Real 3rd Party Scare.

[anonymoose]

Since they are city DAs in three different states, I fail to see how Frank can support them.

If he lived in those states he would.

I will vote for the Democratic Party candidates almost exclusively,

FWIW, since crime is up in their cities, I expect they won't be DAs for long...unless city voters want them to be.

Frank doesn't care. They're dims and that's all that matters. He's a city voter and he's ok with dim D.A.s letting repeat violent criminals walk freely as long as it's a dim D.A that's letting them do so.

Are you against voting for DAs?

Of course not. Stupid question.

Do you favor autocracy over a fair election system?

Most voters have one overriding issue when it comes to voting. For me it's crime and dealing harshly with violent criminals so they are not on the streets, basically 3rd and 4th on the list so I'm not far from the mainstream. Second for me would be the federal budget deficit, something only the Bill Clinton admin successfully dealt with since the '60's, along with a republican congress. Last time I can remember when the president and an opposing party in congress was able to compromise successfully for the good of the country.

For most voters this year it's inflation:



For Frank (and you I suspect) the one overriding issue with him is.... TRUMP ! which doesn't even show up on any surveys I've seen.

Because I've had innocent people close to me murdered AFAIC anyone who votes for a politician that sides with violent criminals is an accessory to murder.
Frank thinks I'm a Nazi because I haven't voted for a dim in a while regardless of the fact I haven't voted for a republican in a nat'l election since my vote for Bob Dole.
You seem to think I'm a Trumpster MAGA only because I think Brandon is a doddering senile old fool.
To each their own I guess.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

NOTE coronavirus is last.

everyone knows that's a hoax too.

2020 election and covid.

two fat lies.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Most voters have one overriding issue when it comes to voting. For me it's crime and dealing harshly with violent criminals so they are not on the streets, basically 3rd and 4th on the list so I'm not far from the mainstream. Second for me would be the federal budget deficit, something only the Bill Clinton admin successfully dealt with since the '60's, along with a republican congress. Last time I can remember when the president and an opposing party in congress was able to compromise successfully for the good of the country.

For most voters this year it's inflation:



For Frank (and you I suspect) the one overriding issue with him is.... TRUMP ! which doesn't even show up on any surveys I've seen.

Agreed on crime, but you seem worried about gang-bangers when it's the crooks in DC who, as you pointed out, are bankrupting the nation.

Disagreed that the attempted coup on 1/6 should be swept under the rug just because you favor the traitor who organized it.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

insurrection didn't make the list either.

the dem narrative is failing bigly.

 

[Ross Dolan]

You have no idea what a fact is. Define the word 'fact' for all of us, right here right now:

Go fuck yourself...right here and now.

 

[gfm7175]

Go fuck yourself...right here and now.

So you can't do it?? Got it.

 

[anonymoose]

Agreed on crime, but you seem worried about gang-bangers when it's the crooks in DC who, as you pointed out, are bankrupting the nation.

The crooks in D.C. did not murder those close to me. As far as gang-bangers I don't care if they kill each other. Good riddance to them. Just don't murder me, my close friends or family members.

Disagreed that the attempted coup on 1/6 should be swept under the rug

Me too. Who are you disagreeing with? Those in the opinion polls that show no one cares?

just because you favor the traitor who organized it.

I didn't know Rand Paul organized it. I'll have to pay closer attention. But since you informed me that he did I no longer support Rand.

 

[Ross Dolan]

So you can't do it?? Got it.

Awww...I wouldn't jump through you hoop?

And now you are going to sulk.

Fucking jerkoff.

You want a definition...Google it.

In the meantime, I will continue to fuck with you assholes.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

The crooks in D.C. did not murder those close to me. As far as gang-bangers I don't care if they kill each other. Good riddance to them. Just don't murder me, my close friends or family members.

Me too. Who are you disagreeing with? Those in the opinion polls that show no one cares?

I didn't know Rand Paul organized it. I'll have to pay closer attention. But since you informed me that he did I no longer support Rand.

So who did murder those close to you? If any?

You. You're the one pointing at 1/6 and saying it should be ignored because "TRUMP!" is involved.

You're free to play HS level games. I encourage it since it's revealing about a person's intellect, maturity and ability to reason.

 

[gfm7175]

Awww...I wouldn't jump through you hoop?

Nah, you just pussied out. Typical.

And now you are going to sulk.

I am laughing at you, actually.

Fucking jerkoff.

Sucks to be you.

You want a definition...Google it.

I didn't ask Google; I asked you. Can you not think for yourself?

In the meantime, I will continue to fuck with you assholes.

You aren't fucking with anyone; you are just being a pussy.

 

[anonymoose]

So who did murder those close to you? If any?

All three were violent criminals in N.O. None were in D.C. All three had a previous history of violent crime and all three were out on bail or had an early release from prison. If they were in gangs, that's something I wouldn't know. Possibly, probably considering who they were and their upbringing.

