That is a lie. If we confiscated all guns we would be at the mercy of the State. Our founders geared tyranny more than they did citizens owning firearms. They were correct; you are an idiot.
Read some history snowflake.
States With Stricter Gun Laws Have Lower Gun Death Rates Because Gun Laws Work
- Thread starter StoneByStone
- Start date
That is a lie. If we confiscated all guns we would be at the mercy of the State. Our founders geared tyranny more than they did citizens owning firearms. They were correct; you are an idiot.
Read some history snowflake.
There you go with the "rates" argument again. Chicago had 478 homicides in 2017. St. Louis, which has the highest RATE, had 188. 478 much greater than 188.
Chicago does have one of the strictest gun laws in the country. Saying that is doesn't is a lie.
NYC, Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia have city ordinances (ordinances are quasi laws) which impose more restrictions on 2nd Amendment rights than is common across the U.S.
LIE and LAME.
LIE and LAME.
Gun laws only affect those who obey the law. Criminals, but their nature, don't give a shit about laws.
France has far stricter gun laws than the US and they have had multiple mass shooting events and the perps used grenades and automatic weapons.
Into the Night
Verified User
Does not continue to justify doing so.
Truth deflector is doing a real disservice to serious-minded gun fans. He shows how emotional and aggressive many pro-gunners are. He insults and bullies like Trump. Calls people foul names and thinks he is making an intelligent case for guns. He is an example of why some people should not have weapons. A guy with his lack of control and no respect for others is able to buy guns. He should not be allowed near a gun.
There's no evidence that any gun control law has ever made things better. At best, they don't make things worse. Gun control laws only ‘work' if they were unnecessary in the first place.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
If you were able to confiscate all the guns, criminals would still get guns and people would still kill other people. You don't need a gun to kill people. Victims need guns to defend themselves. It's behavior that's the problem, not guns.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
The world is full of countries with very strict gun control laws and much worse problems than the U.S. has.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Funny, California used to have a homicide rate that was below the national average. Now they've got tons of gun control laws and a homicide rate that's above the national average.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Truth Deflector shouldn't be allowed near a computer or a phone.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
But we agree that muh constitution can't actually stop us from doing something.
Into the Night
Verified User
YOU don't get to say. YOU are not a dictator.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Sure, but they don't have the problems America has with mass shootings.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
That's not because of guns, that's because of all the illegal immigrants there.
Actually, they have far worse problems. Brazil, for example, with about 2/3 our population, in a typical year has about twice as many firearm homicides as we do. And that's with very strict gun control laws.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Nope, it's because of an increase in gang activity as a result of our drug laws.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Brazil also has more poverty and government corruption. It's more accurate to compare America to other first world rich countries.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
That too. Which is one of the reasons we should make all drugs legal.
Another one that makes claims about whether or not someone else should own guns. I have an idea. Make a list of those you don't think should own guns, get off your ass, and personally try to take them from those on that list.