REDUX: How Election Fraud Is Conducted By The Democrat/RINO (Uni)Party

[ZenMode]

Nope. You are hammering away at a false narrative. Your methodology is to "put me on trial" and seemingly obligate me prove my position in this thread, knowing that my observations are not on the internet and cannot be replicated here. You then move to "convict" for the consumption of others reading the thread.

We both believe our narrative and don't believe the other's narrative. You are trying to convince me of yours and I'm trying to convince you of mine. Stop trying to play the victim.

Also, it's pretty amusing to watch you try so hard to paint me as a Democrat / leftist. Presumably that helps you ignore what I'm saying. What is the last positive thing I've said about the Democratic party? Can you find one?

Too funny! If your slave-masters had actually allowed you to conduct independent research, I'm sure you would have actually read the affidavit. Let me quote the relevant parts:

If you're going to read it, likely for the first time, you should really read all of it.

As your portion mentioned, he sat in Harrisburg for 6 hours. He requested a slip to account for that time, but he wasn't given one because he didn't actually deliver anything. He then called his supervisor and complained before returning the trailer, and all of its contents, to the exact spot where he originally picked it up from.


Smith: So, he won't give you a slip.

Morgan: He will not give me a slip.

...........
I want to be paid for this crap.' That is exactly what I wrote. And he said, 'When you get back, just send me a text with the total hours for the day. Who is the expediter who is refusing to give you a late slip?' I said, 'That came from the transportation supervisor. He said I cannot get a late slip because they would need to unload me here, so I mean, but the same time told me to go Lancaster.'

...........

I went to Lancaster. I put the trailer at door 34. If I am moving along too fast, let me know. I put the trailer in door 34, disconnected, moved out from it. Ran inside and I gave the Harrisburg slip to the Lancaster post office. It was for Harrisburg slip I had from Bethpage. I said, 'Here you go.' I said, 'The transportation supervisor told me to drop the trailer off here to you guys. He would not give me a slip for you. So, I have the Harrisburg slip.' And it was, uh, this black gentleman there I believe he has dreads or braids. I mean, this guy, we might have said two words the whole time. He goes, 'Okay.' I walked out, got in the truck, and drove off.

Smith: The transportation supervisor. He did not give you his name or anything?

Smith: Did you see your trailer being unloaded in Lancaster?

Morgan: I didn't see anything. I pulled in door 34. Lancaster, did not see anything.

Smith: Lets talk about the trailer.

Morgan: 10R140?

Smith: That's the only one you usually have.

Morgan: That was the one that had for a month, 10R140.

Smith: And that is the one you dropped off in Lancaster.

Morgan: Yes.

Smith: So at the end of the day on October 21, 2020, you drop the truck off at Auto One You lock up You're done, you go home?

Morgan: Yes

 

[ZenMode]

False authority fallacy. They have no jurisdiction in the matter.

Right. It's not my website and I'm in no way associated with Dominion.

So what do you believe that paragraph/link is referencing if not specific printing software?

 

[ZenMode]

Special pleading fallacy. There is no specific software.

Right, you keep repeating that over and over and over. So what do you believe that paragraph is referencing?

I know you won't answer, but I like to watch you tap dance.

 

[IBDaMann]

We both believe our narrative and don't believe the other's narrative.

Oversimplification. I paid attention and observed. You, on the other hand, are being obedient to others who are telling you what false narrative to believe.

Huge difference.

You are trying to convince me of yours

Nope. That would be pointless. You must OBEY your masters; I get that. I am simply clarifying for you how stupid your arguments are.

Also, it's pretty amusing to watch you try so hard to paint me as a Democrat / leftist.

Your the one who does that. I simply point out how you support election theft.

What is the last positive thing I've said about the Democratic party?

Communists and Marxist anarchists, extreme leftists, regularly bash on the DNC. They nonetheless hate the United States and the Republic's enforcement of individual liberties. I will note, however, that you did not answer my question about how Trump is somehow not the best President ever considering only his official duties? Why did you not answer that question? Why did you pivot to answering a question that I did not ask (regarding your commentary of the DNC) ? Please answer my question about Trump.

If you're going to read it, likely for the first time, you should really read all of it.

Obviously it was not the first time I read this; I was the one who mentioned it, and I have scrutinized it several times.

... he didn't actually deliver anything.

