the founders told us we can collect taxes so shut up

countryboy said:
1964: JFK/LBJ
1981: Reagan
1986: Reagan
1996: Clinton, capital gains
2001: GWB
2004: GWB

Look at the chart, and show me a single instance where these tax cuts resulted in reduced revenue.

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/federal-receipt-and-outlay-summary
Click to expand...

REVENUE EFFECTS IN BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

64:
Current$: - 11.5
2009$: 64.2
% GDP: -1.6
% federal receipts: -9.0

81:
year 1: -38.3
year 2: -91.6
year 3: -139.0
year 4: -176.7
avg 1st 2: -65.0
avg 4: -111.4

86:
year 1: 18.6
year 2: 0.9
year 3: -11.7
year 4: -9.0
avg 1&2: 9.8
Avg of 4: -0.3

96:
year 1: -9.4
year 2: -3.8
year 3: -18.6
year 4: -20.9
avg 1&2: -6.6
avg of 4: -13.2

2001
year 1: -73.8
year 2: -34.4
year 3: -85.5
year 4: -104.0
avg 1&2: -54.1
avg of 4: -74.4

2004:
year 1: -27.2
year 2: -40.3
year 3: -20.4
year 4: -15.7
avg 1&2: -33.8
avg. 4: -25.9

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/WP81-Table2013.pdf
 
domer76 said:
REVENUE EFFECTS IN BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

64:
Current$: - 11.5
2009$: 64.2
% GDP: -1.6
% federal receipts: -9.0

81:
year 1: -38.3
year 2: -91.6
year 3: -139.0
year 4: -176.7
avg 1st 2: -65.0
avg 4: -111.4

86:
year 1: 18.6
year 2: 0.9
year 3: -11.7
year 4: -9.0
avg 1&2: 9.8
Avg of 4: -0.3

96:
year 1: -9.4
year 2: -3.8
year 3: -18.6
year 4: -20.9
avg 1&2: -6.6
avg of 4: -13.2

2001
year 1: -73.8
year 2: -34.4
year 3: -85.5
year 4: -104.0
avg 1&2: -54.1
avg of 4: -74.4

2004:
year 1: -27.2
year 2: -40.3
year 3: -20.4
year 4: -15.7
avg 1&2: -33.8
avg. 4: -25.9

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/WP81-Table2013.pdf
Click to expand...

Ah, receipt and outlay. What does that have to do with actual revenue?
 
This isn't about the power to collect taxes you poor dumb brain dead leftist assholes; it is about politicians using the tax code to get re-elected by duping poor dumb liberal bastards into thinking they cannot survive without Government.

We don't have a REVENUE problem in this nation; we have a SPENDING and Government Dependency problem.
 
DUMBER IQ of 76 said:
REVENUE EFFECTS IN BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

64:
Current$: - 11.5
2009$: 64.2
% GDP: -1.6
% federal receipts: -9.0

81:
year 1: -38.3
year 2: -91.6
year 3: -139.0
year 4: -176.7
avg 1st 2: -65.0
avg 4: -111.4

86:
year 1: 18.6
year 2: 0.9
year 3: -11.7
year 4: -9.0
avg 1&2: 9.8
Avg of 4: -0.3

96:
year 1: -9.4
year 2: -3.8
year 3: -18.6
year 4: -20.9
avg 1&2: -6.6
avg of 4: -13.2

2001
year 1: -73.8
year 2: -34.4
year 3: -85.5
year 4: -104.0
avg 1&2: -54.1
avg of 4: -74.4

2004:
year 1: -27.2
year 2: -40.3
year 3: -20.4
year 4: -15.7
avg 1&2: -33.8
avg. 4: -25.9

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/WP81-Table2013.pdf
Click to expand...

Another massive pile of stupid from the moron brigade.
 
countryboy said:
Again, what does that have to do with actual numbers on tax receipts? I mean, you know, besides nothing.
Click to expand...

You poor ignorant fuck.

You asked: "point out a single instance where tax cuts have resulted in less revenue."

You then proceeded to cite specific years.

I provided Treasury numbers FOR THOSE YEARS that demonstrated LESS REVENUE was not only collected for that year, but for succeeding years.

Have a 10 year old explain it to you
 
domer76 said:
You poor ignorant fuck.

You asked: "point out a single instance where tax cuts have resulted in less revenue."

You then proceeded to cite specific years.

I provided Treasury numbers FOR THOSE YEARS that demonstrated LESS REVENUE was not only collected for that year, but for succeeding years.

Have a 10 year old explain it to you
Click to expand...

Bullshit. That's not what "revenue effects" measures. Nice try though dumb and domer.
 
DUMBER IQ of 76 said:
You poor ignorant fuck.

You asked: "point out a single instance where tax cuts have resulted in less revenue."

You then proceeded to cite specific years.

I provided Treasury numbers FOR THOSE YEARS that demonstrated LESS REVENUE was not only collected for that year, but for succeeding years.

Have a 10 year old explain it to you
Click to expand...

You ignorant twit; it was an OPINION piece that does not look at historic tables showing revenue increases, but rather a point in time.

Open table 1.1 and show me where revenues diminished as a direct result of tax reductions you moron. What you will see is that spending continues to super-exceed any revenue gains thus illustrating that we do not have a REVENUE problem in this country, but rather a SPENDING problem and IGNORANCE issue with lying liberal idiots like you.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/historical-tables/
 
domer76 said:
Treasury Department study on the impact of tax bills since 1940, first released in 2006 and later updated, found that the 1981 tax cut reduced revenues by $208 billion in its first four years. (These figures are rendered in constant 2012 dollars.) The tax reform act of 1986, which was designed to be revenue neutral, reduced revenues by less than $1 billion four years after enactment. But Reagan’s tax increases in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1987 boosted revenue by $137 billion.

Look at revenues as % of GDP. Dropped like a rock after Reagan's cuts, increased under Clinton's increases, dropped under Bush's cuts.

Refer to this table. See all the negative numbers? Those represent decreases in receipts due to tax bills.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/WP81-Table2013.pdf
Click to expand...

Yes, we all know the "percentage of GDP trick. Let's deal in actual real numbers, m'kay?
 
Truth Detector said:
This isn't about the power to collect taxes you poor dumb brain dead leftist assholes; it is about politicians using the tax code to get re-elected by duping poor dumb liberal bastards into thinking they cannot survive without Government.

We don't have a REVENUE problem in this nation; we have a SPENDING and Government Dependency problem.
Click to expand...

Just imagine what we could cut from spending if all those bleeding heart Liberals would start doing personally for those unwilling to do for themselves. Funny thing is they say they care yet the first and only thing they do to show it is to expect someone else to fund programs. What's worse is they take credit as if the money came from their pockets.
 
Truth Detector said:
This isn't about the power to collect taxes you poor dumb brain dead leftist assholes; it is about politicians using the tax code to get re-elected by duping poor dumb liberal bastards into thinking they cannot survive without Government.

We don't have a REVENUE problem in this nation; we have a SPENDING and Government Dependency problem.
Click to expand...

your problem is you cant sell that idiot crap to the people


its why your party has to CHEAT to win elections
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top