Sick of the GOP

[/MSG/]

The pressure of the left gearing up to absolutely, in true temper tantrum fashion discredit the court like Obama tried in the SotU address after Citizens United.

I'm pretty sure the USSC is unphased and immune to presidential butt-hurt.

 

[j-mac]

Free market? Show me a free market.

Ok, let me rephrase...a freer market.

 

[Rune]

Ok, let me rephrase...a freer market.

Ok, let me rephrase that....there is no freemarket, except where there is anarchy. Freemarket is nothing more than a Rush talking point. In the USA, it simply doesn't exist.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Ok, let me rephrase that....

Wow...

Yet another chunk of MaRuned ass for ol' the wall in the den, eh, j-mac?

That's at least TWO in one day man!

My "Legend" status might be in jeopardy here!!

 

[Rune]

Wow...

Yet another chunk of MaRuned ass for ol' the wall in the den, eh, j-mac?

That's at least TWO in one day man!

My "Legend" status might be in jeopardy here!!

 

[Granule]

Any evidence at all of this? Or is it just that he didn't vote like you thought he should havem, so there must be a conspiracy?

There's almost never evidence on this sort of thing. I'm drawing my conclusion based on the fact that it took about a month for Roberts to back off his original stance. This whole thing stinks of fear.

I've got to give it to you liberals. You sure know how to manipulate the weak minded fools.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

There's almost never evidence on this sort of thing. I'm drawing my conclusion based on the fact that it took about a month for Roberts to back off his original stance. This whole thing stinks of fear.

I've got to give it to you liberals. You sure know how to manipulate the weak minded fools.

In other words, your idea is just another conspiracy theory? The vast pressure brought to bear on a man who has his job for life.

He is a conservative, yes. But his ruling was the right one and he gave it as he saw fit. That is the end of it. Occam's razor applies here very well. Unless you have some evidence, the simplest explanation is usually the most accurate one.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Beck seems angry at Justice Roberts. I think Roberts voted the way he did, not because it is what he wants, but because he sees it as the proper ruling for the court. Its not a matter of whether he is conservative. It is a matter of whether the case before him is constitutional.

I, for one, would love to see the republicans move back to being classic conservatives. Tax less, spend less, actually have smaller & less intrusive gov't. Fiscal conservatism is desperately needed. The social conservatism that has become the norm will be the death of the republicans.

When have Republicans ever done that? Not in my life time. All the biggest leaps in the size of Government both is scope of powers and literal size have all occurred under Republican Presidents.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Apparently the man felt his position as chief justice might have been threatened.

Uhh...dude....that's an appointment for life too.

 

[Granule]

In other words, your idea is just another conspiracy theory? The vast pressure brought to bear on a man who has his job for life.

Down with the melodramatics, WB. It's an observation, and only an observation.

He is a conservative, yes.

Wrong. He is a RINO at best, as he showed his true colors in this historical decision.

But his ruling was the right one and he gave it as he saw fit. That is the end of it.

No, his ruling was the wrong one for his party, and for the country, now nobody can trust him. THAT is the end of it.

Occam's razor applies here very well. Unless you have some evidence, the simplest explanation is usually the most accurate one.

Wrong, again. This was the furthest thing from Occam's razor. The simplest explanation was "Obamacare is a jumbled mess, therefore, it is unconstitutional. Nancy Pelosi was full of shit. Scrap this abomination and start over".

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Down with the melodramatics, WB. It's an observation, and only an observation.

Wrong. He is a RINO at best, as he showed his true colors in this historical decision.

No, his ruling was the wrong one for his party, and for the country, now nobody can trust him. THAT is the end of it.

Wrong, again. This was the furthest thing from Occam's razor. The simplest explanation was "Obamacare is a jumbled mess, therefore, it is unconstitutional. Scrap it and start over".

I should stop with the melodramatics? YOu claim that the chief justice on the SCOTUS was pressured to make a ruling based on politics rather than constitutionality, and I am the one being melodramatic?

It seems to me that Roberts ruled based on the constitution rather than on his political beliefs. And that is exactly what we want him to do.

 

[Granule]

I should stop with the melodramatics? YOu claim that the chief justice on the SCOTUS was pressured to make a ruling based on politics rather than constitutionality, and I am the one being melodramatic?

Why did he change his mind within one month's time, WB? Pretty sudden, isn't it?

It seems to me that Roberts ruled based on the constitution rather than on his political beliefs. And that is exactly what we want him to do.

How in the hell is Obamacare constitutional?

 

[Granule]

Uhh...dude....that's an appointment for life too.

Tell me you didn't have to Google that to find out whether it's true.

 

[Rune]

Why did he change his mind within one month's time, WB? Pretty sudden, isn't it?



How in the hell is Obamacare constitutional?

How do you know he changed his mind? Prove it.

RomneyCare is constitutional, because SCOTUS ruled it so. If it were unconstitutional, they would have ruled against it.

In the future, can you please put your conspiracy bullshit in the forum so named?

 

[Granule]

How do you know he changed his mind? Prove it.

Sure thing, tough guy. We'll start here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/20...hn-roberts-obamacare-supreme-court-flip-flop/

Do you have any sources that state to the contrary?

RomneyCare is constitutional, because SCOTUS ruled it so. If it were unconstitutional, they would have ruled against it.

Chew on this before you blindly start popping off: http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2012/07/romneycare_vs_o.php

In the future, can you please put your conspiracy bullshit in the forum so named?

In the future, can you please think before you post? You're a disgrace.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I think Glenn Beck is a nut of the nuttiest sort...the right's version of Keith Olberman. BUT, if people think there is a huge difference between Democrats and Republicans in general, they're fooling themselves.

agreed.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Down with the melodramatics, WB. It's an observation, and only an observation.

But you are providing nothing to back up your observation.

Wrong. He is a RINO at best, as he showed his true colors in this historical decision.

Yes... he showed Red White and Blue trump his political views. As WB stated, his job was not to make sure the law was conservative, his job was to make sure it was constitutional. Is the very simple fact that he stood up and finally stopped the abuse of the Commerce clause escaping you?

No, his ruling was the wrong one for his party, and for the country, now nobody can trust him. THAT is the end of it.

He is NEVER supposed to rule based on what is best or right for his party. EVER. Period.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

He is NEVER supposed to rule based on what is best or right for his party. EVER. Period.

This simple fact seems to be escaping so many rightwingers.

 

[blackascoal]

I believe the man either caved under pressure from the Left, or he let some of his true colors spill out.

He did what was in the best interests of our corporate masters.

Now we can proceed with the health insurance industry boon that ACA was meant to be.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

agreed.

Really! So if you don't think there is a huge difference between Democrats and Republicans in general, why are you in near hysterics on this board every day? Why do you even care who wins?