Secret Service agents confirm Hutchinson details

[Ross Dolan]

i definitely do.

she testified to WHAT SHE WAS TOLD.

that's called hearsay. it would be disallowed in a real trial about something trump did.

No, you fucking moron.

Look at your own definition...and you will see that is incorrect.

The situation is much more nuanced than you want to acknowledge, because you are interested in trashing this woman. That is because you are a scumbag, ignorant supporter of the disgusting bag of garbage known as Trump.

That is your right, good buddy. Do it to your heart's content. I'm getting a kick out of calling it to your attention...so we have a win/win situation going.

In any case, she is not testifying to what he said in order to "prove the truth of the matter asserted." She was simply testifying to what she was told. She does not know what happened in that car...nor is she saying she does. She is merely telling us what she was told.

It is NOT hearsay in that form.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

No, you fucking moron.

Look at your own definition...and you will see that is incorrect.

The situation is much more nuanced than you want to acknowledge, because you are interested in trashing this woman. That is because you are a scumbag, ignorant supporter of the disgusting bag of garbage known as Trump.

That is your right, good buddy. Do it to your heart's content. I'm getting a kick out of calling it to your attention...so we have a win/win situation going.

In any case, she is not testifying to what he said in order to "prove the truth of the matter asserted." She was simply testifying to what she was told. She does not know what happened in that car...nor is she saying she does. She is merely telling us what she was told.

It is NOT hearsay in that form.

it is hearsay in this form.

there are just no objections because its not a trial.

there's nothing nuanced here.

you're totally and completely wrong.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Dems want to try cases in the court of public opinion and they want hearsay allowed at those trials.

 

[Ross Dolan]

it is hearsay in this form.

there are just no objections because its not a trial.

there's nothing nuanced here.

you're totally and completely wrong.

You truly are a fucking asshole...and ignorant as well.

Continue with your delusions. Only makes me laugh.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

You truly are a fucking asshole...and ignorant as well.

Continue with your delusions. Only makes me laugh.

You're trying to sell hearsay as something meaningful.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

It dont matter what the judges in WI said, I have already conceded and gave you the electoral votes for that state, I am even giving you the electoral votes for PA, and guess what?
You still fucking lose and Biden wins.

and since the demmycrats are okay with unconstitutional elections America loses.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

What she said is not hearsay. She told the committee what she was told. That is not hearsay.

Wake the fuck up.

dude.....that is PRECISELY what hearsay is.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You are wrong...but that is probably because you are a fucking moron.

She did not testify to Trump's behavior. She testified to what she was told. And she testified truthfully to what she was told.

so for clarification.....was Tony lying when he told her what happened or lying when he said he never told her?........

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I do understand what hearsay means legally. Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement, made in court, to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

She was not trying to prove the truth of the matter asserted...that Trump did what she was told he did. She was testifying to what she was told.

She IS allowed to do that...and it is admissible for the purposes of what she was told. It is not in anyway proof of the assertion of what she was told.

ROFL....so your defense of her testimony is that no one was trying to prove anything with her testimony?......for what you claim to be true she should have stopped with "I talked with Tony"........

 

[anonymoose]

The results don't change the facts. Trump was cited as having committed criminal Obstruction of Justice on six separate occasions. Trump shook down a world leader in an attempt to have his political opponent investigated. if you don't care about it, don't spout absolute falsehoods. Just say 'don't know, don't care' and a call it a day.

You still haven’t stated what I made up or falsehoods I spouted. AFAIC Trump didn’t obstruct justice in the mueller investigation because it was an investigation based on a hoax. If he obstructed anything it was a witch hunt.
Trump’s behavior is unacceptable for a president and he got voted out. I just wish the dims had nominated someone better than Joe. Because he’s so bad a president it actually raises the possibility of trump getting elected again.

 

[BidenPresident]

You still haven’t stated what I made up or falsehoods I spouted. AFAIC Trump didn’t obstruct justice in the mueller investigation because it was an investigation based on a hoax.

Trump's FBI was investigating the Trump Campaign. Trump's DOJ appointed Mueller as a Special Counsel. If you cannot use facts to make your argument, then admit you just have uninformed opinion.

 

[anonymoose]

Trump's FBI was investigating the Trump Campaign. .

No stupid. Obamas FBI was investigating trump immediately after trump was elected.

 

[anonymoose]

Trump's DOJ appointed Mueller as a Special Counsel.

Yes. Rosenstein appointed mueller. Where did I say that didn’t happen? Back on ignore you go troll.

 

[BidenPresident]

No stupid. Obamas FBI was investigating trump immediately after trump was elected.

If you lie, I won't bother with you.

 

[BidenPresident]

Yes. Rosenstein appointed mueller. Where did I say that didn’t happen? Back on ignore you go troll.

bye asshole, no loss

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

A very tiny portion of her testimony was heresy. But I understand why you fixate over it.

What she said is not hearsay. She told the committee what she was told. That is not hearsay.

Wake the fuck up.

That is the textbook definition of hearsay.She herself witnessed nothing. She repeated what somebody told her that somebody told them. If this were a court of law she'd be laughed out of it.

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

A very tiny portion of her testimony was heresy. But I understand why you fixate over it.

The Secret Service has an important job.

They protect the president from harm.

They prevented him from going to the Capitol because it wasn't safe and secure.

It wasn't safe and secure at the Capitol because of what Trump did.

The Secret Service found themselves in the unusual position of protecting the president from the president.

If they had allowed him to go, he would have been right in the middle if the insurrection, thus unable to claim it was not his doing.

The Secret Service protected Trump from himself.

Trump would have called for the peaceful protest he asked people to attend and would have stopped the near riot.

 

[Sawyerloggingon]

A very tiny portion of her testimony was heresy. But I understand why you fixate over it.

lol @ frank doesnt know what hearsay means!

Liberals change the definition of words when it's necessary to perpetuate their narrative.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

You are wrong...but that is probably because you are a fucking moron.

She did not testify to Trump's behavior. She testified to what she was told. And she testified truthfully to what she was told.

that's called hearsay. not allowed in real trials.

 

[floridafan]

That is the textbook definition of hearsay.She herself witnessed nothing. She repeated what somebody told her that somebody told them. If this were a court of law she'd be laughed out of it.

Other than the incident in the car,her testimony was almost entirely first hand. If you choose not to believe that, its tough shit. You very biased opinions mean absolutely nothing.