ZenMode
Well-known member
Thanks?An affidavit is not mathematics.
Aaaaaand, the tap dancing/trolling has officially begun.RQAA. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Thanks?An affidavit is not mathematics.
Aaaaaand, the tap dancing/trolling has officially begun.RQAA. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
RQAA. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
You can't make go away that which hasn't been made to appear.Argument of the Stone fallacy. You can't make it go away like that either.
Paper ballots are not votes. You can print a billion of them if you want to, but it is a waste of money. Someone has to use them to vote. That voter has to go to a precinct that has his name in their log book and vote. You all must get mail showing what precinct you are assigned to. Once he passes that procedure, he is allowed to vote . Then his name is marked as voted. Votes turned in that are not in the precinct book are not counted and authorities are called. It is a simple system that obviously will not allow over -votes. I have read about people who say they did not get info about a precinct change and went to the wrong precinct to vote. They're told they cannot vote and they should go to the proper precinct. If there is no time, they can fill out a provisional ballot and obtain permission for it to count, after proving to the commission that they did not get the mail changing the precinct.There was no math shown on the affidavit. There were also no examples (peoples' names) provided.
Math is meaningless if you're using the wrong numbers. I can stand on one side of a Ford Mustang, add 1 rear tire to 1 front tire and get 2. Even though that math was done correctly, would I be correct to conclude that a Ford Mustang only has 2 tires? Obviously not.
i'm absolutely certain that Cyber Ninjas did technically correct math when they subtracted the number of mail-in ballots they thought were sent out from the number of "mail-in" ballots they thought were received and got 74,243. The math wasn't the issue, it was using the wrong numbers because they were ignorant of what they were looking at.
The 2022 AZ election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats, mostly through disenfranchisement in select precincts.You shouldn't be surprised. I already said you could pick.
Remember when Cyber Ninjas claimed, among other things, there were 74k more mail-in ballots received than there was sent out, 4k voters registered after the deadline and 18k removed from the voter rolls after the election and they claimed these things because they didn't understand what they were looking at when doing the audit?
I'm not saying he doesn't believe what he's saying. I'm sure Cyber Ninjas believed what they were claiming , as well. He very likely does believe what he is claiming and that's all an affidavit says - I swear I really believe XXXX to be true.
Other than telling you what you want to believe, why would to take what he's saying as absolute fact when Georgia refuted these claims?
I think we both know the answer to that question. As I said in another post, which was again ignored, you have loaded the dice. You've made up your mind that Trump won and Dems stole the election, so anyone who says otherwise is part of the steal. It wouldn't matter if the FBI did a full investigation of every claim made on an affidavit and released every name of every agent doing the investigating . If they didn't find that the election was stolen, they'd be written off as part of the those who stole it.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.You can't make go away that which hasn't been made to appear.
When filled out and submitted, they certainly are!Paper ballots are not votes.
Election workers filled them out and submitted them multiple times.You can print a billion of them if you want to, but it is a waste of money. Someone has to use them to vote.
Fake votes have no precinct. They are fake.That voter has to go to a precinct that has his name in their log book and vote.
Call it whatever you want, very little, if any, evidence has been provided. Nothing close to sufficient evidence of what you all believe happened.Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Link?Election workers filled them out and submitted them multiple times.
Liz Cheney, Bill Barr, Chris Krebbs, Mike Pence, etc, none of them "libtards" have all accepted the 2020 election results. trumptard fucks like you keep up with the pathetic gaslighting. Biden won, fair and square. You have zero evidence there was fraud. Why? There wasn't any.Wrong tense. The video shows exactly what I see it showing. Let me watch it again. Yep, it shows it.
We've been over this. You still don't know what "evidence" means.
What else are you currently deluding yourself into denying?
Yes, they did. They created several slates of fake electors and forged certifications. Several have been indicted because of it.Nope. The DNC is who depends on it. Conservatives had absolutely nothing to do with the stolen 2020 election.
Fucking trumptard horseshit. You fucking lost because you're pathetic.Debunked. Fox's "admission" was arranged and complete financial reimbursement was coordinated with the DNC. Check Fox's financials.
Oh! <hand up> I know!... yet you won't find anything presented to you to be "meaningful".
Ask me how I know.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. You can't make the evidence just disappear, moron.Call it whatever you want, very little, if any, evidence has been provided. Nothing close to sufficient evidence of what you all believe happened.
RQAA.Link?
There was no 2020 election results. Argument of the Stone fallacy. You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear.Liz Cheney, Bill Barr, Chris Krebbs, Mike Pence, etc, none of them "libtards" have all accepted the 2020 election results. trumptard fucks like you keep up with the pathetic gaslighting. Biden won, fair and square. You have zero evidence there was fraud. Why? There wasn't any.
The Democrat party is a conspiracy.Oh! <hand up> I know!
Because it only exists in the sick, conspiratorial mind of the trumptard cult!
We should dedicate a thread to the political affiliation of these RINOs. However, nothing that any Trump-HATER says can possibly carry more weight with me than my own observations. Of course all the TDS-afflicted in the world are going to "accept" the stealing of an election against Trump.Liz Cheney, Bill Barr, Chris Krebbs, Mike Pence, etc, none of them "libtards" have all accepted the 2020 election results.
TDS-afflicted liars such as you will never join the rest of us in reality. It would be great if you would all just fuck off and go live in your safe spaces and stop trying to tax the shit out of the rest of us so that you can all play Climate superheroes. Barring that, you can say that we don't appreciate you destroying the republic and stealing elections just so you can OBEY your slave-masters at the DNC.trumptard fucks like you keep up with the pathetic gaslighting.
He couldn't get more than four people to show up for a rally. Above that, people had to be bused in. Nobody voted for him.Biden won, fair and square.
Incorrect. You have not refuted any of the mountain of evidence. Start with the affidavits that have been discussed here on JPP. They are only two of thousands. Then you can address my observations which I also posted here on JPP, which align with my election-stealing predictions that I posted on JPP months before the election and that were carried out exactly as anticipated.You have zero evidence there was fraud.
You can't make disappear that which doesn't exist.Argument of the Stone fallacy. You can't make the evidence just disappear, moron.
Nope.RQAA.
Yes, yes, anyone who doesn't subscribe to the hysterical nazi trumptard propaganda is a "RINO". So fucking tiresome. Aren't you getting tired of being a fucking nutjob?We should dedicate a thread to the political affiliation of these RINOs.