I said I could see a circumstance in which I would support it, and yes, that was the point. In this case race is a proxy for violence given the bifurcated school population. You have incorrectly extrapolated that to mean I would support it in every case.Strawman. No one suggested you were racist for keeping you're child out of that school. I sure as heck would. YOU were the one that said you'd support a segregated prom. You said,
a) Public schools near you are violent
(no one would fault you for not wanting your children anywhere near that kind of environment)
b) most of the people that are violent in your area are black
c) ergo you would support a segregated prom in your area, since you're special.
You could have made a stipulation or made your hypothetical based segregation of trash vs law abiding kids, but you did not.
I'm saying you're racist because you say you'd support segregated proms. I'm assuming racially segregated or are you going to try to back track from the room you've left yourself and pull a Dixie and claim you meant segregated by proclivity to violence, not race? I'm pretty sure that's coming.
There are few Asians in GA outside of Atlanta. There is a hispanic population in rural. It is mostly migrant workers and transients.I wondered about that, but I assumed this small rural Georgia town has neither hispanics nor asians. I could be wrong about that.
I said I could see a circumstance in which I would support it, and yes, that was the point. In this case race is a proxy for violence given the bifurcated school population. You have incorrectly extrapolated that to mean I would support it in every case.
Trog said:Of course, you would think I am racist, but that just shows your ignorance of the meaning of that word. No, I do not believe that whites are inherently better than others. Biased? Every person has a natural preference for association with birds of a feather, that is fact. Ok, I'll accept that I am biased just as all other people are biased. Prejudiced? Pre-judge. No, sorry, that doesn't apply, maybe a new phrase "postjudiced"?
I would definitely be for a segregated school [class, prom, facility] based on previous criminal violence. As a teacher I can see a great use for this. I am also for segregation based on other things, but none of them involves race.
I would definitely be for a segregated school [class, prom, facility] based on previous criminal violence. As a teacher I can see a great use for this. I am also for segregation based on other things, but none of them involves race.
And since middle aged white males are disproportionally responsible for pedophelia and molesting female students, let's segregate them from school dances and classrooms, and only allow White female teachers and black teachers to chaparone dances and other school events. God knows what those white males are capable of, when they see the teenage girls in their pretty dresses.
Fair enough?
I would definitely be for a segregated school [class, prom, facility] based on previous criminal violence. As a teacher I can see a great use for this. I am also for segregation based on other things, but none of them involves race.
Hey thanks.
Seriously, if there is one thing that makes me the maddest about teaching it has to be the type of thing you described. I don't get these guys. I have been teaching 20 years and we have had two cases of "ilicit contact" between a couple of male teachers and female students. No sex, I think we headed that off. But in both cases, separated by 8 years, both male teachers were in their 20's and the girls were junior high age. Both teachers had wives and kids. I mean, to risk your marraige, career and jailtime for this just blows me away. I'm glad I wasn't in charge of their dismissal because even though I am not a violent man I think I would have punched those guys right in the face.
Yeah. I saw this "argument" coming a mile away. If that were the case, why didn't you just say you'd prefer your kids to be segregated based on priors or proclivity to violence - why even bring up race if its a mere coincidence that according to you, the most violent and criminally minded people in your neighborhood are black which would infer that you are racist? You brought up the proxy and said you'd be okay with 'segregated proms'. But that was your not so subtle way of saying that because of you're special circumstances you would approve of such an activity. Which makes no sense because a few threads down you mention your black neighbor who won't send his kids to that school. What about them? Would they be allowed at your segregated prom? I'm anxiously awaiting your back track where you tell us you meant some form of segratation by class or police record.
You're the one who implied the divide between the lawful and unlawful were racially divided in your community. Not me.
"It will be known as the ASS (Asshole Sensor System)"
you just have to be careful not to have it on in DC. Driving around all the politicians may cause it to tilt.
Oh course you saw it coming from a mile away, because it's what I've been saying consistently since my first post on this. I saw that race could be used as a proxy measure for proclivity toward violent behavior in that school. The broader point being that we should understand circumstances fully before calling 'racism.' Not every instance is an example of racism.
Is it prejudice to suggest that there should be a segregated prom even in the instance I illustrated? Yes, it is, because it places responsibility for the actions of one or a few to an entire group. That is exactly what the critics of the white kids in Ashburn have done. The statement by the one girl - Mama and Daddy say don't hang out with coloreds - was put on the whole group.
By your own arguments against my stupid example, equally applied to the Ashburn kids, you are not allowed to call them racist.