The 10 Most Dangerous Places to be a Woman in America

Rana said:
Another stupid idiot who misunderstands Ms. Fluke's testimony, displaying his ignorance for all to see.
Click to expand...

Well, I did find it interesting that a twenty something year old woman attending a VERY expensive catholic institution wants TAXPAYERS to fund something that only costs $9/month. Surely even Mis Fluke can come up with $9 a month for something as important as her "reproductive rights".

It seems very hypocritical that women want these "reproductive rights" but want taxpayers to pay for them.
 
philly rabbit said:
Sanda Fuck disagrees with you.

She claims that the Republicans are trying to stop her from having sex because they oppose government funded abortion.

The government and the money is where I come in.
Click to expand...

Disagrees with me? Ah, no. I was telling you what liberals believe. Me, I believe that abortion, like all healthcare, should be a service of local governments.

Also, your post was a sad misrepresentation of Fluke's position.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
Can you tell me why black women have five times as many abortions as white women?
Click to expand...

Whoever named you the slimey limey really pegged you. That was rootbeer wasn't it? That must be why you hate him; he really saw through you.

I don't know where you got your stats, you lowlife piece of shit. I do know that poor women are at least four times ore likely to suffer an unintended pregnancy than middle class women, so maybe you should start there. If you know anything about US poverty stats and race.

God I can't stand you. I honestly don't know how anyone doesn't see the slime literally oozing off you.
 
signalmankenneth said:
gop-GYN-haters-3.jpg
Click to expand...


Adding this schmuck to the lineup.

20130624-171309.jpg
 
christiefan915 said:
Adding this schmuck to the lineup.

20130624-171309.jpg
Click to expand...

I find it interesting that the pro abortion crowd conveniently ignores the women who ardently oppose abortion. It seems very sexist. Of course if they did include women, then it would be harder to push the meme that men are trying to control women's lady parts
 
Threedee said:
Fixed.



Not Fixed.
Click to expand...

Threedee, I have asked before that people NOT change my words when they quote me if they are going to totally change what I meant. I find that very misleading. I don't know that I've asked you before, so now I'm asking - please do NOT misquote me, especially when you change it into the opposite of what I initially said.
 
evince said:
remember no dick means no fetus
Click to expand...

While I am sure that your pithy little statement causes a riotous guffaw at your feminist meetings, it really has no bearing on the discussion.

As I hear women tell it, they are strong, confident and want COMPLETE CONTROL over their bodies. Well, I take that to mean COMPLETE CONTROL. So shouldn't that therefore mean that they control whether or not sexual intercourse is taking place, with the exception of rape of course.

Are you saying that because a man presents his "dick" to a woman, she is automatically obliged to provide said sexual services? I mean one could just as soon argue that "If the kid doesn't ask for the toys they can't get spoiled" correct?

Surely, since the woman bears the largest burden of sexual intercourse, it would seem to me she would WANT to be less cavalier about sharing this most intimate of actions with just any guy who happens to show her Mr Winky.

I would think that the highest level of control over her body a woman could express is the action of choosing to disrobe and engage in sexual intercourse regardless of who is doing the asking. But, maybe I am giving women too much credit. You seem to be implying that they lack sufficient control over their bodies and their impulses which then leads me to believe that some third party should step in to protect them from themselves.

Have a blessed day :)
 
Let's suggest this, ILA:

You and your female loved one marry. You have sex. She gets pregnant. Three weeks later, you have a massive brain hemorrhage and need 24X7 care; she has to go to work - maybe a couple jobs - to support you.

Having a child would be a huge burden; she can't take care of it and you and work to support you.

What should she do? What if this happens after you already have four kids?

As usual, you are ignoring rape; changed circumstances; failed birth control; etc etc etc

You seem to be implying a woman should assume she is going to get pregnant every time she has intercourse and thus should only have sex when she wants kids. Your poor female loved one.
 
tekkychick said:
Let's suggest this, ILA:

You and your female loved one marry. You have sex. She gets pregnant. Three weeks later, you have a massive brain hemorrhage and need 24X7 care; she has to go to work - maybe a couple jobs - to support you.

Having a child would be a huge burden; she can't take care of it and you and work to support you.

What should she do? What if this happens after you already have four kids?

As usual, you are ignoring rape; changed circumstances; failed birth control; etc etc etc

You seem to be implying a woman should assume she is going to get pregnant every time she has intercourse and thus should only have sex when she wants kids. Your poor female loved one.
Click to expand...

I know that you think that you have created a big GOTCHA, but I will be more than happy to play along with your "WHAT IF?" scenarios.

a) That is why I have disability insurance to cover the costs.
b) We could move in with family. That is what family is for. I know what if they have NO FAMILY whatsoever. They could reach out to their church or friends for help. I know, what if they just moved to Alaska and have no church or any friends whatsoever

I am saddened that somewhere in your life you have been taught that having a child is a huge burden. Having a child is a beautiful thing.

I am saddened that your immediate solution to one tragedy is to murder a baby because it might be hard or inconvenient. I am saddened that you place so much more emphasis on life being easy for you that you would look for the easy way out. Life is hard. That is just the way it is. I don't believe murdering a baby will make it any less hard.

I am not ignoring rape. I think rape is a horrific action that any man can perpetrate on a woman and deserves immediate death sentence. However, I don't see how committing a murder makes the rape go away. Is it easy? No. I don't pretend that it is. But, I don't believe that one injustice deserves another.


http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/kens-story-conceived-in-rape-born-for-love

Well, since pregnancy can occur while having sex yes a woman should assume she is going to get pregnant every time she has intercourse. I am not saying that she should only have sex when she wants kids. I am saying that maybe, just maybe, people shouldn't be so cavalier about having sex. As you have just pointed out in your little made up scenarios there are real world consequences to having sex that outlive the ten second orgasm that one experiences.

Abortion supporters speak of "family planning", but the minute someone says "Hey, how about PLANNING on having a family before engaging in promiscuous behavior" we are immediately labeled a prude.

You seem to want women to be able to have all the fun in the world with their bodies, yet suffer no consequences. Well, I find that to be almost child like. There are consequences and as I pointed out life changing ones that extend past pregnancy. There are STDs, self esteem issues, sexual abuse etc.

You want it both ways. You say you want control over your body when it comes to killing an unborn baby that is now inconvenient for you, but when it comes to the actions that lead to that inconvenient baby, well then you have no control. Sorry. I don't buy it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top