for the woman and her doctor?

I think self defense laws are decided by each state and I think you are too retarded to have a legit conversation on serious issues
 
Back
Top