Remember how outraged Damocles (and others) were?

Lies??????? FACT! Hillary used an unauthorized email server that had up to TOP SECRET SAR on it. Confirmed by the FBI and State Dept. That alone is sufficient evidence to put most people in jail. You are just like the Trump lovers in that you don't believe she would do anything illegal.
I honestly believe you could witness her push an old person in front of a bus with your own eyes but claim it wasn't her!

They'd say the old person deserved it or that Hillary was justified in some way. Two rules. LOL
 
They found nothing materially new. But the announcement that they were looking cost Hillary the election. It is what it is.

Except evidence Hillary lied when she said those were "personal emails" and that she didn't delete official emails.
 
Do I believe you or my lying eyes? I saw the testimony citing the server findings before congress under oath.
You say my last sentence was an insult. Well is an insult also so your fuck you is back at you.
No, it’s not the same, you stated I would watch someone being killed and do nothing about it. It a little bit more of an insult then saying you deny facts. So the fuck you is back in your court.
 
No. In fact is seems petty just like when Earl did it leaving me line of red.

Do you have the quote of Comey saying "there was no crime"? You quoted The Guardian saying it.

This is, in fact what he said: https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.


Notice the specific wording. He's not saying she's innocent, only that there isn't enough there to prosecute. Also this statement was before everyone knew Hillary lied about not destroying evidence. They gave her the benefit of the doubt that it wasn't intentional. Who made that call? The DOJ.

Note the red; that means if it had been you or me, we'd be in trouble....but isn't what they were deciding. LOL
Well, that’s me, petty, but when you misrepresent facts, I’m going to groan you.
 
DUDE!
She was fully investigated by a fucking Republican who was appointed by a Republican and the report said there was nothing to it but being stupid about technology
OJ and Zimmeran are 100% not guilty and Trump was impeached twice, but "there was nothing to it."

Hillary claiming she didn't know how to work her Blackberry is a hoot!

a-viral-photo-of-hillary-clinton-checking-her-blackberry-led-53201414.png
https://mashable.com/article/hillary-clinton-meme-photo-led-to-email-questions-blackberry
Hillary Clinton's Blackberry meme led to initial questions about her email
State Department open records staffers under Hillary Clinton reportedly didn't have a clue that the then-secretary of state used email until a picture of her staring down at a Blackberry -- shades on -- went viral.
 
Remember how outraged Damocles and the Trumppers were when Hillary received top secret emails on a server?
I remember how Damocles was upset and opined that had he done that he would have been sent to jail.
Now Trump is found to have have boxes containing top secret documents at Mar-A-Lago.... Not a peep from any of them!
Rules for thee but not for Republicans.

That's some funny deflections there liar.

There's a VAST difference in using a private server and phone to conduct the people's business, a direct violation of US code, and Trump having documents at his protected residence that was used as his second White House.

This is, once again, the shrill poutage and outrage we saw from hypocrites like Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi and Jerry Nadler over Ukraine, Russian Collusion and their buffoonish, failed attempts to impeach a President just because they didn't like him.

It is painfully obvious that what Democrats claim of their political opponents, they ARE.
:palm:
 
1) I never read that she forwarded those emails, is that true?

2) There is no proof what emails she deleted, an I wrong?

Wrong on both counts, dumbass. This isn't your day, is it?

She forwarded to Huma and Somehow Anthony had them too, and she deleted them off of her own machine which was evident by the ones found on Huma and Anthony's computers.
 
Well, that’s me, petty, but when you misrepresent facts, I’m going to groan you.

The facts are correct. You're buying the spin because you're a Hillaryite just like Trumpers point to Trump's impeachments as Democrats gone wild without any facts. Trump, like Hillary, hasn't been convicted of anything. Just like OJ on his wife's murder. Or Zimmerman, another groanfest from you. LOL

The clearheaded can see Hillary and her husband had a long, long history of skirting just inside the law. Running up to the ethical line and then walking along it. IMO, that's dishonest. This was known in the 90s after Whitewater, Travelgate, the Lincoln bedroom, covering up Bill's philandering, etc. All completely legal...mostly.

That said, would you want one of your kids to date a person who habitually pushed the ethical limits? Seriously. No need to answer, but if the answer is a firm "NO", then you would understand why I don't trust the Clintons, the Trumps or anyone like them.
 
So why wasn't she prosecuted if she committed illegal act(s)?

The same reason why Trump isn't hanging from a tree on the White House lawn for treason; Washington DC is a cesspool of liars, thieves, perverts and conmen. Both sides support corruption when it suits them. The reason they can do it is because people like you, Phan and all the Hillary and Trump lovers allow it. You chose to vote for the lesser evil and you ended up with evil. Go figure. LOL

When We, the People, freely elect known liars, thieves, perverts and conmen to national office, then we are living out Joseph de Maistre's famous saying and getting the government we deserve; a corrupt government of known liars, thieves, perverts and conmen.
 