This is a purely dishonest attempt at distraction on your part. What he did or didn't do is completely irrelevant. He is testifying as to what others did. Others loaded his truck and sent him to deliver pre-filled ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. That is all I need to know.

 

[Into the Night]

We both believe our narrative and don't believe the other's narrative. You are trying to convince me of yours and I'm trying to convince you of mine. Stop trying to play the victim.

You are hallucinating again.

Also, it's pretty amusing to watch you try so hard to paint me as a Democrat / leftist. Presumably that helps you ignore what I'm saying. What is the last positive thing I've said about the Democratic party? Can you find one?

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

Right. It's not my website and I'm in no way associated with Dominion.

Contextomy fallacy. Pivot fallacy.

So what do you believe that paragraph/link is referencing if not specific printing software?

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

Right, you keep repeating that over and over and over. So what do you believe that paragraph is referencing?

I know you won't answer, but I like to watch you tap dance.

Inversion fallacy. RQAA.

 

[ZenMode]

Oversimplification. I paid attention and observed. You, on the other hand, are being obedient to others who are telling you what false narrative to believe.

Huge difference.

paid attention and observed, but I paid attention and observed both sides of each of the claims.

Nope. That would be pointless. You must OBEY your masters; I get that. I am simply clarifying for you how stupid your arguments are.

I have no masters. This is a fairly standard error on the part of Trump supporters. IF you don't fall in line and believe the claims, then you're a shill for the Democratic party. Again, you've provided two examples of things you believe to be solid evidence, both are easily disputable. But, the game you play, whether you know it or not, is that there's always the next excuse; the next step down the rabbit hole to explain away things that are inconvenient to what you want to believe. You are certain that there was a suitcase of magical Biden ballots being taken out from under a table. When told that a) that it's not even a suitcase (suitcases don't have removable lids) and b) it was investigated by the state of Georgia, you just go deeper down the rabbit hole to "Well, they're ALL in on the steal". When I point out the the Secretary of State, Raffensperger, has been incredibly critical of Fulton county, actually tried to get people fired and has been very active is trying to prosecute voter fraud.... well, then you just skip that on your reply - not even an acknowledgement.

Your the one who does that. I simply point out how you support election theft.

You haven't shown that election theft has even happened. How many fraudulent ballots were found in Georgia. They, probably as much as any state, went to great lengths to investigate claims and found nothing. THEY had to sue True the Vote to get them to give up their "evidence". Why? Why wasn't TTV offering their evidence to every state featured in 2000 Mules? How many fraudulent ballots were found in AZ where they paid millions to do a forensic audit? At most, 35 questionable ballots were found.

When asked for more evidence, you run and hide because you can't provide it.... you just "observed" it. Where? How? What did you observe?

Communists and Marxist anarchists, extreme leftists, regularly bash on the DNC. They nonetheless hate the United States and the Republic's enforcement of individual liberties.

I bash of bad ideas and people with bad ideas. I don't broad-brush paint everyone on the right or left. Doing so is part of how you've come to your conclusions about the stolen election.

I will note, however, that you did not answer my question about how Trump is somehow not the best President ever considering only his official duties? Why did you not answer that question? Why did you pivot to answering a question that I did not ask (regarding your commentary of the DNC) ? Please answer my question about Trump.

I didn't answer the question because it's irrelevant to the current topic. It's another distraction.

Obviously it was not the first time I read this; I was the one who mentioned it, and I have scrutinized it several times.


This is a purely dishonest attempt at distraction on your part. What he did or didn't do is completely irrelevant. He is testifying as to what others did. Others loaded his truck and sent him to deliver pre-filled ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. That is all I need to know.

Let's break down the situation being described in the affidavit. First of all, the "they" you're referencing are intelligent and skilled enough to recruit people at all levels of government to go along with this plan. So, "they", whatever boogeyman you're referencing, loaded his truck with fraudulent ballots with the intent of sending ballots to another state to "steal" the state for Biden presumably, but they forgot to actually have them removed from the truck and, instead, sent him back to Lancaster. BTW, not delivering them, and making the driver wait 6 hours, only drew more attention. Why not unload them and send him on his way even if you "they" some how know, with 3 weeks remaining, that they didn't need the ballots. No, they piss off the driver by making him wait and then draw more attention by not unloading him.

Not only that, rather than concealing the ballots, so as to not draw attention, they left them exposed for not only the driver but some lady at the warehouse.

