Ron Paul/FP.com Flashback Pop Quiz

AssHatZombie said:
Actually they're ok. Many are smart. What's happened recently though is many of average intelligence believe that intelligence is merely having the "right" opinions, and when they confront fact and logic to the contrary, they break down, retreat into their victimhood status, and refoment their internal hatred of men.
Click to expand...
Women are simply human beings with different sex organs. People often attempt to make them into some sort of other species and therefore attempt to describe their responses as alien to guys. Both of those ideas are rubbish. Growing up with 3 Sisters and a single mother will give you more than enough evidence that women are simply people with different sex organs, they have the same ideas and ambitions, drives and thoughts.
 
blackascoal said:
Perhaps you don't "know" him as much as you think you do.

Please explain why Darla was smart enough to discern truth for herself.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you are too quick to jump to such a conclusion. And clearly I have given enough reason for at least more thought than this. You have come to your opinion and closed your mind to any alternative.
 
Damocles said:
No, that is, and there is every bit of evidence that it is. Can you see the difference? Adam pointed out that all you had offered in that post was "yup" without regard to any point that he had made and made no indication that you even had bothered to read his points. You simply jumped to the conclusion that he assumed that it was because you were a 'girl' that he made the point at all.

When there is evidence of sexism, there is nothing wrong with pointing it out. Assumed sexism based on "Well he didn't say that to uscit!" when uscit had offered more than "yup" in the thread was just a bad assumption with no evidence.
Click to expand...

I'll tell you what Damo, I don't post "yup" to anything, and I am not a cheerleader, and my posts are very political and thought out.

But as I see this is your opinion of me, why don't you go fuck yourself, or better yet, Adam?
 
Darla said:
Notice here that uscit wasn't just "Yup!"

Excuse me asshole, did you just come on here and say that I post "Yup!"?
Click to expand...
It was an 'exaggeration'. And no I don't mean to say that is all you post.


*sigh* whatever. Keep using it, it appears to work.
 
Darla said:
I'll tell you what Damo, I don't post "yup" to anything, and I am not a cheerleader, and my posts are very political and thought out.

But as I see this is your opinion of me, why don't you go fuck yourself, or better yet, Adam?
Click to expand...
Wow. Talk about taking a specific point too far.
 
Damocles said:
No, that is, and there is every bit of evidence that it is. Can you see the difference? Adam pointed out that all you had offered in that post was "yup" without regard to any point that he had made and made no indication that you even had bothered to read his points. You simply jumped to the conclusion that he assumed that it was because you were a 'girl' that he made the point at all.

When there is evidence of sexism, there is nothing wrong with pointing it out. Assumed sexism based on "Well he didn't say that to uscit!" when uscit had offered more than "yup" in the thread was just a bad assumption with no evidence.
Click to expand...

Yet you didn't notice that Adam didn't address any point I made, as usual. he chose instead to alter what I said, but lacked the capacity to address it directly.
 
Darla said:
I'll tell you what Damo, I don't post "yup" to anything, and I am not a cheerleader, and my posts are very political and thought out.

But as I see this is your opinion of me, why don't you go fuck yourself, or better yet, Adam?
Click to expand...


Actually, you're a brainwashed idiot.
 
blackascoal said:
Yet you didn't notice that Adam didn't address any point I made, as usual. he chose instead to alter what I said, but lacked the capacity to address it directly.
Click to expand...
He did though. You take one post and attempt to describe it as his entire argument, which is rubbish. I can clearly read the thread and see that he has made points and couterpoints to your argument, and a 'joke' post where he pointed out that he was making a joke.
 
Damocles said:
No, I posted the definition above, this would not fit that definition.

I simply concede. I can see why she uses it, it works.
Click to expand...

You know, I am really upset and offended by you personally and the demeaning shit you have said about me on this thread. But I can't put you on IA because it won't let me because you are the moderator. So why don't you just stop it right now, so that this doesn't go any further.

I didn't fucking use anything, I stated my worthless, female, cheerleading opinion, and it flipped you out , and caused you to reveal what you think of both me, and my posts.
 
Darla said:
You know, I am really upset and offended by you personally and the demeaning shit you have said about me on this thread. But I can't put you on IA because it won't let me because you are the moderator. So why don't you just stop it right now, so that this doesn't go any further.

I didn't fucking use anything, I stated my worthless, female, cheerleading opinion, and it flipped you out , and caused you to reveal what you think of both me, and my posts.
Click to expand...

:FootMouth:

I'll make sure I'm quiet by stuffing that hole.

I think you are one of the most intelligent posters that I have.
 
Damocles said:
Perhaps you are too quick to jump to such a conclusion. And clearly I have given enough reason for at least more thought than this. You have come to your opinion and closed your mind to any alternative.
Click to expand...

I'm dealing with what the man actually posts.

Is this your version of "YUP".

It's ignorant to assume that people who don't care for Paul are uninformed.

Have you paid any attention to the fact that he isn't going anywhere in the polls and if he was so great on the internet .. WHERE IN THE FUCK IS ALL THE MONEY HE SHOULD BE COLLECTING?

I suggest that your pal Adam isn't wrapped as tight around the facts as he pretends to be and feel free to step in and answer why he's going nowhere for him .. because Adam doesn't deal in substance.

If this is counter to your perception of him .. that's too goddamn bad, but it hardly puts you or anybody else in a position to challenge Darla's perspectives of agreeing with positions she believes in.

Frankly, given that I respect you as a fair person, I'm surprised by this.
 
blackascoal said:
I'm not sure why you apologized, but as you can see, you're not debating with reasonable people.
Click to expand...

It's freakin simple math dude. Read the quote. Don't tell me you are misreading it as well? Good lord. I know you can math blackascoal and have reading comprehension.

75% of all votes is 75% out of 100%. Not 75% out of 80%.
 
Darla said:
You know, I am really upset and offended by you personally and the demeaning shit you have said about me on this thread. But I can't put you on IA because it won't let me because you are the moderator. So why don't you just stop it right now, so that this doesn't go any further.

I didn't fucking use anything, I stated my worthless, female, cheerleading opinion, and it flipped you out , and caused you to reveal what you think of both me, and my posts.
Click to expand...


she's a victim, cant we see? can't we see what patriarchy has done to her? When she gets enough power she will kill us all.

Hillary '08!
 
Damocles said:
:FootMouth:

I'll make sure I'm quiet by stuffing that hole.

I think you are one of the most intelligent posters that I have.
Click to expand...

You wouldn't know it from this thread Damo, it sounds like you want to put me in a sweater and have me jump up and down for AHZ's entertainment. And it's very isulting coming from you, whom, I don't expect it from.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top