No, it’s not the same, you stated I would watch someone being killed and do nothing about it. It a little bit more of an insult then saying you deny facts. So the fuck you is back in your court.

The above is one of things I like about you Phan. You are a fiesty old broad. LOL let me guess that is an insult also. Lol
 
Last edited:
Wrong on both counts, dumbass. This isn't your day, is it?

She forwarded to Huma and Somehow Anthony had them too, and she deleted them off of her own machine which was evident by the ones found on Huma and Anthony's computers.

Anthony Weiner was the seven term NY 9th District Representative. Husbands and wives share things. The FBI determined that Huma didn't know the emails she forwarded contained classified info because Hillary didn't tell her it was in the email.

Most civilians don't get that violating classified material protocols is a BFD. Huge. People have gone to prison for it and not just the ones selling it. Chelsea Manning is one of the more famous examples. Hillary? It was an election year and Hillary was the DNC's nominee so she didn't even get a wrist slap. For what she did, she deserved a censure....but it was an election year...and she'd bought her slot as the nominee. Ask a Bernie fan if you don't believe me. LOL


Anyone want to bet that when a Republican is caught doing this, such as Trump or some lesser being, that the Democrats won't be all up in arms about it?
 
Okay, so HRC and Trump are equally culpable... Where is their outrage?

ROFL!!!! You can't be serious. YOU were one of those claiming hillary did nothing wrong because comey used careless instead of negligent, therefore she didn't break the law........and NOW you want outrage because trump was found with classified documents????? are you the standard level of insane that is required to be a liberal or are you extra insane?
 
Wrong on both counts, dumbass. This isn't your day, is it?

She forwarded to Huma and Somehow Anthony had them too, and she deleted them off of her own machine which was evident by the ones found on Huma and Anthony's computers.

Citation?
 
You dont think Trump is likely to run again? Where is your outrage like you had with HRC? I know you are not a Trump fan, but you love making up excuses for him while attacking HRC, who you hate without justification.

HRC was Secretary of State. You dont assume she had protections for the top secret information? If top secret papers were found at her home, you would have FREAKED, and had she been president and retroactively declassified those papers you would have been out of control.

If HillBillary was President and had the information in a SCIF at the house I would not have been as outraged. Maybe even not at all. The reality is: My house, and HillBillary's house also, did not and do not have a SCIF, while the President's home away from the WH does. Information can go inside a SCIF at Mar-A-Lago in a way that could not be possible at Funk and Wagnell's basement bathroom where HillBillary had her entirely unprotected server.

If we find out that Trump just brought them home and left them in a hallway I'll be right there with you, as outraged as I was when I found out that HillBillary put them on a totally unprotected server, outside a SCIF, in no way protected, even as much as Hotmail protects their servers... at this point we don't even know if any of the information was ever exposed to anyone at all, unlike HillBillary's server.
 
If HillBillary was President and had the information in a SCIF at the house I would not have been as outraged. Maybe even not at all. The reality is: My house, and HillBillary's house also, did not and do not have a SCIF, while the President's home away from the WH does. Information can go inside a SCIF at Mar-A-Lago in a way that could not be possible at Funk and Wagnell's basement bathroom where HillBillary had her server.

If we find out that Trump just brought them home and left them in a hallway I'll be right there with you, as outraged as I was when I found out that HillBillary put them on a totally unprotected server, outside a SCIF, in no way protected, even as much as Hotmail protects their servers... at this point we don't even know if any of the information was ever exposed to anyone at all, unlike HillBillary's server.

If you say so. We will never get that information so you are safe.
 
Last edited:
If you say so. We will never get that information so you are safe.

You don't think Biden would tell you? That's not on me. Whether I am "safe" or not is moot. I didn't take information from anywhere, because I don't like prison and I handled it appropriately.

You seem to have me confused with somebody who likes Trump.
 
And Trump got Russian aid in the election

Agreed here. Putin's advances in hacking and influence on the Internet is the 21st Century equivalence of Sputnik. He should always be known for putting this shit together....like Hitler for V-2 rockets and jets.

IMO, the Democrats typically overplayed their hand and claimed a direct agreement between Trump and Putin rather than the more obvious fact that Putin used the old adage about useful idiots. He sees Trump as a fool who can be bought for money, within most of the limits of the law and with legal buffers. When no direct link was found, as usual, the Democrats look like overzealous idiots with Trump Derangement Syndrome...or so believe over 74,000,000 Americans. The JPP members who were among the over 81,000,000 Americans who voted for Biden love to demean the other 74M rather than find a solution to this division. Sad.
 
You don't think Biden would tell you? That's not on me. Whether I am "safe" or not is moot. I didn't take information from anywhere, because I don't like prison and I handled it appropriately.

You seem to have me confused with somebody who likes Trump.

If someone sends you top secret documents, you can’t prevent it.
 
Back
Top