Again, these people, aka "they", are allegedly smart enough to coordinate a nationwide conspiracy to steal an election.

Additionally, don't you think that, I don't know, there's ONE Trump-hating, Dem truck drivers that they could have recruited since hiding the contents was apparently an after thought? (They really should take lessons from Georgia, where they use suitcases disguised as plastic storage bins!) Not one available Trump-hating Truck driver in 3 weeks leading up to the election when the ballots would be needed?

Does any of this make sense?

 

[ZenMode]

Contextomy fallacy. Pivot fallacy.

RQAA

The tap dancing continues....

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy. RQAA.

Well, better luck next time!

 

[Into the Night]

The tap dancing continues....

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Well, better luck next time!

Void argument fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy.

......and continues......

 

[ZenMode]

Void argument fallacy.

.......aaaaaand.......

continues.

 

[IBDaMann]

paid attention and observed, but I paid attention and observed both sides of each of the claims.

I'll repeat that I'm not buying it.

I have no masters.

I'm not buying this for a second. A rational, independently-thinking adult does not pivot and EVADE in order to keep an open mind.

This is a fairly standard error on the part of Trump supporters.

Nope. Your is a fairly standard quip to disparrage Trump supporters for not buying your insistence that they did not observe what they observed.

IF you don't fall in line and believe the claims, then you're a shill for the Democratic party.

It's the other way around, i.e. since you are a shill for the Democrat party, you pivot, EVADE, and dishonestly insist that rational Americans somehow did not observe what they observed. Your dishonesty gives you away.

You claim that you independently research, yet in the face of mountainous conclusive evidence of election theft, you absurdly insist that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Who do you think you are fooling? Answer: yourself. Further, if someone such as myself offers you one piece of said mountain of evidence, you immediately pretend that it is the only existing piece of evidence and you summarily dismiss it outright with whatever lame illogic happens to pop into your mind at the moment.

You are certain that there was a suitcase of magical Biden ballots being taken out from under a table.

I am certain that many containers of counterfeit ballots were produced an run through machines, but all I need to know is that the activity occurred. Your bogus explanations are faulty, and you would know why if you had actually paid attention when it all happened. Your mindless regurgitations of lame explanations that are intended for those who never paid attention don't work on those of us who did. Remember, I fully anticipated the election stealing and I wrote my projections here on JPP months prior to the election. In the weeks prior to the election, I was making and posting memes about election stealing, leveraging ballots without any IDs behind them. On election night, I was all eyes and ears, and when the polls closed with Trump having clearly won, I was fully paying attention when the united media made the first ever declaration that "it's just too early to call this for any candidate" and "it'll be days, maybe even weeks, before we know who won this election." It was painfully obvious to any independently thinking, rational adult that We the People were being robbed.

The DNC eventually had to broadcast the theft because Trump had garnered an historic record number of votes, i.e. the most ever garnered by any Presidential candidate (despite the massive effort to shred as many of Trump's ballots as possible in the eight swing-States in question). The election-stealers couldn't stop until Biden had an even greater record number of "votes" for a candidate for whom record few voted. Totally absurd. Not even a plausible lie.

You haven't shown that election theft has even happened.

So you're back to putting me on trial. Good luck with that. You haven't refuted any aspect of the election theft.

I didn't answer the question because it's irrelevant to the current topic.

Nope. You made it a centerpiece. You were trying to EVADE the scrutiny of your claims that you somehow consider all evidence with an open mind. You tried to paint yourself as neutral and unbiased, performing independent research and weighing all sides of the issue. I wish to reveal that you do not have any sort of open mind, that you will only push your dishonest political agenda of supporting election theft and HATRED of Trump. My question gets to the heart of this, and your refusal to answer is my Exhibit A. To hammer the final nail in this coffin, I need you to clearly avoid answering this question, ergo I am officiall requesting that you answer my question about Trump being the best US President ever.
Yes, Exhibit A is a bitch.

Let's break down the situation being described in the affidavit.

No. Let's not. I assure you, reading it once was enough, and I know how to read. Nonetheless, I ended up scrutinizing it many times since the testimony was given. I don't need to read it anymore. I will, however, take the opportunity to note that you have dishonestly pivoted from 1. stating that there is no evidence whatsoever, to 2. claiming that this trucker did not transport ballots across State lines, to 3. arguing that he didn't actually end up delivering the ballots. Obviously there is no honest, rational discussion to be had with you. You are locked down in ZenRegurgitateMode.

