G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Awesome.
Just like the gunlover cult, survivalists are totally possessed by fear.
Just like the gunlover cult, survivalists are totally possessed by fear.
Only if the survivalist neighbors shoot first. The folks who require help will just be knocking on doors.
What is telling is it appears the survivalists would see children die rather than share if your posts are an accurate representation.
Ummm no. Your entire argument is flawed in a serious way. Here is how it would likely go down.
Survivalist has house full of supploes, water, guns, other stuff (radio, medicine, etc). Catastrophe strikes. Survivalist calls his/her buddies (some of whom are also equally prepared). Thus a network is formed. Said network bands together. Unprepared and unconnected community is unable to compete. Some will join if they have something to contribute themselves. Those that don't, most likely will die. It is sad, but what good would come from freely giving when the group in need is larger than the available supply? All that would happen is that the whole community would screw themselves and doom everyone, instead of the few who were smart/talented enough to survive doing so.
proper planning. this means that I either have a before hand agreement with my neighbors or a preplanned rally point with other survivalists. this means that my house may be undefended, but my stores are with me somewhere else.A network is formed and band together? Do you mean they all move into one house? If the survivalist comes to the aid of another guy 6 blocks away that means his home is undefended.
you're obviously missing the reason for the beginning of those riots, which was the murder of an unarmed citizen. The police using lethal force now would be like lighting a gas station on fire. It's not even comparable to a private individual/group of individuals defending themselves and their famiies. lethal force is the first and only means of defense.Just look at the recent mob riots. Even the Police, which greatly out number the few survivalists, have difficulty with crowd control.
that may be, but it merely enforces the image that the hypocrite liberals/statists actually prefer the slash and burn method when it's done by themselves. the question is, how many of you are willing to risk certain death as compared to possibly dying?It's wishful thinking a survivalist would survive unless they have a bunker of some sort. The mob will also have guns and access to things like construction equipment. Raise the blade in the bulldozer and CHARGE! Come out and share or be buried in the rubble that was once your home.
then maybe you should consider stockpiling for yourselves as well.I do agree the entire community would be doomed. That's why it makes it a thing to be avoided at all costs.
I really don't see the purpose of preparing for an extended period of severe conditions.
no kidding. you've already stated that you'd just kill your neighbors and steal theirs.
Now, now. I never said I'd do that but I bet people with young children who don't have any food will expect their neighbor to share if they have some. In the words of Ms. Palin they'll be like a mama grisly.
Bears store food for later.Now, now. I never said I'd do that but I bet people with young children who don't have any food will expect their neighbor to share if they have some. In the words of Ms. Palin they'll be like a mama grisly.
Come and get it fool. Your emergency plan is to steal from other people. Mine is to keep looters like you the frick away from my family.
Survivalists in urban and suburban areas won't have a chance. To paraphrase George-the Wild West cowboy-Bush, "We'll smoke 'em out. Hee. Hee. Hee."
How is that? they're hungry, my group is not. They're unarmed. My group is armed. We are in a known defensive position. The un armed hungry people are in an offensive with most likely no intelligence of the area they're trying to take. They'll be slaughtered.Survivalists in urban and suburban areas won't have a chance. To paraphrase George-the Wild West cowboy-Bush, "We'll smoke 'em out. Hee. Hee. Hee."
I wrote, "I can see the validity of having a week's supply of food in the case a storm knocks out roads, etc. but things return to normal after a short period of time."
Do you have any documentation of the opposite?
I live rurally. However, my bet is survivalists in the urban and suburban areas will be better armed than you. You've already said you have no plan other than to take from those that prepared.
It is most likely I'll never need it other than during the next blizzard. But we have food enough to last quite some time.
The government is a union of looters, AHZ.
And the captains of industry are what? oh yeah, the ones who control the government.
You're the one stating that things always return to normal quickly. I believe they may or may not return to normal quickly. I don't profess to know how things always go. You do, however. Why are you certain things will always return to normal quickly? The past does not predict the future.