Real 3rd Party Scare.

HE DID CHANGE THE DYNAMIC...OF THAT ELECTION.

Gore lost...George W. Bush won.

And Nader was a significant factor in that lose/win.

THAT is a matter of fact...a matter of history.

Nader's 3% votes did influence the 2000 election but not as much as Perot's 19% impact on GHW Bush in 1992.

So what? Is someone advising banning Third Party candidates? There's banning assholes on both sides of the JPP extremist aisle.

Yes, it's a problem. The best solution I see is ranked voting for all elections.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_...al_election#Ralph_Nader_"spoiler"_controversy
Many Gore supporters claimed that third-party candidate Nader acted as a spoiler in the election, under the presumption that Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not been in the race.[91] Nader received 2.74 percent of the popular vote nationwide, getting 97,000 votes in Florida (by comparison, there were 111,251 overvotes)[92][93] and 22,000 votes in New Hampshire, where Bush beat Gore by 7,000 votes. Winning either state would have won the general election for Gore. Defenders of Nader, including Dan Perkins, argued that the margin in Florida was small enough that Democrats could blame any number of third-party candidates for the defeat, including Workers World Party candidate Monica Moorehead, who received 1,500 votes.[94]
 
this is your primal scream of agonized defeat.

:magagrin:

Funny you should think that.

This is the reality:

ray-liotta-laughing.gif
 
Nader's 3% votes did influence the 2000 election but not as much as Perot's 19% impact on GHW Bush in 1992.

So what? Is someone advising banning Third Party candidates? There's banning assholes on both sides of the JPP extremist aisle.

Yes, it's a problem. The best solution I see is ranked voting for all elections.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_...al_election#Ralph_Nader_"spoiler"_controversy

I will agree with you once again. I hope you can take YES for an answer.
 
What is it that you are considering a lie, AssWipe.

I have not lied about anything.

Try to get it together. I did not mean to frazzle you quite this much.

you've supported The "trumps a russian agent" narrative for many years.

you're a full of shit liar and everybody knows it, just like dems and globalists in general.
 
you've supported The "trumps a russian agent" narrative for many years.

I defy you to find a post of mine anywhere where I said that Trump is a Russian agent...or that indicates that I support the allegation that Trump is a Russian agent.

I DEFY YOU TO DO IT!

Since you are saying that I have done it for many years...should be a piece of cake. (Piece of advice: Don't put any time into this, because I HAVE NEVER DONE IT.)

you're a full of shit liar and everybody knows it, just like dems and globalists in general.

You are the one who is full of shit, but I doubt you have the ethical wherewithal to acknowledge it.
 
I defy you to find a post of mine anywhere where I said that Trump is a Russian agent...or that indicates that I support the allegation that Trump is a Russian agent.

I DEFY YOU TO DO IT!

Since you are saying that I have done it for many years...should be a piece of cake. (Piece of advice: Don't put any time into this, because I HAVE NEVER DONE IT.)



You are the one who is full of shit, but I doubt you have the ethical wherewithal to acknowledge it.

You definitely were doing if for years.

Your denial is hilarious.
 
Back
Top