 

[Into the Night]

.......aaaaaand.......

continues.

Why do you continue? You can stop your fallacies anytime.

 

[ZenMode]

Why do you continue? You can stop your fallacies anytime.

You can stop using claims of fallacies to avoid actually answering questions anytime.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Dear lord. What an idiotic thread. What was it Wingnuts were saying after the 2000 election? Sore Loserman.

Every time you ask these cerebrally impaired individuals to provide evidence they either don’t or they dream up some fanciful conspiracy theory or just plain make shit up.

Are y’all just jealous that, unlike you the majority of Americans like democracy and are unable to adapt to changes? Can’t you accept that in a Democracy you don’t always win? Why do you hate the legacy of the greatest generation who destroyed fascism just to have their uneducated grand kids embrace it? Why do you hate democracy so much that you have enthusiastically embraced a fascist like Trump. Why do you hate America and what it stands for? You do realize our nations motto is E. Pluribus Unum and not E. Pluribus Redneck?

 

[ZenMode]

I'll repeat that I'm not buying it.

To avoid a 10k word essay, I'm only responding to the first two items for now

You're not buying that I paid attention to both sides of the claims? Why? Do you believe that you did pay attention and I'm just way off?

- Were you aware that Georgia sued True the Vote to force them to turn over their evidence of ballot harvesting because TTV refused to turn it over voluntarily?

- Were you aware that the trucker didn't deliver any ballots to Harrisburg and that they were returned to where he got them?

- Were you aware that Georgia investigated the voter fraud numbers that Trump referenced when he called Georgia and publicly refuted all of them?

- Were you aware that the Georgia Secretary of State, who you've claimed was in on the stealing of Georgia, had publicly criticized Fulton county for their inability to get their shit together and run elections correctly?

- Were you aware that Raffensperger, who's allegedly in on the steal called for the firing of Fulton County election officials?
- Were you aware that Raffensperger considered having the state take over the running of elections because Fulton County couldn't get their shit together?

-Were you aware that the Georgia Board of Elections announced the punishment for Fulton County?

That's just ONE state.

Were you aware that individual state courts ruled on the constitutionality of some of the changes made during Covid and ruled that the changes were made illegally or were illegal in themselves? Did you know that happened in the largely liberal state of Michigan?

Did you watch the 4 hour finally when Cyber Ninjas reviewed their findings with the AZ Senate and, despite their claims of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent/illegal ballots, ultimately found about 35 that needed further review?

So, please explain what you are not buying and what, of what I mentioned above, were you aware of before I brought them up.[/QUOTE]


I'm not buying this for a second. A rational, independently-thinking adult does not pivot and EVADE in order to keep an open mind. [/QUOTE]

I haven't evaded anything other than your unrelated question about ranking Trump as President.

And what have I pivoted on? Is it bad to be open to the possibility of a mass voter fraud conspiracy and then, as more information comes out and things just don't make sense, change my views?

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Of all the discussions that were happening and lost, I think the discussion about the 2020 "stolen" election is worth continuing.

Conversation #1:







That's right. You're the person who believes they can make things true just be saying (repeating) them.

No specific software? Do you think they use a Microsoft Word template?

Took me all of 60 seconds to find this. The obvious question is why you wouldn't , with the circus surrounding the 2020 election and Dominion, look into this yourself?

FYI, "application" is software.

MOBILE BALLOT PRINTING
Easily print ballots whenever and wherever needed with Dominion’s Mobile Ballot Printing application. Fully integrated with Democracy Suite®, ballots print with all appropriate colors and security watermarks. Mobile Ballot Printing features a user-friendly interface, audit reports tracking print count for each ballot type and compatibility with a variety of printers to meet the volume needs of any jurisdiction.

This product is not currently part of U.S. EAC certification. Availability may be subject to state certification.

Optional Solutions - Dominion Voting Systems

Optional Solutions ImageCast® Adjudication Dominion’s ImageCast® Adjudication delivers an efficient, auditable process for ballots that meet customizable outstack conditions based on jurisdictional needs. Outstacked ballots can be automatically routed to adjudication stations, where election...

www.dominionvoting.com

[/QUOTE]
it means the software is not checked or verified by any government authority.

its just.... whatever.