gfm7175
Mega MAGA
"Is", or "was"?Correct. That's also what's Jesse Richard Morgan is.
Can you show me? I genuinely don't know anything about the guy.
"Is", or "was"?Correct. That's also what's Jesse Richard Morgan is.
Now you are conflating the two of us, quite the testament to your poor judgement.It seems like I’m the only one, between the two of us, who is trying to be objective and honest.
You haven't been honest yet.What am I lying about.
Yes, it absolutely is, if you want We the People to believe you instead of believing him. I shouldn't have to tell you that you aren't faring well in that regard.It’s not our job to refute his claim.
Nope. His job was simply to document what he observed in a sworn affidavit. Any sworn testimony from you would be "I wasn't paying attention, so now I just make up shit and cast dispersions."He needs to convince us that his tale is true and that we should believe him.
ZenMode is kneejerking "He's a known charlatan; just ask my Climate minister.""Is", or "was"? Can you show me? I genuinely don't know anything about the guy.
Yes, it absolutely is, if you want We the People to believe you instead of believing him. I shouldn't have to tell you that you aren't faring well in that regard.
Right. Anyone can claim/document anything. People who believe the earth is flat or that the moon landing was fake can document lots of stuff or anyone who will read it. The question is believability.Nope. His job was simply to document what he observed in a sworn affidavit. Any sworn testimony from you would be "I wasn't paying attention, so now I just make up shit and cast dispersions."
"Is", or "was"?
Can you show me? I genuinely don't know anything about the guy.
We are still waiting for you to name ONE such county. Into the Night is supposed to provide us an example, also.IBDaMann said:
This is bogus criteria. Many counties had more votes than people who voted.
I asked you for evidence regarding this claim of yours about this guy. I know nothing about the guy, which is why I would love the opportunity to learn. If you have any evidence of this claim of yours, then please present it here. Otherwise, I'm just going to assume that you are referencing Hunter Biden every single time that you bring any variation of your claim up in the future.First, why would you believe a ghost chasing, drug addicted, lying, mentally unstable felon that sleep in the wood behind his mom's house?
Actually, the "subsidiary" Republican Party just does whatever their "holding company" (the Demonkkkrat Party) ORDERS them to do.Second, there is segment of the Republican party that have already made up their mind that the election was stolen,
Nah. The Republican Party only does as they are ORDERED by the Demonkkkrat Party.will believe most anything claimed by most anyone and it doesn't matter how unbelievable the story or they are.
There is no convincing PERIOD. The Republican Party simply does as they are ORDERED to do.There is no convincing those people because they don't want to believe anything different.
Your lies about this have already been addressed.It was claimed that there was a suitcase of ballots in Georgia. Republican observers, who were present at the time, said there was nothing nefarious going on there. It was investigated by the FBI, GBI and Georgia election officials and nothing out of the ordinary was found.
No, because MAGA supporters are not going to be gaslighted into rejecting what they have seen with their own eyes and heard with their own ears.Does that change the mind of MAGA?
Your lies about this have already been addressed.Nope, because there's always one more step down the rabbit hole. In this case, the Republican observers where were there and those doing the investigating were ALl in on the steal.
Right. Ergo, the reason why your mind is never changed. The only so-called "change" that happens to your mind is whenever your programmers decide to update your programming to be outraged about the next new "thing"..There is no changing the mind of people who can't be objective. Right.
No, the question is whether or not you can break out from your NPC programming.Anyone can claim/document anything. People who believe the earth is flat or that the moon landing was fake can document lots of stuff or anyone who will read it. The question is believability.
She didn't tell them not to verify signatures. She gave other instructions, which courts found to be illegitimate, due to the incredibly high number of ballots mailed in during Covid:DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD SHUT DOWN IN MICHIGAN
SOS for Michigan, Jocelyn Benson - democrat illegally instructed directed clerks NOT to verify signatures on mail in ballots (gee, wonder why) has lost in court and must comply with the law or face criminal prosecution.
And just like that, Michigan goes to Trump.
We are still waiting for you to name ONE such county. Into the Night is supposed to provide us an example, also.
Lots of typing. It all only confirms what I'm saying about you, IBDaMann and Into the Night. Circular thinking. Conspiracy theories. Baseless assumptions based on lies.I asked you for evidence regarding this claim of yours about this guy. I know nothing about the guy, which is why I would love the opportunity to learn. If you have any evidence of this claim of yours, then please present it here. Otherwise, I'm just going to assume that you are referencing Hunter Biden every single time that you bring any variation of your claim up in the future.
Actually, the "subsidiary" Republican Party just does whatever their "holding company" (the Demonkkkrat Party) ORDERS them to do.
Nah. The Republican Party only does as they are ORDERED by the Demonkkkrat Party.
There is no convincing PERIOD. The Republican Party simply does as they are ORDERED to do.
Your lies about this have already been addressed.
No, because MAGA supporters are not going to be gaslighted into rejecting what they have seen with their own eyes and heard with their own ears.
Your lies about this have already been addressed.
Right. Ergo, the reason why your mind is never changed. The only so-called "change" that happens to your mind is whenever your programmers decide to update your programming to be outraged about the next new "thing"..
