the founders told us we can collect taxes so shut up

your chart does not prove what you claim asshole


it jsut does not

Lying about that chart makes yu a fucking idiot.



look at what the site you posted a ljnk to says about your stupid tax plans results

The chart reads, in every instance there was a tax cut, revenues increased. How is that refutable? At the very least, it means tax cuts have not resulted in lower revenues to the federal government. That is simply irrefutable, these are numbers from the office of management and budget of the federal government. They are the historical record.

The article you linked to from the tax policy Center, was an analysis of a proposed plan from over a year ago. It has nothing to do with the legislation which was just passed.
 
largest benefits, in dollar and percentage terms, would go to the highest-income households. Federal revenues would fall by $6.2 trillion over the first decade before accounting for added interest costs. Including interest costs, the federal debt would rise by $7.2 trillion over the first decade and by $20.9 trillion by 2036

As I said, that is from an analysis of a proposal in October of 2016. Please tell me what that has to do with the legislation which just passed Congress.
 
Libs argue the General Welfare clause, which doesn't exist.

lol

You've had your ass kicked on this issue so many times, it's getting wearisome to do so again.

Article I, section 8 of the U. S. Constitution grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States."
 
They don't need to, facts and data are what they are. Were you able to find a drop in revenue from a single tax cut? Can you refute the numbers?

Treasury Department study on the impact of tax bills since 1940, first released in 2006 and later updated, found that the 1981 tax cut reduced revenues by $208 billion in its first four years. (These figures are rendered in constant 2012 dollars.) The tax reform act of 1986, which was designed to be revenue neutral, reduced revenues by less than $1 billion four years after enactment. But Reagan’s tax increases in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1987 boosted revenue by $137 billion.

Look at revenues as % of GDP. Dropped like a rock after Reagan's cuts, increased under Clinton's increases, dropped under Bush's cuts.

Refer to this table. See all the negative numbers? Those represent decreases in receipts due to tax bills.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/WP81-Table2013.pdf
 
U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8



Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And
*



Bring In The New Year With No Credit Card Interest Payments for 15 To 21 Months
NerdWallet


Switch and you could save $620. Yay! Savings make me smile.
Progressive


19 Rare Woodstock Photos That Will Leave You Breathless
History Fanatic
Recommended by

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

They opposed an income tax. You fail
 
now site the tax cuts you claim

also site the numbers from those years

see your chart doesnt prove what you claim fool
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1964
The United States Revenue Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–272), also known as the Tax Reduction Act, was a bipartisan tax cut bill signed by President Lyndon Johnson on February 26, 1964. Individual income tax rates were cut across the board by approximately 20%. In addition to individual income tax cuts, the act slightly reduced corporate tax rates and introduced a minimum standard deduction.[1]







NOT TRICKLE DOWN

the tax cuts went to the people not the wealthy
 
The stated goals of the tax cuts were to raise personal incomes, increase consumption, and increase capital investments. Evidence shows that these goals were exceeded by large degree with the combination of tax cuts and domestic spending programs President Johnson advocated, such as Medicare.[4] Unemployment fell from 5.2% in 1964 to 4.5% in 1965, and fell to 3.8% in 1966.[4][5] Initial estimates predicted a loss of revenue as a result of the tax cuts, however, tax revenue increased in 1964 and 1965.[4][6]


see it was not caused by tax cuts huh
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Reform_Act_of_1986


The U.S. Congress passed the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA) (Pub.L. 99–514, 100*Stat.*2085, enacted October*22, 1986) to simplify the income tax code, broaden the tax base and eliminate many tax shelters. Referred to as the second of the two "Reagan tax cuts" (the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 being the first), the bill was also officially sponsored by Democrats, Richard Gephardt of Missouri in the House of Representatives and Bill Bradley of New Jersey in the Senate.
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 was given impetus by a detailed tax-simplification proposal from President Reagan's Treasury Department, and was designed to be tax-revenue neutral because Reagan stated that he would veto any bill that was not. Revenue neutrality was achieved by offsetting tax cuts for individuals by eliminating $60*billion annually in tax loopholes and shifting $24 billion of the tax burden from individuals to corporations by eliminating the investment tax credit, slowing depreciation of assets, and enacting a stiff alternative minimum tax on corporations.[1][2]





AGAIN NOT TRICKLE DOWN
 
They opposed an income tax. You fail

Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;




Nope its not in there asshole
 
lol

You've had your ass kicked on this issue so many times, it's getting wearisome to do so again.

Article I, section 8 of the U. S. Constitution grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States."

Thomas Jefferson on the "general Welfare" clause of the Constitution:

"Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action; consequently, that the specification of powers is a limitation of the purposes for which they may raise money."
-letter to Albert Gallatin (June 16, 1817)

.
 
now site the tax cuts you claim

also site the numbers from those years

see your chart doesnt prove what you claim fool

Lol, those are the years taxes were cut and which presidents cut them. You're going to have to do a little due diligence of your own. I've given you the years, and the historical data. You can take it at face value, or, you can refute or verify it using yoir own sources. You would just claim my sources are lying anyways.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1964
The United States Revenue Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–272), also known as the Tax Reduction Act, was a bipartisan tax cut bill signed by President Lyndon Johnson on February 26, 1964. Individual income tax rates were cut across the board by approximately 20%. In addition to individual income tax cuts, the act slightly reduced corporate tax rates and introduced a minimum standard deduction.[1]







NOT TRICKLE DOWN

the tax cuts went to the people not the wealthy

What part of "across the board" do you not understand? Also, did you miss the part about corporate rate cuts?
 
Back
Top