REDUX: How Election Fraud Is Conducted By The Democrat/RINO (Uni)Party

[Truck Fump / h1b]

When there is an investigation by the FBI or, in this case, GBI or any state investigators, when do you ever hear names of actual investigators released?

So, in the case of Georgia:

The investigation, which included Secretary of State Investigators, and Special Agents with both GBI and FBI revealed “there was no evidence of any type of fraud as alleged.” Through the course of the investigation, “three law enforcement agencies reviewed the entire unedited video footage of the events in question.......

What would having names change?

rubber stamp bullshit.

you know this.

I would like to know the methodologies they employed to determine the results.

and I would like to know if they considered the overarching illegality of elections conducted with unconstitutional rules.

 

[ZenMode]

rubber stamp bullshit.

you know this.

I really don't know this.

I would like to know the methodologies they employed to determine the results.

and I would like to know if they considered the overarching illegality of elections conducted with unconstitutional rules.

In the case of the magical suitcase of Biden ballots, where you have multiple investigative bodies and law enforcement agencies watching a video of events, interviewing people, looking at evidence, etc what would you need to know for you to consider that investigation to be legitimate?

 

[ZenMode]

The protocol was not followed, moron.

Based on what?

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

I really don't know this.



In the case of the magical suitcase of Biden ballots, where you have multiple investigative bodies and law enforcement agencies watching a video of events, interviewing people, looking at evidence, etc what would you need to know for you to consider that investigation to be legitimate?

so no names, no actual report then. ok.

 

[ZenMode]

so no names, no actual report then. ok.

Why? In my home state of Arizona, there is a huge investigation going on into a group of kids called the Gilbert Goons. I've seen the chief of police and other leadership from the police department speak on TV, but have absolutely no clue of the names of the police officers or detectives who are doing the on-the-ground work. Should I assume it's all a big lie?

 

[IBDaMann]

The state of Georgia investigated claims extensively.

Nope. The State of Georgia spin-doctored and CYA'ed. The State of Georgia wasn't going to investigate itself.

 

[IBDaMann]

What did you see when you were paying attention

Too much to list here. I have written much on this, though, in various other posts. I hope you were paying attention; if not, you can find them and re-read.

Get back to the affidavits. You haven't refuted any of them. You tried to refute one by diverting focus away from the testimony of the observation of the criminal conspiracy to perpetrate massive voter fraud that was occurring ... and direct attention to the irrelevant point of the driver not having delivered the ballots. Fail.

You have a few thousand more. Pick the next one you wish to address, post it and let's discuss.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. The State of Georgia spin-doctored and CYA'ed. The State of Georgia wasn't going to investigate itself.

Based on what do you claim this?

 

[ZenMode]

Too much to list here. I have written much on this, though, in various other posts. I hope you were paying attention; if not, you can find them and re-read.

Get back to the affidavits. You haven't refuted any of them. You tried to refute one by diverting focus away from the testimony of the observation of the criminal conspiracy to perpetrate massive voter fraud that was occurring ... and direct attention to the irrelevant point of the driver not having delivered the ballots. Fail.

You have a few thousand more. Pick the next one you wish to address, post it and let's discuss.

Just so we're clear, you didn't witness any of the events described in the affidavits, right? You apparently didn't even READ the truck driver affidavit in its entirety if at all, yet you blindly assume they are all factual. Why?

Without the driver delivering the ballots, what do you have besides assumptions about intent?

Also, (another item you glossed over) does it not matter that "they", the Boogeyman you so fear, didn't disguise what was being transported but left them exposed for anyone to see? Does that sound like the actions of a criminal mastermind organization that is executing a nationwide plan to steal an election.

Does it matter that, in the process of recruiting for this master plan, nobody thought to recruit a truck driver who was in on it?

I'll leave it to you to pick the affidavit or topic to discuss. Anything I licked would surely be assume to have nefarious intent Because, you know, my masters.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Why? In my home state of Arizona, there is a huge investigation going on into a group of kids called the Gilbert Goons. I've seen the chief of police and other leadership from the police department speak on TV, but have absolutely no clue of the names of the police officers or detectives who are doing the on-the-ground work. Should I assume it's all a big lie?

don't change the topic.

 

[Into the Night]

I really don't know this.

Blatant lie.

In the case of the magical suitcase of Biden ballots, where you have multiple investigative bodies and law enforcement agencies watching a video of events, interviewing people, looking at evidence, etc what would you need to know for you to consider that investigation to be legitimate?

Void authority fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Based on what?

Trying to deny your own post again?

 

[Into the Night]

Why? In my home state of Arizona, there is a huge investigation going on into a group of kids called the Gilbert Goons. I've seen the chief of police and other leadership from the police department speak on TV, but have absolutely no clue of the names of the police officers or detectives who are doing the on-the-ground work. Should I assume it's all a big lie?

Pivot fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Based on what do you claim this?

Trying to deny your own posts won't work, moron.

 

[Into the Night]

Just so we're clear, you didn't witness any of the events described in the affidavits, right? You apparently didn't even READ the truck driver affidavit in its entirety if at all, yet you blindly assume they are all factual. Why?

Without the driver delivering the ballots, what do you have besides assumptions about intent?

Also, (another item you glossed over) does it not matter that "they", the Boogeyman you so fear, didn't disguise what was being transported but left them exposed for anyone to see? Does that sound like the actions of a criminal mastermind organization that is executing a nationwide plan to steal an election.

Does it matter that, in the process of recruiting for this master plan, nobody thought to recruit a truck driver who was in on it?

I'll leave it to you to pick the affidavit or topic to discuss. Anything I licked would surely be assume to have nefarious intent Because, you know, my masters.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, moron.

 

[ZenMode]

Argument of the Stone fallacy. You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, moron.

You took the time to create 5 responses and not one means anything. Just empty blathering.

Let me know when you actually have something meaningful to say.

 

[Into the Night]

You took the time to create 5 responses and not one means anything. Just empty blathering and trolling.

You are describing yourself again. You cannot project YOUR problems on anybody else, moron.

 

[ZenMode]

You are describing yourself again. You cannot project YOUR problems on anybody else, moron.

Make that 6 posts....

 

[ZenMode]

don't change the topic.

Consider it me asking if I'm correctly applying your approach.

 

[IBDaMann]

Based on what do you claim this?

Based on everything I've written thus far, including everything you claim you haven't read or somehow missed.