Ron Paul/FP.com Flashback Pop Quiz

[Damocles]

I'm dealing with what the man actually posts.

Is this your version of "YUP".

It's ignorant to assume that people who don't care for Paul are uninformed.

Have you paid any attention to the fact that he isn't going anywhere in the polls and if he was so great on the internet .. WHERE IN THE FUCK IS ALL THE MONEY HE SHOULD BE COLLECTING?

I suggest that your pal Adam isn't wrapped as tight around the facts as he pretends to be and feel free to step in and answer why he's going nowhere for him .. because Adam doesn't deal in substance.

If this is counter to your perception of him .. that's too goddamn bad, but it hardly puts you or anybody else in a position to challenge Darla's perspectives of agreeing with positions she believes in.

Frankly, given that I respect you as a fair person, I'm surprised by this.

No, that was a point on how you thought she had come to the "correct conclusion" about a poster that I have years of experience with and had a ton of evidence to come to an opinion on.

It was not a post, at all, about Ron Paul or your opinion on him. I think you considered that one before coming to it as evinced by your posts in this thread.

 

[Cancel7]

You shut up Asshat. You are not the big thinker around here, what's laughable is that you think that you are, apparently, because you have a penis, or claim to. You're a conspiracy lunatic who people laugh at, and you don't even have the advantage of being able to get a job jumping up and down as anybody's cheerleader because nobody wants to see you in a thong.

 

[Litmus]

At least Im consistent, when doni and usc both disagree with me, I ridiculously assert that their union has to do with their sexuality, and accuse them of butt boinking and fellatio. Im the only fair person on the board.

 

[blackascoal]

He did though. You take one post and attempt to describe it as his entire argument, which is rubbish. I can clearly read the thread and see that he has made points and couterpoints to your argument, and a 'joke' post where he pointed out that he was making a joke.

Sounds like your version of "YUP".

 

[Litmus]

You shut up Asshat. You are not the big thinker around here, what's laughable is that you think that you are, apparently, because you have a penis, or claim to. You're a conspiracy lunatic who people laugh at, and you don't even have the advantage of being able to get a job jumping up and down as anybody's cheerleader because nobody wants to see you in a thong.

I am the big thinker. You reject everything you read about the heinous nature of our banking system because you really don't understand the criticisms.

 

[Damocles]

Sounds like your version of "YUP".

It was a direct counter to the point of your post (as is this one). You are being deliberately disingenuous now. And yes, USCit, the word does fit here and I did use it again.

 

[uscitizen]

At least Im consistent, when doni and usc both disagree with me, I ridiculously assert that their union has to do with their sexuality, and accuse them of butt boinking and fellatio. Im the only fair person on the board.

I would rate you more as poor than fair.

 

[Litmus]

I know my hangup on fiat currency and fractional reserve lending is merely an expression of my provincialism.

 

[Litmus]

I would rate you more as poor than fair.

You're biased, having been decimated time and time again by the white hot light of my super potent beingness.

 

[Damocles]

I know my hangup on fiat currency and fractional reserve lending is merely an expression of my provincialism.

*Woot* *WOOT* *WOOT* Hijack alarm!!!! *WOOT* WOOT* WOOT*

 

[Litmus]

Anytime is good time for a "me" party. God bless me. Long live me.

 

[Damocles]

Let's get this back on track.

Libertarians think Ron Paul is the second coming of George Washington, Apple Pie, and just the full-on American Way all rolled up into one sweet, sweet choice for President.

Socialists think Ron Paul is a dangerous fanatic who rapes chickens and strips barbie dolls naked....

GO!

 

[Litmus]

I agree with blackascoal that complete deregulation is not the answer to the issues ron paul brings up, but the dems here only criticize his solution and refuse to even discuss the issues he presents.

 

[uscitizen]

You're biased, having been decimated time and time again by the white hot light of my super potent beingness.

Oh so correct, I am just held together by vlecro now

 

[blackascoal]

No, that was a point on how you thought she had come to the "correct conclusion" about a poster that I have years of experience with and had a ton of evidence to come to an opinion on.

It was not a post, at all, about Ron Paul or your opinion on him. I think you considered that one before coming to it as evinced by your posts in this thread.

It doesn't matter how many years of experience you've had with that poster. What in the hell difference would that make?

My posts in this thread ARE NOT ABOUT POSTERS, they are about Ron Paul and the evidence that demonstrates why voters are not interested in him.

Adam throws up a Ron Paul thread seemingly everyday. Yet Paul has NO CHANCE at being nominated.

What makes you believe that my posts in this thread aren't right on point and that Darla should be questioned because she agrees with what quite obviously, most of America thinks of this man.

Is it news to you that many consider him to be an absolute kook?

Adam has not yet addressed, and feel free to do so yourself, as to how in the fuck Paul pretends to be anti-corporatist when at the same time he's shilling for complete corporate control without restrictions.

I'll wait for your answer because your buddy sure as hell didn't have one.

 

[Damocles]

I agree with blackascoal that complete deregulation is not the answer to the issues ron paul brings up, but the dems here only criticize his solution and refuse to even discuss the issues he presents.

I too agree with that. As a constitutional conservative I realize that federal regulation is constitutional when it applies to interstate commerce.

 

[blackascoal]

I agree with blackascoal that complete deregulation is not the answer to the issues ron paul brings up, but the dems here only criticize his solution and refuse to even discuss the issues he presents.

I question and discuss those issues all the time .. although I'm not a democrat.

 

[Cypress]

50 posts, because one poster happened to agree with another?

Yeah, anyone who knows Darla, knows she's one of the smartest and most astute posters here. Who's that hack that said or implied she was just an intellectually incurious parrot, who just agreed with BAC?

LOL - that's so far from the truth, it hilarious that any hack would even suggest it.

 

[Litmus]

Adam has not yet addressed, and feel free to do so yourself, as to how in the fuck Paul pretends to be anti-corporatist when at the same time he's shilling for complete corporate control without restrictions.

I'll wait for your answer because your buddy sure as hell didn't have one.

Adam, you do need to address this. For real. I'm an anti internationalist fascist, and though some deregulation is necessary to undo the undue burden on small companies, complete dereg is kind of insane.

and adam, what's your immigration stance?

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Nope.

it's desh.