There is nothing rational about you.
This is precisely what I'm talking about. You cant even be honest about the facts. Plenty of evidence of collusion? Mueller found no evidence of it. Plenty evidence of obstruction? Firing Comey please. Even Mueller said he was not "curtailed" by trump in his investigation.
Without collusion obstruction is a crap salad. I believe in our country its innocent until proven guilty. You guys have it backwards but for trump only. That's proof of TDS in my view.
Now the only evidence of a crime seems to have been committed by those high level FBI, DOJ, and CIA agents who are documented as having taken actions that appear to be criminal conspiracy to deceive the FISA courts, spy on a political opponent, and attempt a soft coup. They actually DID what they are accuseing trump of doing. Even your beloved Comey is now saying he made "mistakes" lol.
Funny how you are willing to make long leaps to connect the dots to prove crimes for trump but when every piece of evidence supports the opposite you go out of your way to dispel it. Furthur TDS evidence.
Over 1000 former federal prosecutors have indicated that many of the obstruction charges are criminally prosecutable.
FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
____________
Obstruction of justice - 18 USC 1501-1521
Witness intimidation 18 USC 1512
Emoluments - US Constitution
Abuse of power - no statute. Merely reason to be removed from office
Extortion – 18 USC 112
Solicitation of something of value from a foreign entity - 11CFR 110.2 and 11 CFR 300.2
______________
Extortion – 4 elements
Threat – withholding $400 million
Intent – Forcing public announcement of investigations
Fear – of loss of funding for defensive weapons against the Russians
Property – the thing of value is the investigations of 2016 tampering and the Bidens
