No. In fact is seems petty just like when Earl did it leaving me line of red.
Do you have the quote of Comey saying "there was no crime"? You quoted The Guardian saying it.
This is, in fact what he said:
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
Notice the specific wording. He's not saying she's innocent, only that there isn't enough there to prosecute. Also this statement was before everyone knew Hillary lied about not destroying evidence. They gave her the benefit of the doubt that it wasn't intentional. Who made that call? The DOJ.
Note the red; that means if it had been you or me, we'd be in trouble....but isn't what they were deciding. LOL