Into the Night
Verified User
Argument of the Stone fallacy.You can't make disappear that which doesn't exist.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.You can't make disappear that which doesn't exist.
RQAA.Nope.
Where is the video of this? Almost all states have live video of people processing ballots.
Insults don't win arguments, moron.Yes, yes, anyone who doesn't subscribe to the hysterical nazi trumptard propaganda is a "RINO". So fucking tiresome. Aren't you getting tired of being a fucking nutjob?
Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their complete lack of any education. Nazis are socialists/leftists, not conservatives. Educated people know this. Leftists are uneducated, and are thus gullible, and have been ordered by their slave masters to believe that conservatives are socialists ... and leftists OBEY.Yes, yes, anyone who doesn't subscribe to the hysterical nazi trumptard propaganda is a "RINO".
Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their complete lack of any education. Nazis are socialists/leftists, not conservatives. Educated people know this. Leftists are uneducated, and are thus gullible, and have been ordered by their slave masters to believe that conservatives are socialists ... and leftists OBEY.
Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their inability to spot a RINO.
How many ballots were filled out by poll workers? How many were scanned multiples?RQAA.
Really? When why are they roaming around CPAC? Why does the fat orange king dine with them at his shitty country club?Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their complete lack of any education. Nazis are socialists/leftists, not conservatives.
Fascism is a form of socialism. It is not 'far right'. It is supported by DEMOCRATS. It is what you want!If by "Educated people" you mean people who receive their education through learned texts and scholars as compared to immersing themselves in political websites, they know Nazism is fascism, a far Right ideology.
Argument from randU fallacy. Quoting made up numbers won't work.How many ballots were filled out by poll workers? How many were scanned multiples?
I can tell YOU location and number of double scanned ballots for an event that actually happened and wasn't people chasing conspiracy theories.
Location: Georgia
Number: ~200
Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount
Almost 200 duplicate found when ballot images made public
Search for election fraud in Georgia finds 200 ballots scanned twice
Nearly 200 absentee ballots were scanned twice during Fulton County's initial count of the 2020 presidential election, according to digital ballot images. A recount in early December resulted in Republican Donald Trump regaining 121 absentee votes in Fulton, but Democrat Joe Biden won Georgia by...www.ajc.com
Non-sequitur fallacy.Really? When why are they roaming around CPAC? Why does the fat orange king dine with them at his shitty country club?
Educated people know this!
The best part of your dishonesty/insanity is that, quite literally, all you have is made up numbers. I mean, somebody went through pictures of ballots, one picture at a time, and found which ones had been scanned twice. You call those made up numbers, but you are all in on the randomly generated numbers from some CPA, somewhere in the country?Argument from randU fallacy. Quoting made up numbers won't work.
You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. You are making shit up. Your desperation to ignore the evidence is obvious. You can't make it disappear, dude.The best part of your dishonesty/insanity is that, quite literally, all you have is made up numbers. I mean, somebody went through pictures of ballots, one picture at a time, and found which ones had been scanned twice. You call those made up numbers, but you are all in on the randomly generated numbers from some CPA, somewhere in the country?
How do you even function in life?
Almost forgot... I'm not trying to make evidence disappear. You are unable to make evidence appear.
Nope. You are ignoring sworn testimony without refuting it. The number of fraudulent ballots in Georgia is at least 500,000 and could be in the millions. You know this and refuse to be honest.I can tell YOU location and number of double scanned ballots for an event that actually happened and wasn't people chasing conspiracy theories.
The funny thing is that you are a very skilled troll. You sprinkle in just enough normal responses and legit points to keep me wondering....and responding.Argument of the Stone fallacy. You are making shit up. Your desperation to ignore the evidence is obvious. You can't make it disappear, dude.
Sworn testimony only means that somebody thinks they witness something.Nope. You are ignoring sworn testimony without refuting it. The number of fraudulent ballots in Georgia is at least 500,000 and could be in the millions. You know this and refuse to be honest.
Who are "they"?Really? When why are they roaming around CPAC?
Who are "them"?Why does the fat orange king dine with them at his shitty country club?
Educated people know to use antecedents.Educated people know this!
You should find an orderly in your institution and have them help you interpret this:Who are "they"?
Who are "them"?
Educated people know to use antecedents.
NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Nazis appeared to find a friendly reception at the Conservative Political Action Conference this year.
Throughout the conference, racist extremists, some of whom had secured official CPAC badges, openly mingled with conference attendees and espoused antisemitic conspiracy theories.
The presence of these individuals has been a persistent issue at CPAC. In previous years, conference organizers have ejected well-known Nazis and white supremacists such as Nick Fuentes.
Incorrect. You need to refute it. You haven't refuted it.Sworn testimony only means that somebody thinks they witness something.
The onus on the observer is to report what was observed.The onus is on the person making the claim to prove their claim.
It is your job to refute every single thing that debunks your claim. The onus is on you to support your claim.It's not my job to refute every crazy thing that somebody believes.
You should find a therapist to help you with your gullibility. You still haven't identified anyone you were calling "them" or "they."You should find an orderly in your institution and have them help you interpret this:
Lol ... The guy in Georgia that found the 200 ballots that were scanned twice had actual solid evidence of what he was claiming. A person could try to refute that by, for example, finding differences in the two ballots that you was claiming were scanned twice.Incorrect. You need to refute it. You haven't refuted it.
The onus on the observer is to report what was observed.
I am the one drawing the conclusion and I am not on trial.
It is your job to refute every single thing that debunks your claim. The onus is on you to support your claim.