๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜€๐˜† ๐—๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜€.

The wife was out of the car , busy harassing.... And then eventually giving the directive that turned into a death sentence....
 
In every case, they were on foot and were not doing something that violated the law. That doesn't show anyone owning the police or authorities, but simply exercising their rights fully.
yes.
and I'm sure you feel bad about besmirching 1st amendment auditors.

they are heros illustrating how to assert rights in the face of ignorant retarded LE thugs. and there are some.
 
I think you'd be hard pressed to find a sovereign citizen type that is or was successful in court or versus authorities.

Nope. That rarely, if ever, happens. Instead, the stupidity of the sovereign citizen escalates as their bullshit fails, and they end up being hauled to jail and slapped with additional charges.
So you are denying they exist at all?

And again i did not limit it to sovereign citizens, even though i have seen examples of some claiming that, who have succeeded. My point is you have police doing over reach and the person refusing to comply and the citizen being proven right.

You are taking a view that seems to say cops are 100% correct and resisting their authority should never be done and if done, is wrong by default.


Do you stand by your view and also your claim i cannot find a single example?
 
Back
Top