The MAP movement aims to mainstream sex with children

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rune said:
Legion doesn't break the rules, fool.
Click to expand...

McRunester. Have you ever heard the expression "Letter of the Law, and Spirit of the Law"?

Legina is deliberately breaking the Spirit of the Law ('WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT') by his repeated postings of 'Pedophilia' Topics. Numerous Posters have noticed this and have admonished him.
 
Jack said:
McRunester. Have you ever heard the expression "Letter of the Law, and Spirit of the Law"?

Legina is deliberately breaking the Spirit of the Law ('WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT') by his repeated postings of 'Pedophilia' Topics. Numerous Posters have noticed this and have admonished him.
Click to expand...

Regardless of the validity of this particular claim, this is a topic which needs discussed.
 
Rune said:
Regardless of the validity of this particular claim, this is a topic which needs discussed.
Click to expand...

Great. You, USF, and Legina can begin to have a serious and adult conversation on the matter.

(in the meantime, I have a offer that I don't usually discount this low, but since it's Christmas, and it's You, ... for a one-day-only price of $99.99 I can sell you a Bridge that goes from this island to the other side spanning the East River. Please send certified check to my web address: www.runeisanidiot.com)
 
Jack said:
I thought I made it very clear. Legina is a Fraud. Legina has no interest in discussing this as a valid Topic, his ONLY motivation is to provide a platform for a 12b violation. He thinks he is clever and witty while in reality, he is a simple 'Provocateur'. It's not just me (the new guy that is still wet behind the ears), it's 5 other people that have mentioned the same thing here.

Legina has been exposed, had his pants pulled down, and has received a severe spanking from ranking members of the JPP Forum.

How many times in how many days of bringing up 'pedophiles' is it considered a dishonest attempt to discuss pedophilia and more a deliberate and calculated attempt to create a 12b violation? Legina's 'INTENT' ... is not to have an honest adult conversation about this Topic, Legina's intent is to trigger a 12b violation.

IMO, this 'INTENT' is what constitutes a violation of the "WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt."
Click to expand...

What you "THINK" doesn't matter and now can he "create" a situation where someone violates Rule 12b?.

You still haven't shown how bringing up and discussing groups that support pedophilia, is against the rules.

Here, let me help you address what you "THINK". :good4u:

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
Jack said:
McRunester. Have you ever heard the expression "Letter of the Law, and Spirit of the Law"?

Legina is deliberately breaking the Spirit of the Law ('WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT') by his repeated postings of 'Pedophilia' Topics. Numerous Posters have noticed this and have admonished him.
Click to expand...

What you "THINK" doesn't matter.

You still haven't shown how bringing up and discussing groups that support pedophilia, is against the rules.

Here, let me help you address what you "THINK". :good4u:

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
Has the Great Debate on this Topic begun yet?

USF, Rune, Legina. All here. The rest of the Forum is waiting.
 
Jack said:
Has the Great Debate on this Topic begun yet?

USF, Rune, Legina. All here. The rest of the Forum is waiting.
Click to expand...

Why are you trying to hide behind yourself, Jack??

Are you worried that you'll be "tricked" into making a Rule 12b violation; because that's what it's beginning to seem like??

What you "THINK" doesn't matter.

You still haven't shown how bringing up and discussing groups that support pedophilia, is against the rules.

Here, let me help you address what you "THINK". :good4u:

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
So, ... let's review.
A. You support Legina willfully, deliberately, and consciously trying to 'test the Moderators' by his ploy of "Let's talk about Pedophiles".
B. You are keenly aware of JPP Policy of: "WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT".
C. Yet, you disregard the stated Policy and prefer to be an 'Enabler', ... a 'Co-conspirator'.
D. You (and Legina) rely on the Moderators, like Miss Phantasmal, of being Conservative/Religious types and will 'look the other way' when like minded Idealogues, like yourself and Legina, flaunt the Rules.



Is there some reason you, Legina, Rune, and your faithful male secretary Dark Soul, haven't engaged in ANY meaningful dialogue about 'Pedophiles'?
Or, ................ do you ADMIT it is a sham to circumvent the stated Rules of "WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT"?



USFREEDOM911 said:
Why are you trying to hide behind yourself, Jack??

Are you worried that you'll be "tricked" into making a Rule 12b violation; because that's what it's beginning to seem like??

What you "THINK" doesn't matter.

You still haven't shown how bringing up and discussing groups that support pedophilia, is against the rules.

Here, let me help you address what you "THINK". :good4u:

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
 
Jack said:
So, ... let's review.
A. You support Legina willfully, deliberately, and consciously trying to 'test the Moderators' by his ploy of "Let's talk about Pedophiles".
B. You are keenly aware of JPP Policy of: "WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT".
C. Yet, you disregard the stated Policy and prefer to be an 'Enabler', ... a 'Co-conspirator'.
D. You (and Legina) rely on the Moderators, like Miss Phantasmal, of being Conservative/Religious types and will 'look the other way' when like minded Idealogues, like yourself and Legina, flaunt the Rules.



Is there some reason you, Legina, Rune, and your faithful male secretary Dark Soul, haven't engaged in ANY meaningful dialogue about 'Pedophiles'?
Or, ................ do you ADMIT it is a sham to circumvent the stated Rules of "WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT"?
Click to expand...

Why are you trying to hide behind yourself, Jack??

Are you worried that you'll be "tricked" into making a Rule 12b violation; because that's what it's beginning to seem like??

What you "THINK" doesn't matter.

You still haven't shown how bringing up and discussing groups that support pedophilia, is against the rules.

Here, let me help you address what you "THINK". :good4u:

12. Rule 12 - Limits on sexual content:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top