Yes it's true. And from a purely philosophical standpoint, one could argue that it is impossible to prove no other life exists in our universe. But the fact-o-the matter is, the OP leads us to believe that a star exploded, and all the ingredients of the primordial soup just came to rest and life emerged. Perhaps that is the case, but isn't it odd and strange that we don't have some kind of life thriving on other planets? The main reason is they lack very much water, but they have no atmosphere to hold in water and shield from the sun anyway... all kinds of things which are problematic for life to survive. It just seems to me, if LIFE just magically sprang forth as a result of space junk, we'd see more examples around us of something. Forget about why we can't find microbes on the moon or Mars, why the hell don't they have abundant life, with atmospheres and water, and ecosystems, and whatnot? It's the same old "we just happened to be lucky" thing? I don't buy it.. a star exploded, spreading it's junk all around for billions of miles... and it just so happened that every single thing we needed to build a planet to support life and develop an ecosystem and evolve into a species with the ability to have this conversation?
I was listening to some pinhead theorist a while back, presenting his idea that life originated from chemical reactions in enzymes found in clay... of course, from there, ALL life sprang forth, or so theorized the pinhead. It intrigued me, because I recall a Biblical account of how God created man by "spitting into the dust." Spit in dust = clay... Isn't that ironic?
