Reality check on electric cars

What is the argument against overpopulation resulting in the unpopular need to reduce our carbon footprint?

Couples replace themselves with two kids. If they have more, the earth becomes overpopulated quickly.
There was already going to be population increase because people live longer.

People who could afford it the least had more than two and severely damaged the planet.
Equally bad, people who were not by any reasonable standard breeding material at all had offspring to contribute to the problem.

Now we can't have decent cars anymore, not to mention other miserable sacrifices that may be required.
I wouldn't bring a child into the dystopic world that we have created because I have a conscience.

What argument could be presented against that? No reasonable one. We're fucking ass deep in people, and that depleted the planet, damaging its inhabitability.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
What is the argument against overpopulation resulting in the unpopular need to reduce our carbon footprint?

Couples replace themselves with two kids. If they have more, the earth becomes overpopulated quickly.
There was already going to be population increase because people live longer.

People who could afford it the least had more than two and severely damaged the planet.
Equally bad, people who were not by any reasonable standard breeding material at all had offspring to contribute to the problem.

Now we can't have decent cars anymore, not to mention other miserable sacrifices that may be required.
I wouldn't bring a child into the dystopic world that we have created because I have a conscience.

What argument could be presented against that? No reasonable one. We're fucking ass deep in people, and that depleted the planet, damaging its inhabitability.
Click to expand...

The surest way to end overpopulation is to lift people out of poverty. That is best done by making basic goods and services as cheap as possible. That means cheap energy and food among other things. That, in turn, means abandoning the radical Leftist Green agenda in its entirety.

That would be a start to fixing overpopulation. After all, it isn't the First World countries that are overpopulated.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The surest way to end overpopulation is to lift people out of poverty. That is best done by making basic goods and services as cheap as possible. That means cheap energy and food among other things. That, in turn, means abandoning the radical Leftist Green agenda in its entirety.

That would be a start to fixing overpopulation. After all, it isn't the First World countries that are overpopulated.
Click to expand...

Quite right, since the concept of 'overpopulation' is a socialist one, borne out of the costs a government must bear because of having to pay for the socialism.

Of course, they just steal from the people to make those payments, but they would rather the money they steal went to themselves. The theft itself causes the very poverty they promise to eliminate.

Higher costs mean less for the Elite government.


All forms of socialism have an Elite. All forms separate people into 'classes', with The Elite at the top. The Elite figure they are smarter, better, 'pure', and more deserving of the wealth (and are willing to just steal it from) the masses, which created that wealth through their own sweat and work.
 
Last edited:
Into the Night said:
Quite right, since the concept of 'overpopulation' is a socialist one, borne out of the costs a government must bear because of having to pay for the socialism.

Of course, they just steal from the people to make those payments, but they would rather the money they steal went to themselves. The theft itself causes the very poverty they promise to eliminate.

Higher costs mean less for the Elite government.


All forms of socialism have an Elite. All forms separate people into 'classes', with The Elite at the top. The Elite figure they are smarter, better, 'pure', and more deserving of the wealth (and are willing to just steal it from) the masses, which created that wealth through their own sweat and work.
Click to expand...

Overpopulation is not political. It is strictly numbers of people using resources and food while polluting as people do. We live on a globe with finite resources and room.
 
Into the Night said:
Quite right, since the concept of 'overpopulation' is a socialist one, borne out of the costs a government must bear because of having to pay for the socialism.

Of course, they just steal from the people to make those payments, but they would rather the money they steal went to themselves. The theft itself causes the very poverty they promise to eliminate.

Higher costs mean less for the Elite government.


All forms of socialism have an Elite. All forms separate people into 'classes', with The Elite at the top. The Elite figure they are smarter, better, 'pure', and more deserving of the wealth (and are willing to just steal it from) the masses, which created that wealth through their own sweat and work.
Click to expand...

Gotta say, it's HILARIOUS to see the political ramblings of the man who DIDN'T KNOW SWEDEN HAD LAND ABOVE THE ARCTIC CIRCLE!
 
Into the Night said:
Quite right, since the concept of 'overpopulation' is a socialist one, borne out of the costs a government must bear because of having to pay for the socialism.

Of course, they just steal from the people to make those payments, but they would rather the money they steal went to themselves. The theft itself causes the very poverty they promise to eliminate.

Higher costs mean less for the Elite government.


All forms of socialism have an Elite. All forms separate people into 'classes', with The Elite at the top. The Elite figure they are smarter, better, 'pure', and more deserving of the wealth (and are willing to just steal it from) the masses, which created that wealth through their own sweat and work.
Click to expand...

"some animals are more equal than others"

all it ever is different groups vying to be the ones skimming the populace.
 
Into the Night said:
So saying that people grow food and make their own resources is 'playing opposites'???????!? You don't even make sense!
Click to expand...

Playing opposites is your schtick. It is how you play the game instead of discussing anything. People growing their own food is dead. Extremely few do it. It has no relevance. You cannot handle the truth. So you grab some esoteric piece of data and claim it is universal. It is a game and dishonest.
 
Nordberg said:
Playing opposites is your schtick. It is how you play the game instead of discussing anything.
Click to expand...
Nonsense statement.
Nordberg said:
People growing their own food is dead. Extremely few do it.
Click to expand...
People grow food. I suggest you go visit a farm and see how it's done.
Nordberg said:
It has no relevance.
Click to expand...
You DO like to eat, right?
Nordberg said:
You cannot handle the truth.
Click to expand...
No, that would be you.
Nordberg said:
So you grab some esoteric piece of data and claim it is universal.
Click to expand...
Nonsense statement.
Nordberg said:
It is a game and dishonest.
Click to expand...
Nonsense statement.
 
Why is Milquetoast Macaw still around?

His/her/it's grip on Aristotelian logic is non-existent,
and he/she/it isn't stupid-funny enough to justify the length of his/her/it's posts.

Stupid without being stupid-funny leaves one with no redeeming qualities as a forum participant.
 
Into the Night said:
Nonsense statement.

People grow food. I suggest you go visit a farm and see how it's done.

You DO like to eat, right?

No, that would be you.

Nonsense statement.

Nonsense statement.
Click to expand...

Are you actually saying I do not know what a farm is? That is nonsense. However it is almost all food conglomerates that grow the crops. https://www.theguardian.com/environ...nies,ordinary Americans, new analysis reveals. How do you get around and not know the country you live in?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top