You. You're the one pointing at 1/6 and saying it should be ignored because "TRUMP!" is involved.

Repost where I stated that.

You're free to play HS level games. I encourage it since it's revealing about a person's intellect, maturity and ability to reason.

You are the one who said, "you favor the traitor who organized it". Rand would be my favored candidate for pres.

 

[anonymoose]

NOTE coronavirus is last.

everyone knows that's a hoax too.

2020 election and covid.

two fat lies.

At least it's on voters' minds. Appears Jan. 6 is a non-issue.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

At least it's on voters' minds. Appears Jan. 6 is a non-issue.

definitely.

only fanatical deep staters think its a thing.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

All three were violent criminals in N.O. None were in D.C. All three had a previous history of violent crime and all three were out on bail or had an early release from prison. If they were in gangs, that's something I wouldn't know. Possibly, probably considering who they were and their upbringing.
Repost where I stated that.
You are the one who said, "you favor the traitor who organized it". Rand would be my favored candidate for pres.

That's a Louisiana problem, not a Federal problem. Why do you want to make it a Federal problem? Do you understand by giving them that power you'll never get it back?

The one I originally quoted; the one you posted "TRUMP !" There are others, but that's the most recent. Regardless if you admit it or not, you clearly are no concerned about the actions by our national leaders on 1/6 nor the heavy influence of the WSEs on the WH. I'm curious why you don't see white terrorism as a national problem.

Sorry, not seeing what you mean about Rand. You seem to have a blind spot for Mr. T. Why?

Since they are city DAs in three different states, I fail to see how Frank can support them.

FWIW, since crime is up in their cities, I expect they won't be DAs for long...unless city voters want them to be.

Are you against voting for DAs? Do you favor autocracy over a fair election system?

 

[anonymoose]

That's a Louisiana problem, not a Federal problem.

It's a soft on crime George Soros backed democrat D.A. problem.

Why do you want to make it a Federal problem?

It's a soft on crime democrat George Soros backed democrat D.A. problem.

Do you understand by giving them that power you'll never get it back?

I'm not powerful enough to give anybody any power except my wife.

The one I originally quoted; the one you posted "TRUMP !"

I post "TRUMP!" and you take that as me favoring him? Explain.

There are others,

Nope. Unless you consider posting the word 'TRUMP' as somehow favoring him. You're not right, are you?

Regardless if you admit it or not, you clearly are no concerned about the actions by our national leaders on 1/6 nor the heavy influence of the WSEs on the WH.

I don't know what WSEs are but yes I'm mildly concerned and hope that anyone who broke the law serves time in prison.

I'm curious why you don't see white terrorism as a national problem.

Minor in comparison to many other national problems. White terrorists have never had a milligram of effect on me or anyone I know for that matter. But yes, they are a problem.

Sorry, not seeing what you mean about Rand.

You said the person I favor organized the attack on the capitol. I favored Rand for president.

You seem to have a blind spot for Mr. T. Why?

Because that's the way you perceive anyone who thinks independently and not lockstep with the loons. "Seem" is the correct word - for you.
The reality is that I ridicule you and Frank and the rest of the loons here who obsess over Trump day and night who've been posting for 5.5+ years about how the latest investigation, impeachment, phone call, speech, whatever would finally "get" Trump. . That would be my only favoritism. I favor ridiculing you for your obsession with Trump, Trump, Trump.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

It's a soft on crime George Soros backed democrat D.A. problem. It's a soft on crime democrat George Soros backed democrat D.A. problem. I'm not powerful enough to give anybody any power except my wife.

I post "TRUMP!" and you take that as me favoring him? Explain. Nope. Unless you consider posting the word 'TRUMP' as somehow favoring him. You're not right, are you?

I don't know what WSEs are but yes I'm mildly concerned and hope that anyone who broke the law serves time in prison. Minor in comparison to many other national problems. White terrorists have never had a milligram of effect on me or anyone I know for that matter. But yes, they are a problem.

You said the person I favor organized the attack on the capitol. I favored Rand for president. Because that's the way you perceive anyone who thinks independently and not lockstep with the loons. "Seem" is the correct word - for you.

The reality is that I ridicule you and Frank and the rest of the loons here who obsess over Trump day and night who've been posting for 5.5+ years about how the latest investigation, impeachment, phone call, speech, whatever would finally "get" Trump. . That would be my only favoritism. I favor ridiculing you for your obsession with Trump, Trump, Trump.

What does your obsession with Jewish money have to do with N.O. voters electing a LW dumbass?

It's not the first time you wanted to sweep 1/6 under the rug to focus on something else or Biden.

WSEs are White Supremacist Extremists. It's in multiple DHS reports. Example: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/reference-aid-us-violent-white-supremacist-extremists
Violent White Supremacist Extremists (WSE) are defined as individuals who seek, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence, to support their belief in the intellectual and moral superiority of the white race over other races.