E.g. --- Remove "COVID" chip, replace with "SLAVA UKRAINI!" chip. Remove "SLAVA UKRAINI!" chip, replace with "FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA!" chip. Etc. Etc. All the while, most goods that you purchase have already doubled in price during just a few short years of the Biden Regime...
No, the question is whether or not you can break out from your NPC programming.
They claim the evidence does exist but always seem unable to find it.They can't provide what doesn't exist.
IOW, you aren't interested in learning the truth. I'm already aware of that.Lots of typing. It all only confirms what I'm saying about you, IBDaMann and Into the Night. Circular thinking. Conspiracy theories. Baseless assumptions based on lies.
I saw what you provided. A lot of it sounds like hearsay and pretending that the past is the present.BTW, I provided details on Jesse Morgan. Thoughts? Are you still buying his story?
She didn't tell them not to verify signatures.
She gave other instructions, which courts found to be illegitimate, due to the incredibly high number of ballots mailed in during Covid:
Michigan law requires clerks to match required signatures on absentee ballot applications and absentee ballot envelopes with the voter signature on file to ensure the person submitting the ballot is the same one registered to vote in Michigan.
But state law doesn't define what it means for signatures to "agree sufficiently."
Benson on Oct. 6 instructed clerks who were matching signatures that they "must perform" their duties under the "presumption" that the signature is valid and uphold the signature's validity if there were "more matching features than nonmatching features." Whenever possible, clerks and election officials were instructed to resolve slight differences "in favor of finding that the voter's signature was valid," Murray wrote.
And, as should be expected, her direction, while not appropriate, changed nothing because it's nearly impossible to steal/forge ballots.
Michigan audit: Minimal 'duplicate,' dead voters in 2020 presidential vote
LANSING—More than 99.9 percent of all ballots in Michigan’s 2020 presidential election appear to have been legally cast and properly counted, according to a new review by the state Auditor General’s Office. The audit urges officials to address various “concerns” that would not have changed the outcome.
Out of 5.5 million Michigan ballots cast in the presidential election, auditors identified 41 potential "duplicate" votes. The Bureau of Elections referred those to Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Attorney General Dana Nessel for further investigation.
SPONSOR
Another 1,616 ballots that were counted appear to have been cast by Michigan residents who were dead on Election Day. But most of those were absentee ballots legally cast by voters who subsequently died and were not removed from the voting rolls by local clerks by Election Day, according to the audit report.
https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-g...-duplicate-dead-voters-2020-presidential-vote
The truth isn't what you're offering. You're offering conspiracy theories and baseless claims.IOW, you aren't interested in learning the truth. I'm already aware of that.
Of course it does. If it didn't, you might have to admit that yet another claim of voter fraud ended up being nothing, much like the Melissa Carone debacle, the 2000 Mules lies, vote changing satellites from Venezuela, everything Mike Lindell has ever claimed, everything Sidney Powell has ever claimed, all the BS numbers Trump claimed in Georgia, everything ever claimed about Arizona etc, etc, etc but, hey, you keep chasing those ghosts. I'm sure the actual evidence is just....... around.........................the corner.I saw what you provided. A lot of it sounds like hearsay and pretending that the past is the present.
[/QUOTE]First, why would you believe [eyewitness testimony that political oppenents have been unable to refute] ?
You don't speak for any segment of the Republican party.Second, there is segment of the Republican party
You have nothing but dispersions, and they aren't persuasive.... will believe most anything claimed by most anyone and it doesn't matter how unbelievable the story or they are.
You are now describing yourself.There is no convincing those people because they don't want to believe anything different.
This statement is in the passive voice and is thus discarded.It was claimed that there was a suitcase of ballots in Georgia.
Stick with the affidavits. All distractors are discarded.Republican observers, who were present at the time, said there was nothing nefarious going on there.
This is roughly the eighth time you have chanted this. It has been debunked. Next.It was investigated by the FBI, GBI and Georgia election officials
You have none.The question is believability.
gfm7175 is absolutely the world's single authority on gfm7175's perspective.The truth isn't what you're offering.
You are a liar. You deny that humans conspire every day. You deny the thousands of sworn affidavits.You're offering conspiracy theories and baseless claims.
Again, there were affidavits (from Republican observers) linked to the magical suitcase that refuted the conspiracy theory. Are you going to believe those affidavits or the ones you want to believe.gfm7175 is absolutely the world's single authority on gfm7175's perspective.
You are a liar. You deny that humans conspire every day. You deny the thousands of sworn affidavits.
You disparage people for observing what they observed. You have no credibility.
I am not familiar with this distractor. Do you have a link to this affidavit?Again, there were affidavits (from Republican observers) linked to the magical suitcase that refuted the conspiracy theory.
I find credible every single affidavit that I find credible. No party affiliation is part of any sworn testimony.Are you going to believe those affidavits or the ones you want to believe.
They are very valuable and we owe these witnesses a debt of gratitude for coming forward and testifying under oath.What good are affidavits from [eyewitnesses that debunk my dishonesty]?
Thousands. Ask me if I have any of my own personal observations.Do you have any affidavits from [eyewitnesses disparaged by dishonest leftists]?
The sheer volume is definitely worth noting, in light of only one being sufficient.Also the volume of affidavits is irrelevant.
Great.Whatever number there are I guarantee [totally irrelevant pivot]