Ron Paul/FP.com Flashback Pop Quiz

uscitizen said:
right just look in the mirror sometimes Damo :)

You most common method is by empahsising one point of an issue and ignoring the rest.

We all do that from time to time. And this statement is not linked to Darla's current dispute with you.
Click to expand...
And I can usually admit when I have been disingenuous. Usually when I argue a certain point within an argument it is because it is the weakest link of the argument, the thread that when pulled causes it all to fall apart. Sometimes I am just curious about the statement itself.

Most of the time I am questioning my own beliefs at the same time as seeking answers from another.
 
Darla said:
Well, why should you have to "search" for it, when you claimed that I consistently say this?

That I "always" use this "excuse"?

I don't know, I wouldn't think it'd be much of a search. I mean, you shouldn't have to call in the coast guard or anything.
Click to expand...
Right, "always" wasn't in there. I asked if you get tired of it. Consistently is not "always". But, I'd still have to search for it if you asked me the last time I used the word disingenuous in a thread other than this one too.
 
I just have to ask this.
Are/were any of the ron paul supporters on the security commission or what ever it is called on FP ?
 
Damocles said:
He didn't say it because you are a girl, that is weak. Do you ever get tired of using that excuse?

He would say it to anybody just simply taking his word regardless of their sex.
Click to expand...

There are more people here than Darla that agree with me on a variety of issues. I've never heard anyone challenged on it BUT Darla. In fact, I've responded to this before.

I ask you, what makes him or you think that because she agrees with me on a particular issue, she wasn't smart enough to analyze this for herself?

Why not ask that of USCitizen, who also agrees?
 
Damocles said:
Right, "always" wasn't in there. I asked if you get tired of it. Consistently is not "always". But, I'd still have to search for it if you asked me the last time I used the word disingenuous in a thread other than this one too.
Click to expand...

You're being a pisspot for some reason today, and I can usually ignore it, but it is pissing me off for this reason.

The FP board was a sexist board in many ways. I can't count the number of times I was called a c*nt on that board, just for starters. A lot of the little boys posting on there were sexists. And I am the only one who has been singled out on this board for fucking agreeing with someone. And I damned well will point out sexist behavior without being scolded for it by you daddy.

You jumped to demean me on this thread by trying to imply that I am some crazy feminazi who is always screaming sexist, when in fact, unless I am flirting with someone, my gender rarely comes up on this board.

And I'm annoyed enough where I really don't want to talk to you for the rest of the day, so that I don't say anything I'll regret, because normally I quite like you.
 
blackascoal said:
There are more people here than Darla that agree with me on a variety of issues. I've never heard anyone challenged on it BUT Darla. In fact, I've responded to this before.

I ask you, what makes him or you think that because she agrees with me on a particular issue, she wasn't smart enough to analyze this for herself?

Why not ask that of USCitizen, who also agrees?
Click to expand...

Thank you, I am very glad that someone else noticed it.
 
BAC is a bit more left than myself, but I agree with him on most issues.
He also does make good clear arguments and does accept that others believe differently.
 
blackascoal said:
There are more people here than Darla that agree with me on a variety of issues. I've never heard anyone challenged on it BUT Darla. In fact, I've responded to this before.

I ask you, what makes him or you think that because she agrees with me on a particular issue, she wasn't smart enough to analyze this for herself?

Why not ask that of USCitizen, who also agrees?
Click to expand...

Because she nevers offers anything original. She's just a cheerleader, full bouncy sweater and all.
 
Darla said:
Thank you, I am very glad that someone else noticed it.
Click to expand...

I've noticed it before and commented on it before.

Does it matter that it appears that our opinion of Paul, not my opinion, is also shared by a great number of Americans. Does that imply that they're all kissing my ass, or would it be just the "girls" who are doing so?

Does it matter that Paul is going backwards in some of the real polls indicating that he's reached a peak in his support?

Are only Ronbots capable of discerning truth?

What is disingenuous is not acknowledging that America doesn't give a damn about Ron Paul.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Because she nevers offers anything original. She's just a cheerleader, full bouncy sweater and all.
Click to expand...

This coming from the board clown and buffoon who is incapable of civil intellectual discussion .. and is too dumb to recognize that your comment validates what we've been saying.
 
Darla said:
Thank you, I am very glad that someone else noticed it.
Click to expand...


blackascoal said:
There are more people here than Darla that agree with me on a variety of issues. I've never heard anyone challenged on it BUT Darla. In fact, I've responded to this before.

I ask you, what makes him or you think that because she agrees with me on a particular issue, she wasn't smart enough to analyze this for herself?

Why not ask that of USCitizen, who also agrees?
Click to expand...
Because USCit has done more than just 'agree'.


uscitizen said:
And I looked at RP's voting record vs his letter that I posted on the other board and they do not match up.

Thanks for giving me the initiative to understand RP a bit better.
I do appreciate that.
Click to expand...
Notice here that uscit wasn't just "Yup!"


Darla said:
You're being a pisspot for some reason today, and I can usually ignore it, but it is pissing me off for this reason.
Click to expand...

It's because I'm a guy.

The FP board was a sexist board in many ways. I can't count the number of times I was called a c*nt on that board, just for starters. A lot of the little boys posting on there were sexists. And I am the only one who has been singled out on this board for fucking agreeing with someone. And I damned well will point out sexist behavior without being scolded for it by you daddy.

You jumped to demean me on this thread by trying to imply that I am some crazy feminazi who is always screaming sexist, when in fact, unless I am flirting with someone, my gender rarely comes up on this board.

And I'm annoyed enough where I really don't want to talk to you for the rest of the day, so that I don't say anything I'll regret, because normally I quite like you.
Click to expand...

I didn't demean you, I pointed out that you demean yourself using that as the reason for his post with no evidence of that being the reason.
 
In several years of "knowing" Adam, he has never given me cause to believe him to be sexist in that manner.
 
AssHatZombie said:
It's not sexist, woman are just not suited for rational conversation, they are primarily emotive and childish in nature.
Click to expand...

Just for giggles .. give me an approximate number of women in positions of authority that you will never in your life achieve because you do not possess the intellectual capacity to do what they do?

You can round it off to the nearest million.
 
Actually they're ok. Many are smart. What's happened recently though is many of average intelligence believe that intelligence is merely having the "right" opinions, and when they confront fact and logic to the contrary, they break down, retreat into their victimhood status, and refoment their internal hatred of men.
 
Darla said:
Because this isn't sexist, right Damo?

And this is exactly what they are saying.
Click to expand...
No, that is, and there is every bit of evidence that it is. Can you see the difference? Adam pointed out that all you had offered in that post was "yup" without regard to any point that he had made and made no indication that you even had bothered to read his points. You simply jumped to the conclusion that he assumed that it was because you were a 'girl' that he made the point at all.

When there is evidence of sexism, there is nothing wrong with pointing it out. Assumed sexism based on "Well he didn't say that to uscit!" when uscit had offered more than "yup" in the thread was just a bad assumption with no evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top