Your posts often favor Trump, as I'm pointing out here, or attack Biden. Clearly you're as biased as you accuse others of being. It's called projection.

It's a free country and you're free to ridicule anyone you like for whatever ridiculous reasons you like. As your lack of knowledge about WSEs prove, you're not as UpToDate on national security as you believe yourself to be. LOL

 

[anonymoose]

What does your obsession with Jewish money have to do with N.O. voters electing a LW dumbass?

Obessesion? With Jewish money? Can you show me any posts I've ever made regarding 'Jewish money'?

It's not the first time you wanted to sweep 1/6 under the rug to focus on something else or Biden.

In what way do I sweep Jan. 6 under the rug. I'm hoping that everyone who broke the law is prosecuted. I've said that several times.

WSEs are White Supremacist Extremists. It's in multiple DHS reports. Example: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/reference-aid-us-violent-white-supremacist-extremists
Violent White Supremacist Extremists (WSE) are defined as individuals who seek, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence, to support their belief in the intellectual and moral superiority of the white race over other races.

Thanks.

Your posts often favor Trump,as I'm pointing out here,

All you're pointing out is your obsession w/ Trump. He's not the president anymore. You don't seem to understand that.
Imagine if I constantly made posts regarding the lifelong corruption of Hillary despite the fact she's never been prosecuted. You'd think I was nuts.

or attack Biden.

FFS, everybody does. Even the NYT, CNN and Slate. HE's the fuckup we have as president now. Not Trump. You seem too be to thick to understand that.

Clearly you're as biased as you accuse others of being.

No, more actually. I'm biased against most presidents.

It's called projection.

Yes. I project independent thought. Loons can't handle that.

It's a free country and you're free to ridicule anyone you like for whatever ridiculous reasons you like.

And I'll continue to do so.

As your lack of knowledge about WSEs prove, you're not as UpToDate on national security as you believe yourself to be. LOL

Sure I am. I believe I'm not up to date on national security at all. I live in AK and Big Island, HI. I'm not exposed to the riff raff of the Lower 48. We seem to agree there.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Obessesion? With Jewish money? Can you show me any posts I've ever made regarding 'Jewish money'?
In what way do I sweep Jan. 6 under the rug. I'm hoping that everyone who broke the law is prosecuted. I've said that several times.

Thanks.

All you're pointing out is your obsession w/ Trump. He's not the president anymore. You don't seem to understand that.
Imagine if I constantly made posts regarding the lifelong corruption of Hillary despite the fact she's never been prosecuted. You'd think I was nuts. FFS, everybody does. Even the NYT, CNN and Slate. HE's the fuckup we have as president now. Not Trump. You seem too be to thick to understand that. No, more actually. I'm biased against most presidents.
Yes. I project independent thought. Loons can't handle that.
And I'll continue to do so. Sure I am. I believe I'm not up to date on national security at all. I live in AK and Big Island, HI. I'm not exposed to the riff raff of the Lower 48. We seem to agree there.

It's the standard "globalist" rhetoric to attack Jews like George Soros. What about Musk and all the other billionaires out there giving money to political goals. Why did you choose the Jew? I can guess. LOL

Sorry, I don't do text walls. To the Bolded:

Agreed on convicting all criminals including Trump if he broke the law or, more likely, if Junior broke the law.

When you falsely accuse, you lie. That makes you a liar. JPP is full of scumbag liars so what makes your lying any better or worse?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I've been saying this since the Republicans and the Democrats conspired to keep Ralph Nader from the final Presidential Debates years ago. Remember folks, the 2 Party system needs to CHANGE .... and the Democrats are NOT exactly friendly to the idea. Here's comedian and social commentator Jimmy Dore on the subject:

Ain't happening, beyond the local and in a few cases on the State level, the reality is it is next to impossible. Election rules and regulations work against it, and as history has shown us, any good and popular idea or policy a third party comes up with the two major parties quickly assimilate the concept

Don't be too sure....because the old guard GOP didn't see the Teabagger take over of a LOT of their state & local positions, much less a few yahoos in the House. And you've got to wonder how much further can people be pushed with all the "legal" chicanery of gerry-mandering, The Wall St. scandal, Big Pharma machinations, corporatization and crap like what happened to the "Occupy Wall St." before they take a cue from the Europeans and take to the streets?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No one is perfect, but the closest to not being evil was Jimmy Carter, then Sanders (despite the latter's voting record). Ralph Nader tops the list. IMHO, of course

I think we can all name somebody we think is not evil, but unless enough other voters agree with us they have no chance of being elected. Carter was the only one of the above that got enough support, and he was hardly a success.

People can only be pushed so far before they take the cue from the Europeans and take to the streets or tell the old guard politicians to get out of the way.