Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

I take it you refuse to accept the facts stated by an expert.
Void argument fallacy. What 'facts'? What 'expert'?
Another liar that won't acknowledge his is a sock
I don't think you know what 'sock' means either. You seem to be rapidly losing the ability to communicate.
I guess you still refuse to accept the word of an expert.
You already said that. I'll add argument by repetition fallacy as well.
You couldn't be a man if you tried. It takes what you'll never have.
YALIF.
 
A cartridge is not an arm.
No? They can kill or maim. Why not?
It's what an arm fires.
No, you are referring to a specific type of arm, which makes use of another type of arm. Some arms don't use cartridges at all. Did you know that?
You should really spend some time in the gun business and learn the difference.
You should really spend some time learning what an 'arm' is.
That's what experts do
False authority fallacy. Divisional error fallacy. Not all arms are guns. Not all guns are arms.
and it's why experts know the difference.
False authority fallacy. It doesn't take an 'expert' to identify an 'arm'.
You simply want to troll just like you other sock accounts.
YALIF.
 
No? They can kill or maim. Why not?

No, you are referring to a specific type of arm, which makes use of another type of arm. Some arms don't use cartridges at all. Did you know that?

You should really spend some time learning what an 'arm' is.

False authority fallacy. Divisional error fallacy. Not all arms are guns. Not all guns are arms.

False authority fallacy. It doesn't take an 'expert' to identify an 'arm'.

YALIF.

Again, you lack any knowledge to speak intelligently on this topic.

Spent many years learning what is and isn't an arm. You refuse to accept the truth.

A cartridge isn't an arm no matter how many times you claim it is.

Apparently it does take an expert to do so. It's not about authority. It's about knowledge you obviously don't have.

Your StoneByStone sock is far more interesting. That sock is as stupid as this one but more interesting.
 
Void argument fallacy. What 'facts'? What 'expert'?

I don't think you know what 'sock' means either. You seem to be rapidly losing the ability to communicate.

You already said that. I'll add argument by repetition fallacy as well.

YALIF.

This sock of yours is as stupid as the niggers on the forum.
 
If banning guns is pointless because people can just get guns on the black market, is banning abortion also pointless?

People break every law there is. Why have any laws at all. Lets have no streets, no police, no services, no rights... ....just law of the jungle where we kill the weak and take what we want.

Laws against murder need to be ion the books even though people will commit murder. Abortion is murder.

Our Constitutional Right to bear arms must always be fought to be protected against the extremist socialist Left.
 
People break every law there is. Why have any laws at all. Lets have no streets, no police, no services, no rights... ....just law of the jungle where we kill the weak and take what we want.

Laws against murder need to be ion the books even though people will commit murder. Abortion is murder.

Our Constitutional Right to bear arms must always be fought to be protected against the extremist socialist Left.

So is that a yes?
 
Law and order is what saved the West. And it will take law and order again to get a hold of the unnecessary gun deaths aimed at school children and kindergartens across America. Talk about some cowardly acts- shooting up kids is about as cowardly as I have ever seen.

The Good news, there are about to be some New Sheriffs coming to DC .....In 2020! And they are going to make Good on you Bad and Ugly!

97AFs1z.gif
There has never been a gun control law that has actually made things better. And all of your wishful thinking won't change that.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Are you talking about the 20,000 laws written by the NRA Lobby to turn us back into the Wild West?

Prepare yourself for a revolutionary change in gun laws as you know them.

Watch what becomes of the word "INFRINGED"! You'll have a better understanding of that term and also the word "Militia" before this is all through!

You'll have to find something else, other than a couple of misplaced words in our Constitution, to use as an excuse from now on!

You appear to be snorting coke. There are no "20,000 laws written by the NRA". It's clear that you want to destroy the Constitution, and the country.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Again, you lack any knowledge to speak intelligently on this topic.
YALIF.
Spent many years learning what is and isn't an arm.
Bull.
You refuse to accept the truth.
What 'truth'? Yours??
A cartridge isn't an arm no matter how many times you claim it is.
Why not?
Apparently it does take an expert to do so. It's not about authority.
False authority fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (authority<->void).
It's about knowledge you obviously don't have.
YALIF
Your StoneByStone sock is far more interesting.
I don't have a sock. You are obviously showing yourself of being a moron because you are completely unaware of my responses to the moron StoneByStone.
That sock is as stupid as this one but more interesting.
YALIF.
 
People break every law there is.
True.
Why have any laws at all.
Because certain behaviors have been deemed damaging to society and people are punished for them when they commit them.
Lets have no streets,
A street is not a law.
no police,
Police is not a law.
no services,
Services is not a law.
no rights...
Rights are not a law.
....just law of the jungle
where we kill the weak
and take what we want.
Is that really what you want? Anarchy doesn't work.
Laws against murder need to be ion the books even though people will commit murder.
True.
Abortion is murder.
Abortion for convenience is murder. Abortion to save the life of the mother or in the case where the mother was raped is not.
Our Constitutional Right to bear arms must always be fought to be protected against the extremist socialist Left.
True. The Constitution does not give us that right. It only acknowledges it. The right is inherent in Man simply as Man. Every animal, every plant, every living thing has the right to defend itself to the best of its ability. Man is no exception.
 
Not by definition, they're not arms. They aren't required for the arm to function. Don't take that as I believe they can be banned. They simply don't meet the definition.

Firing a cartridge involves a process that can only be done by a firearm.

Who's definition, yours???

Define 'arms'.
 
YALIF.

Bull.

What 'truth'? Yours??

Why not?

False authority fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (authority<->void).

YALIF

I don't have a sock. You are obviously showing yourself of being a moron because you are completely unaware of my responses to the moron StoneByStone.

YALIF.

You've been bettered by your superiors, boy. Face it. You're as dumb as the average nigger which is below average by default.
 
Back
Top