Secret Service agents confirm Hutchinson details

Sawyerloggingon said:
Trump would have called for the peaceful protest he asked people to attend and would have stopped the near riot.
Click to expand...

He ONLY called for a peaceful protest, after, and well after, his attempt to lead the mob failed. Then he tried to do what was his only hope, CYA.
You continue to post the same lies, one ID after another.
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
That is the textbook definition of hearsay.She herself witnessed nothing. She repeated what somebody told her that somebody told them. If this were a court of law she'd be laughed out of it.
Click to expand...

False. Somebody told her what they witnessed. And she recounted that. The incident is hearsay, the conversation is not. Nor are any conversations to which she was a party. Keep your day job.
 
floridafan said:
A very tiny portion of her testimony was heresy. But I understand why you fixate over it.
Click to expand...

floridafan said:
Other than the incident in the car,her testimony was almost entirely first hand. If you choose not to believe that, its tough shit. You very biased opinions mean absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...

Her testimony of what occurred in the car is what everyone on the left is excited about and it's 100% hearsay.
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
Liberals change the definition of words when it's necessary to perpetuate their narrative.
Click to expand...

Does it really matter, what your opinions are? After all you would defend Trump, to the extreme, regardless of what was said or done.
Done really know why you continue to defend this man, since your allegiance has changed.
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
Her testimony of what occurred in the car is what everyone on the left is excited about and it's 100% hearsay.
Click to expand...

No it isn't. It is just an anecdote that demonstrates Trumps emotional unfitness for the job. The top line is that Trump knowingly sent an armed crowd to the capitol and intended to go into the capitol with them.
 
Concart said:
False. Somebody told her what they witnesses. And she recounted that. The incident is hearsay, the conversation is not. Nor are any conversations to which she was a party. Keep your day job.
Click to expand...

False. Somebody told her somebody told them. It's like that kids game where you keep whispering the same story to another person. Before long Trump would have held a knife to the drivers throat. LOL
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
False. Somebody told her somebody told them. It's like that kids game where you keep whispering the same story to another person. Before long Trump would have held a knife to the drivers throat. LOL
Click to expand...

No you dumb fuck. Ornato and Engel were IN THE CAR.
 
floridafan said:
Does it really matter, what your opinions are? After all you would defend Trump, to the extreme, regardless of what was said or done.
Done really know why you continue to defend this man, since your allegiance has changed.
Click to expand...

Hearsay is a well defined legal term. Your refusal to acknowledge that is a result of your TDS.
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
And neither of them spoke directly to this hearsay witness. That was yet another whitehouse low level employee.
Click to expand...

OMFG yes they did. Jesus Christ, at least read something.

Did you think Hutchinson was a 'low level White House employee?

ROTFLFMAO!!! They don't get an office next to the chief of staff. Wow. You don't know anything do you?
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
Which makes it hearsay.
Click to expand...

I understand full well, that the auto incident is the only part of her testimony you wish to focus on, since the balance is extremely detrimental to DJT. So keep spinning about the auto incident and leave the balance of the testimony to the Justice Dept, and the American people.
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
That is the textbook definition of hearsay.She herself witnessed nothing. She repeated what somebody told her that somebody told them. If this were a court of law she'd be laughed out of it.
Click to expand...

Every suit Trump brought was laughed out of court.

What Hutchinson testified to WAS NOT hearsay. She testified that Ornato told her that an altercation of some sort had happened in the vehicle. THAT WAS NOT HEARSAY, BECAUSE ORNATO DID TELL HER THAT. She DID NOT testify that the altercation happened, just that she was told by Ornato that it did. THAT IS NOT HEARSAY, MORON.

She also was asked if Engel was present when she was told that story by Ornato...to which she replied that he was. THAT ALSO WAS NOT HEARSAY, MORON. He was present...and she can testify to that. Then she was asked if Engel disputed the story in any way...and she testified that Engel did NOT dispute it or correct it in any way. AND THAT WAS NOT HEARSAY.

Okay, Moron?
 
Concart said:
OMFG yes they did. Jesus Christ, at least read something.

Did you think Hutchinson was a 'low level White House employee?

ROTFLFMAO!!! They don't get an office next to the chief of staff. Wow. You don't know anything do you?
Click to expand...

You are completely misinformed but most libs are so no big surprise here. She was an "aide". She got coffee, filed papers, answered the phone etc
 
Sawyerloggingon said:
Liberals change the definition of words when it's necessary to perpetuate their narrative.
Click to expand...


Her testimony was not hearsay. You two are the ones who do not understand what hearsay is. Her testimony was to what she was told...and she was told it. None of it could be used in a trial to indicate what actually happened in that vehicle between the moron, Trump, and his
Secret Service detail...because that would be hearsay. But her testimony about what she was told IS NOT HEARSAY.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top