Sarah Palin...

Southern Man said:
Her hubby would kick his ass big time for lusting after his wife in such a disgusting and demeaning manner. LOL
Click to expand...

Fact of the matter is men like this who talk the loudest, the rudest, and the most foul aren't much of anything in real life. This anonymous bravado is just that.

Anonymous bravado.

Of course he could be the exception, but certainly not the rule.

As for Dumb and Dumber? They are just a couple of typical post teen young neanderthals.
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
No. Conservatives believe as the Founding Documents state: all men are created equal. It was you Democrats who enslaved Africans, raped their women, broke up their families, then after you went to war with us and got your sorry asses kicked you hung them and burned crosses on their front yards. After we jailed you for that you passed laws to keep them separate from you.
Click to expand...

And now some conservatives want to remove the equality in favor of only not allowing gays to marry.

Of the two (conservatives and liberals) groups today, the conservatives would be FAR more likely to burn crosses in yards. Such are the changes in the political spectrum.
 
WinterBorn said:
And now some conservatives want to remove the equality in favor of only not allowing gays to marry.

Of the two (conservatives and liberals) groups today, the conservatives would be FAR more likely to burn crosses in yards. Such are the changes in the political spectrum.
Click to expand...

Pure hysterical, predictable, and provocative speculation.

Is this your set up for the day to keep you flush in posting action?
 
WinterBorn said:
And now some conservatives want to remove the equality in favor of only not allowing gays to marry.

Of the two (conservatives and liberals) groups today, the conservatives would be FAR more likely to burn crosses in yards. Such are the changes in the political spectrum.
Click to expand...

Queers aren't qualified to marry just like the blind aren't qualified to drive. You bring up this subject in every thread. Get the fuck over it.

The fact is that lib-tards and Democrats are the far more likely to commit terrorist acts. Ted Kazinski, Environment First, the KKK.
 
WinterBorn said:
This is just my pointing out the hypocrisy of some, so called, conservatives.
Click to expand...


It's isn't a point at all. It's pure conjecture and speculation based only in a need to incite an argument to once again position yourself for your daily day long battle(s).

If it is a point, it's moot.
 
Southern Man said:
Queers aren't qualified to marry just like the blind aren't qualified to drive. You bring up this subject in every thread. Get the fuck over it.

The fact is that lib-tards and Democrats are the far more likely to commit terrorist acts. Ted Kazinski, Environment First, the KKK.
Click to expand...

You are comparing the blind driving with gay marriage?

I bring it up when you start with your "conservatives love equality and dems hate people" bullshit.

The KKK started out as a dem group. But I would be willing to wager that damn few of them are dems any more. The times have changed and the conservative movement has done a 180 as far as its social ideal.

The fiscal conservatives are viable candidates and are still follow traditional conservative values. The social conservatives, on the other hand, have abandoned the ideals of smaller, less intrusive gov't.

Bombing abortion clinics, murdering abortion doctors, bombing adult book stores, the car-bombing in Iowa, and the Atlanta Olympics bombings were all by conservatives.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
It's isn't a point at all. It's pure conjecture and speculation based only in a need to incite an argument to once again position yourself for your daily day long battle(s).

If it is a point, it's moot.
Click to expand...

It is a perfectly valid point when people are trying to slam other people by talking about them hating equality because of their liberal leanings, while at the same time engaging in wholesale mockery of people and refusing to acknowledge that they themselves have fought against equality.

You want to claim its moot because you wish to buddy up with SM.
 
Southern Man said:
Example?
Click to expand...

You are in favor of amending the US Constitution to interfere in marriages of private citizens.

You are not in favor of removing the gov't from marriages.

You are in favor of the state of NC removing someone from office or invalidating his election because he is an atheist.
 
The amendment process is part of the US Constitution.

State governments have their own constitutions and laws. This tread is about the US Constitution.
 
Southern Man said:
The amendment process is part of the US Constitution.

State governments have their own constitutions and laws. This tread is about the US Constitution.
Click to expand...

You asked for examples concerning my statement "The social conservatives, on the other hand, have abandoned the ideals of smaller, less intrusive gov't."

I gave valid examples.

Yes, the amendment process is part of the US Constitution. But that does not change the fact that you support a constitutional amendment that calls for more interference in private lives.

State gov'ts do indeed have their own constitutions. Thanks for that fact, Captain Obvious. But it does not change the fact that you want the state gov't to interfere in a valid election and ignore the will of the people, just to enforce your religious beliefs.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
Fact of the matter is men like this who talk the loudest, the rudest, and the most foul aren't much of anything in real life. This anonymous bravado is just that.

Anonymous bravado.

Of course he could be the exception, but certainly not the rule.

As for Dumb and Dumber? They are just a couple of typical post teen young neanderthals.
Click to expand...

:clink:
 
WinterBorn said:
It is a perfectly valid point when people are trying to slam other people by talking about them hating equality because of their liberal leanings, while at the same time engaging in wholesale mockery of people and refusing to acknowledge that they themselves have fought against equality.

You want to claim its moot because you wish to buddy up with SM.
Click to expand...

No Solitary. You want to stir the shit pot and then claim innocent victim all the effin' day long.

I am perfectly willing to concede that SM does his share of shit-stirring. The most distinguishing difference is he doesn't cry victim out the other side of his mouth. He owns it.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
No Solitary. You want to stir the shit pot and then claim innocent victim all the effin' day long.

I am perfectly willing to concede that SM does his share of shit-stirring. The most distinguishing difference is he doesn't cry victim out the other side of his mouth. He owns it.
Click to expand...

WTF?? lol Thats hilarious. Especially considering the number of times SM has mentions people neg repping him.

I have no problem owning anything I do. I have not cried victim at all. Perhaps you are mistaking me for someone else.
 
WinterBorn said:
WTF?? lol Thats hilarious. Especially considering the number of times SM has mentions people neg repping him.

I have no problem owning anything I do. I have not cried victim at all. Perhaps you are mistaking me for someone else.
Click to expand...



You being all over this like white on rice proves my point rather succinctly. I am done with your histrionics.

Have some shame man. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top