APP - The BBC asks "where's global warming?"
- Thread starter tinfoil
- Start date
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Which is then replaced by a tree which sequesters more CO2.
The minute amount sequestered by this process doesn't nearly make for the mass deforestation caused by human settlement.
Trees grow back after we cut them too. Maybe not in countries with populations that are ignorant or corrupt, but that's not the fault of everyone. We aren't the world's police. We Must all take care of our resources.
And stop believing lying scientists who Mann-ufacture studies. And stop believing scientists are anymore honest than anyone else in the world... they're humans... they're gonna be dishonest
And stop believing lying scientists who Mann-ufacture studies. And stop believing scientists are anymore honest than anyone else in the world... they're humans... they're gonna be dishonest
Last edited:
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Everytime someone re-creates this segment, it gets funnier and funnier.
I'm waiting to see the one made, when the Democrates lose in 20012.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Proof that there is documentation that what I say is true...your problem is that you want to ignore it because it just places your charts and references in a proper perspective that doesn't support your beliefs. TFB, grow and learn to deal with the WHOLE truth....and stop being dazzled by charts, they only tell one story.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Right....so anyone who has proof that contradicts your beliefs is a liar. You can't prove it beyond ONE disputed study....but that's okay for you. I note that you IGNORE that the Shrub & company SUPPRESSED any bonafide scientific research that contradicted the "business as usual" edict. But to your parrot like mind, that's not lying......Jeez, what's worse, your hypocrisy or willful ignorance?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Adjust the tinfoil hat, you simpleton. Because only a simpleton would state that pollution has nothing to do with CO2 levels.
What do you think the whole issue regarding auto emissions has been about the last 30 years, master mind?
How in the fuck do you think oxygen is a part of our atmosphere if the oceans are polluted or the forest hit with acid rain? Do you know how oxygen/CO2 is part of the plants and oceans? Didn't you read the information in the link I provided to that imbecile Good Luck regarding ocean pollutions effect on plankton and algae? Because as GL squawked, the ocean is a part of the oxygen exchange.
Tinfoil, you are a fool. Grow up and learn how to do proper research and critically think.
Litmus
Verified User
Dunce. He said pollution has nothing to do with the concept of co2 controlling climate. Learn to read.
LOL. I expect you'll use the "pants on fire" attack next post.
You are pathetic.
And I would also note that you still have yet to give me a definition of "neocon" that fits your accusation.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
LOL. I expect you'll use the "pants on fire" attack next post.
You are pathetic.
And I would also note that you still have yet to give me a definition of "neocon" that fits your accusation.
Neocons are mostly former Liberals who decided that preemptive military action was the only way to solve the World's problems, some of them live in Colorado.
Right, I pretty much know what people define as a Neocon. Again, he needs to make it fit the accusation. Because I point out the similarity of phrases and his partisan "translation" factor I am suddenly a "neocon". I want to know what definition of that word that particular accusation fits within. It's not a difficult question I put before him. Nothing in any of my posts suggests I support preemptive war (mostly because I don't) and certainly not within the post he suddenly got all defensive about and started flinging poo like a capuchin. However, in his post and his reaction there is abundant evidence of his hacktacularly deep flowing hypocrisy.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Damo, you're a liar....plain and simple. I detest liars. You throw a hissy fit every blessed time you're proven wrong. Grow up...or have the last disproven, repetitive word as it means so much to you.
Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - APP - The BBC asks "where's global warming?"
One thing's for sure....
I'LL BET Y'ALL ARE REALLY GLAD THIS GUY WAS EXTENDED AN INVITATION TO THIS BOARD, ARENT'CHA?
Who do you need to thank for that?
Damo, you're a liar....plain and simple. I detest liars. You throw a hissy fit every blessed time you're proven wrong. Grow up...or have the last disproven, repetitive word as it means so much to you.
Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - APP - The BBC asks "where's global warming?"
One thing's for sure....
I'LL BET Y'ALL ARE REALLY GLAD THIS GUY WAS EXTENDED AN INVITATION TO THIS BOARD, ARENT'CHA?
Who do you need to thank for that?
Last edited:
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You continually live up to your screen name. THINK, stupid, THINK.....if trees exchange CO2 for oxygen, and they are removed as industrial pollution increases CO2 levels, how does that NOT effect the climate? Same with the oceans. Only a stubborn fool would insist that atmosphere change has nothing to do with climate. Repeating your BS won't make it magically come true. Grow up.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Damo's full of shit, Tom. He jumped in on a discussion and couldn't prove his accusation that I was a hypocrit, so he detours to another topic, and then lies about what I say or how things transpired. Now he decides that his demands are the topic of discussion. Fuck him. When he can't win on one end, he just flips the script to what he hopes will vindicate his ego. If you go back and read the posts, you'll note that I never said he was a neocon, but sure as hell duplicates their very actions. I pointed out how he does this....of which was his original accusation that he never provided proof of. You can give him six different definitions, he'll just deny any part of it. Unfortunately for him, his posts belie his assertions.
Last edited:
Because the effects of CO2 forcing HAVE BEEN OVERSTATED!! AS WAS EVIDENCED BY THE HOCKEY STICK GRAPH THAT HAS BEEN DISCREDITED AND THE BRIFFA YAMAL DATA FIASCO AS WELL.
You are lacking in the science, buddy. You are working on disproven premises.
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
maybe it will sink in one of these times
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
CO2 effects have been overstated
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
LOL. I expect you'll use the "pants on fire" attack next post.
You are pathetic.
And I would also note that you still have yet to give me a definition of "neocon" that fits your accusation.
Obviously, you're not comprehending what has transpired here...which would explain your foolish expectations.
You're the one following me here to whine about another post ....so who's pathetic? Not only are you a liar, but you're also a sore loser as well. Grow the fuck up, will ya? No way for someone who runs a discussion board to act..I'm embarassed for you.
You are practically mimicking the idiocy of USFreedumb. Same tactics, same false claims.....that's pretty sad, man.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Just as I thought...I'm dealing with an intellectually bankrupt neocon, who once given a talking point endlessly parrots it, because he's incapable and unwilling to accept any other information.
Thanks for demonstrating how fools like you can only handle one idea at a time. No wonder the Shrub & company loved you so much....when they suppressed reports from the scientific community, you just squawked louder. How sad. Carry on.