So now what with Ukraine?

I've certainly heard there have been some, but the bottom line is that Ukraine couldn't have lasted as long as it has against Russia without the massive amount of help from NATO.
There have been no troops. Maybe a few military observer, but no troops. NATO has not lost a million troops. NATO is a bunch of western democracies, with western democracy troops, who have western democracy families... That last part is key.

If a million western troops have been killed, several million western family members would be complaining in our free press. That is how I know that Hawk is lying about NATO troops being killed en mass in Ukraine... Israel.... Or any of the other places he claims they have.

If the Ukrainians had wanted to be conquered by the Russians, all the weapons in the world would not have been able to have prevented it. If the Ukrainians wanted to be conquered, the Ukrainians would just use the weapons to help the Russians conquer them.
 
Says that Taurus is almost certainly already in Ukraine (Alex of The Duran says the same thing), will be used, and the Russian response will likely be Russia hitting Germany with Oreshniks:

 
The lack of honesty that it is NATO which has been humiliated in Ukraine works to prevent learning, in a universe where stupid hurts.
Which NATO country did these supposed NATO troops come from?

Did you notice that Hawkeye didn't actually mention troops? Not that there haven't been some, at least early on:
 
I've certainly heard there have been some, but the bottom line is that Ukraine couldn't have lasted as long as it has against Russia without the massive amount of help from NATO.
There have been no troops. Maybe a few military observer, but no troops.

I don't know what classification special forces have, perhaps they could be listed as "observers", who knows:

Regardless, the point is they were soldiers from NATO countries.
 
Did you notice that Hawkeye didn't actually mention troops? Not that there haven't been some, at least early on:
He has said troops, and armies.

Not in the post you were responding to.

He has stated that NATO has lost a million troops.

I do believe I recall Hawkeye saying something to that effect. Hawkeye is sometimes a bit loose with language. Clearly, Ukrainian troops aren't -actually- NATO troops. Financed, aided in the field, guided and sometimes trained by NATO countries, yes, but not officially NATO troops, no. The ironic thing is that without the Ukrainian army acting as a de facto NATO army to "weaken" Russia, NATO's available troops are rather limited.
 
Ukraine is not a sovereign country, it is a vassal of Wall Street Mafia/CIA/MI6/MOSSAD......and AFU is a NATO Army.
Wrong!

You need to educate yourself on history and government, pull your head out of Trump's lying fat crooked ass, and comeback to the discussion when you can contribute here with some kind of reasonable intelligence.

No one has any time for your ignorance and lunacy here.
 
Wrong!

You need to educate yourself on history and government, pull your head out of Trump's lying fat crooked ass, and comeback to the discussion when you can contribute here with some kind of reasonable intelligence.

No one has any time for your ignorance and lunacy here.
You run one life.....Yours.....Get the fuck out of mine.
 
I criticize Trump pretty much every day.
You would have to be a complete traitorous idiot, if you didn't criticize the Idiot.

But to not know the history and facts of the breakup of the Soviet Union, and for you to say that the Ukraine is not a sovereign country today, is a case of ignorance on steroids- and it is for your own good that you best know it.
 
No, he didn't. This is what he said:
Ukraine is not a sovereign country, it is a vassal of Wall Street Mafia/CIA/MI6/MOSSAD......and AFU is a NATO Army.
Ukraine is in theory a sovereign country, although without western support, I think we can agree the war in Ukraine would come to an end rather quickly. I think you know that Ukraine isn't part of NATO and thus Ukraine's army can't be a part of NATO's army. I think it'd be more accurate to say that Ukraine is a wannabe NATO country and western powers have certainly led it down the primrose path of believing that one day, it would join NATO's ranks, when the truth is, it's not going to happen, and its flirtation with NATO and its war with the Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine have only led to disaster.
 
Ukraine is in theory a sovereign country, although without western support, I think we can agree the war in Ukraine would come to an end rather quickly. I think you know that Ukraine isn't part of NATO and thus Ukraine's army can't be a part of NATO's army. I think it'd be more accurate to say that Ukraine is a wannabe NATO country and western powers have certainly led it down the primrose path of believing that one day, it would join NATO's ranks, when the truth is, it's not going to happen, and its flirtation with NATO and its war with the Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine have only led to disaster.
Did you never wonder why you almost never see mention even in alt media of Ukrainian political intrigue...."what's going on in Kiev?"?

The reason is that matters are not decided in Kiev, instructions are piped in.

Come On Man....even NYT's has been forced to admit that American and European generals intimately control military operations in Ukraine, using a force that is paid for by the collective West, a force that is trained by NATO, set up in NATO fashion, using NATO equipment, in the neocon project of bleeding Russia.....its NATO even though the West is not honest enough to admit it......you however should know better.
 
Back
Top